Since both cases happened under the existing law, clearly they have nothing to do with the #GRRBill. By all means criticise the Scottish prison service's policy regarding trans women, but don't spread misinformation, Joanna.
And also, @joannaccherry, please remember that half of trans people are trans men, who pose no threat to women. Bringing down the #GRRBill would deny legal recognition to trans men for no reason other than ideological hatred.
We don't have Census 2021 figures for Scotland yet, but the most recent estimate for the number of trans people in Scotland is 0.5% of the population, or about 24,000 people. If the same pattern as in England & Wales applies, half of these will be trans men.
So that is 12,000 people to whom you, @joannaccherry, want to deny legal recognition, not because they pose any threat to you or other women, but simply because you disagree with their personal choice. That's not freedom, is it, Joanna?
I am deeply concerned by the fact that opponents of the #GRRBill routinely ignore trans men or, if they mention, imply that their identity is delusional and/or driven by the desire to escape from misogyny.
Ignoring the existence of a minority, and promoting legislation to deny them legal recognition, has an extremely bad history, @joannaccherry. I would expect you of all people, as a senior lawyer, to know this.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So as no-one has the right to enforce gender-critical beliefs on me, I am exercising my right to block anyone who tries to do so. You can express your beliefs somewhere else. My mentions are now a no-go area for you.
I am not going to close replies on threads, nor leave conversations. People who respect human rights and the values of civilised societies are welcome in my mentions as always.
Does "transgender" here include trans men? Both the SPS spokesperson and @TheScotsman appear to be equating "transgender" with "trans woman", once again forgetting the existence of trans men. scotsman.com/news/politics/…
Depending on your interpretation of the Equality Act, it could be viewed as discrimination to insist that all trans people, men as well as women, with a history of violence against women must serve their sentences in the male estate. We do not require this of cis women.
And imho it is clearly sex discrimination not only to fail to consider the needs of trans men but to ignore their very existence when deciding policy regarding the treatment of trans people by prisons, or indeed by any other government institution or agency.
The letter from Sir Laurie Magnus to Rishi Sunak regarding Nadhim Zahawi's tax affairs. gov.uk/government/pub…
Magnus found Zahawi broke the Ministerial Code in three respects:
- failing to disclose HMRC's investigation as part of his declaration of interests
- similarly failing to disclose the penalty imposed by HMRC
- failing to correct an untrue public statement
Magnus also issues an important clarification regarding Zahawi's use of the term "carelessness". HMRC's terminology is "failing to exercise reasonable care". That's much worse than accidental carelessness. It is dereliction of duty.
Jo Coburn is trying very hard to suggest the decision as to where Isla Bryson serves her sentence is a political one. But it is solely an operational decision of the Scottish prison service. MSPs are not party to it, nor does it have anything to do with the GRR. #PoliticsLive
The Scottish First Minister has told the Scottish Parliament that Bryson will not serve her sentence at the Cornton Vale women's prison. That's all we know right now. Anything more is fruitless speculation.
The prison service decides based on their own risk assessment where a trans prisoner should serve their sentence. Their decision does not depend on whether that prisoner has a GRC. thenational.scot/news/23275201.…
At 87, this lady would not have been receiving the new State Pension introduced in 2016. She would have been receiving the old Basic State Pension, which is some £40 per week lower, plus an occupational pension if she had one and whatever SERPS/S2P she had accumulated (if any).1/
If the BSP + SERPS/S2P + occ pension added up to less than the amount the Govt deems necessary to live on, which is a few ££ less than the full new SP, she would hve been entitled to Pension Credit, a means-tested benefit now available only to state pensioners. 2/
Govt estimates that only 7 out of 10 of those entitled to Pension Credit claim it. But as only the poorest and oldest pensioners are entitled to it, that means 30% of the poorest and oldest pensioners are living in poverty. gov.uk/government/sta…
Wondering when @bindelj is going to write a piece fulminating about the epidemic of nose jobs and boob enlargements among cisgender women and, distressingly, teenage girls. Both are major surgery, and nose jobs are irreversible.
The number of trans people who have the sort of surgery @bindelj describes is tiny. But the number of women having invasive surgery every year to make them feel they conform better to "female" stereotypes is in the thousands, maybe even the hundreds of thousands.
I feel angry that a high-profile journo like @bindelj chooses to use her platform to attack a tiny minority rather than exposing the unreasonable social expectations that lead thousands and thousands of women and girls to mutilate themselves.