Why did the Director of National Intelligence tell every member of the Senate Intel Committee (Democrats and Republicans alike) that they couldn’t be briefed —even in a classified setting—on the classified documents at issue in the Biden and Trump and investigations?
Members of the Senate Intel Committee constantly review the most sensitive, classified information regarding our national security. It’s their job to review such matters. And yet the DNI said “no.” Why?
Apparently the DNI “is blocking the release of key details of the documents until the Department of Justice concludes its investigations.” washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jan/…
That’s indefensible.
Sen. Mark Warner (D. Va.), the committee’s chairman, said Democrats and Republicans on the committee “were unanimous in the position that we’re left in limbo until somehow a special counsel designates that it’s okay for us to get briefed”; this “is not going to stand.”
“Mr. Warner’s frustrations were echoed by Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the committee. He said the administration’s stonewalling impeded the committee’s ability to do its job of providing oversight of the intelligence community.”
“We simply want to know what was this information, what were these materials that they had, so that we can make an honest assessment when they provide us a risk assessment of whether or not they’re they’ve taken the proper mitigation if any was necessary,” Mr. Rubio said.
“And to say that they’re not going to share any with us as long as the special counsel doesn’t allow them to share it with us, that’s an untenable position and it won’t stand.”
Apparently the private (non-government) lawyers representing @POTUS have been given full access to these documents. Do they have security clearance? Even if they do, there’s no way they have higher levels of clearance than the Senate Intel Committee.
The members of the Senate Intel Committee — Democrats and Republicans — need access to these documents. It’s highly suspicious that the DNI is denying them access, even while the lawyers representing @POTUS have unfettered access.
My friends on the Senate Intel Committee (Democrats and Republicans) work constantly with intelligence community personnel, with whom they always had a great rapport. I don’t recall ever seeing them more united in their frustration with the DNI. They’re TICKED!
And with good reason—there’s something seriously wrong here.
Why are Google and most media outlets concealing the fact that Jordan Trishton Walker—the Phizer executive caught on camera by Project Veritas—appeared to be bragging about COVID gain-of-function research being conducted by Phizer?
Homeboy called the police—not sure what for—when he learned he was being filmed. He then became violent.
He had bragged about COVID being a cash cow. Fair enough—it certainly has been for Pfizer. But to engage in such dangerous research on this virus—for the prospect of making more money—seems like something Pfizer might want to reconsider now that the world knows about it.
This is sketchy, and I’ve got questions. Newsmax—the “4th highest-rated cable news channel in the nation, a top 20 cable news channel overall, and watched by 25 million Americans on cable”—was just canceled by DirecTV … “as a ‘cost-cutting’ measure.” newsmax.com/newsfront/news…
DirecTV also said it “would never pay Newsmax a cable license fee.”
“This is the second time in the past year AT&T has moved to cancel a conservative channel, with DirecTV deplatforming OAN in April.”
.@elonmusk, why does this trigger warning show up on Twitter ONLY when a conservative posts something (usually non-offensive content), but NEVER shows up when a liberal spouts profanity and hate?
I assume this is a remnant of the pre-@elonmusk Twitter—the one that proudly punished conservative speech.
I also suspect this would be relatively easy to fix.
1. In declaring that “democracy itself” is threatened by the Dobbs ruling, this author ignores the fact that (1) Roe was fundamentally anti-democratic, and (2) Dobbs returned lawmaking power in the abortion context to elected lawmakers. apple.news/AkPbuu3uSRQykN…
2. The author—while ignoring the fact that Roe was utterly indefensible on constitutional grounds—then proceeds to attack the Constitution.
3. She proposes abolishing the electoral college and removing the power of state legislatures to draw legislative district boundaries.
This brings to mind a September 2020 classified briefing to senators, when the FBI warned us about misinformation—possibly driven by a foreign government—that was about to come forward about “a member the Biden family.” They said we should neither believe nor share any such news.
Apparently the FBI had similar conversations with social media companies at the same time. Is this the kind of collaboration he’s referencing?
This is a little trick sometimes played by these agencies—make it a classified briefing so members can’t discuss it in public or subject it to public scrutiny.