Here I will explain what is meant by 'French' when we are talking about Foleys and NG tubes and such.
Also we will cover what the 'Gauge' of an IV means.
(1/ )
'French' isn't named after France 🇫🇷, the country.
It's (indirectly) named after a person -- Joseph-Frédéric-Benoît Charrière, a Swiss instrument maker who started off making knives but went on to make a huge variety of surgical instruments.
When Charrière made instruments, he picked his own unit of measurement that corresponded to 1/3 of a millimeter...this was the 'Charrière'.
But English speakers struggled to pronounce 'Charrière', so the companies changed it to 'French'.
So 1 'French' became 1/3 millimeter.
Again: 1 Fr = 1/3 mm.
Only things that are circular tubes have a 'French'. So things like central lines, NG tubes, Foleys, etc.
The 'French' always refers to the *outer diameter* of a tube.
For example, an 18 Fr NG tube = an NG tube with an *outer diameter* of 6 mm.
Here is a 7 Fr central line (triple lumen).
Again, the '7 Fr' refers to the *outer diameter*. It doesn't matter how many lumens it may have: that's a separate issue. It's 7 Fr, and therefore its outer diameter is 7/3 = 2.33 mm.
It's the same unit of measurement for all devices:
A 12 Fr NG tube has the same outer diameter as a 12 Fr dialysis catheter, a 12 Fr Foley catheter, or a 12 Fr chest tube.
All of these 12 Fr devices will have an outer diameter of 12/3 = 4 mm.
In some countries that have less of a problem pronouncing 'Charrière', catheters instead use the 'Ch' abbreviation instead of 'French'.
Here we see an '18 Ch' Foley, and we are reminded again that this means it's 6 mm in diameter.
On the other hand 'Gauge' is a different thing entirely.
'Gauge' refers to the Birmingham Gauge system, devised in the 1900's in England for manufacturing metal wire. It later became used for IV catheters.
There are a couple of major differences...
First, as the 'Gauge' number gets *larger*, the IV's get *smaller*. This is the opposite of the 'French' system.
As you can see here, a 14 Fr IV catheter is much larger than a 24 Fr catheter.
Also the 'Gauge' sizes are somewhat arbitrary...meaning the spacing isn't mathematically consistent.
So a 10 Gauge IV is *not* twice the size of a 20 Gauge IV, for example.
If you do the math here, you see these relationships are not linear or consistent.
Finally, as a trauma surgeon, I have to point out one of my favorite teaching points:
The flow rate of a 16 G IV is **twice** that of an 18 G IV. So the difference between those two IV's may not sound much at first, but it makes a big difference for major resuscitations...
⬛️
Of course I have a critical typo in my most-read 🧵😬😤😫
As the picture indicates, these IV's are expressed in terms of "Gauge". A couple of slides ago, I accidentally used the wrong abbreviation in the text.
Also, not to complicate things, but some have pointed out that there’s an exception for vascular access sheaths.
Here the companies have chosen to use “French” to indicate the size of the things that can pass through them.
🧵regarding the technique of 2-handed knot tying.
It's July again, so it's a good time to revisit this 🧵.
2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is worth learning. We'll start with just the basic steps. Advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally *don't* want to start off with uncrossed threads (L picture).
Instead, it's better to cross the two threads first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the threads, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of threads, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L strand can be on top, or the R stand can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.
an underappreciated surgical knot that is used to secure a running suture. It has been shown to be more secure than a square knot.
We will cover how to do it, what not to do, and a modification that may make it more secure. (1/ )
An Aberdeen knot can be used at the end of a continuous (running) suture as an alternative to a square knot.
With a typical square knot, you will either be tying one strand to the two other strands in the loop, either by hand (L photo) or with an instrument tie (R photo).
But the Aberdeen knot is different. Instead of tying to the 2 strands, instead you'll use the single strand to go through the loop that is made by the other 2 strands.
Here, I'm holding the loop open with my R hand and using one of my R fingers to grab the string.
🧵regarding the Bovie, which is one of the most commonly used tools in surgery.
I have decided to reorganize my Bovie content into something that makes more sense, which will require multiple 🧵. This first one will cover the very basics and is geared toward students. (1/ )
Briefly:
Recall that the Bovie is just a tool for completing an electrical circuit that includes a patient's body.
The current passes through the whole system, but because the tip of the Bovie is small, whereas the pad is large, the effect occurs at the place we want it to.
The Bovie is not like the light switch in your house that just turns the current on and off.
Instead, we may adjust the intensity of the current and we can also modify the delivery of current (which the machine calls 'CUT' and 'COAG') to provide different effects on the tissue.
Short 🧵regarding the 'gold' Bookwalter ratchet and one feature that makes it behave differently from the regular ratchet, other than the fact that it rotates.
Also we'll look at a couple of other pointers about the Bookwalter knickknacks. (1/ )
If you use the Bookwalter, you're aware that the tray comes with a large number of the standard 'clicky things' (officially: 'ratchets').
It usually also comes with some gold ratchets (usually 4 of these) and we all know that these *can rotate*.
This rotation of course enables you to rotate the retractor blade when it is connected to the ring. You cannot do this if the blade is connected to the 'regular' clicky thing.
But you may have noticed that the gold ones also just 'seem' better even when they are *not* rotated.