Nathuram Godse's statement that, "...the 7 conditions that Gandhi had set for breaking the fast started in January 1948 were all anti-Hindu..." We were never told exactly what these terms were when we were taught history in school.
In January 1948
Gandhi was trying for Hindu-Muslim unity through fasting etc. there are superficial references everywhere. So why should Godse say in his speech that all those terms were anti-Hindu?
January 19, 1948 issue of 'The Yorkshire Post' mentions
these 7 conditions. What were the conditions?
Condition 1 - Muslims should be allowed to celebrate their Urus at Mehrauli near Delhi. (There was a mosque of Khwaja Qutbuddin in Mehrauli. It was destroyed in the riots. The Hindus and Sikhs drove out
the Muslims around it. This Khwaja Qutbuddin was supposed to take place on January 26, 1948. But there was a possibility of obstacles in doing so. Gandhi did not want this.)
Condition 2 - Muslims who fled from Delhi should be allowed to return safely.
Condition 3 - Those 118 mosques in Delhi which have been converted into temples should be given back to the Muslims.
Condition 4 - Entire Delhi should be made safe for Muslims.
Condition 5 - Safety of Muslims traveling by rail should be guaranteed.
Condition 6 - Financial boycott imposed by Hindus and Sikhs on Muslims should be withdrawn.
Condition 7 - The remaining parts of Muslim settlements in Delhi should not be used by Hindu or Sikh refugees from Pakistan.
My first thought was, why is protecting Muslims, anti-Hindu?
But then in 1948, why not the same thing for Hindus?Moplah Riots,Direct Action Day,Noakhali etc. saw Hindu Genocide.Violence was happening on both sides.
Didn’t the other sides have the right to protect itself?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Thapars—From Jallianwala Loyalty to Lutyens Supremacy
1/ 13th April 1919. Jallianwala Bagh.
Massacre. Hundreds killed. The world horrified.
But not everyone.
The Edinburgh Gazette, Jan 2, 1920, Pg 28, records the names of those who admired Dyer and O’Dwyer.
One name stands out: Dewan Bahadur Kunj Behari Thapar of Lahore.
2/ Thapar funded Dyer’s reward—Rs. 1.75 Lakhs.
Alongside Umar Hayat Khan, Chaudhary Gajjan Singh & Rai Bahadur Lal Chand.
The head of Akal Takht presented Dyer a kirpan and a siropa.
All this while the Golden Temple was next to Jallianwala Bagh.
Most victims were pilgrims.
3/ Who was Kunj Behari Thapar?
A commission agent for the British Indian Army during WW1.
When the war began, Punjab’s elite rushed to serve the Empire.
But the contractors—like Thapar—profited immensely by recruiting poor youth and arranging supplies for the war.
1.Powered by Soil
Not oil. Not coal. Not tech. The true power beneath our feet is soil. It grows our food, stores our water, balances our climate.
And it’s dying.
My Puran Poli!! 😢
#PoweredbySoil
2.The Numbers Don’t Lie
•Over 33% of the world’s soils are degraded.
•India loses 5.3 billion tonnes of soil annually.
•It takes 500 years to build 2 cm of topsoil.
How long will we ignore this slow death?
3.Without Soil, There Is No Bharat, No World
Our civilization thrived because of fertile rivers and lands. The very word ‘Dharitri’ (धरित्री) signifies the Earth as the bearer. Can we survive if the bearer is barren?
What Dr. Ambedkar said on Gandhi in BBC Interview - Shocking!
1. Gandhi: Not an Epoch-Maker
“Gandhi was never a Mahatma to me.”
In the 1955 BBC interview, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called Gandhi an episode in Indian history, not an epoch-maker. He said Gandhi’s influence was artificially maintained through “celebration and propaganda,” not by transformative action for the masses.
2. Double-Dealing in Three Languages
Dr. Ambedkar exposed Gandhi’s contradictions:
“He had two faces. One for the English-speaking public and one for the Indian masses.”
“What he wrote in English was absolutely different from what he wrote in Gujarati… A man ought to be honest. If he is not, he is a crook. And I accuse Mr. Gandhi of double-dealing.”
3. Strategic Image for the British
Ambedkar was clear:
“Mr. Gandhi wanted to keep up his position in the esteem of the English people. Therefore, he never said anything in his English papers which would displease the British public.”
But in vernacular writings, Gandhi upheld caste and varnashrama.
Bharat wasn’t just colonised for wealth.
It was spiritually hijacked.
To reclaim her, we must awaken the spiritual, intellectual, and martial fire of Sanatana Dharma.
Here’s what they tried to erase — and what we must rebuild.👇
2.📖 The Hidden Mission Behind Colonisation
They didn’t just want to rule India.
They wanted to replace her soul.
In 2018, Cambridge published Stewart Brown’s paper:
“Providential Empire: Church of England & British Empire in India.”
It exposed Britain’s goal — to Christianise India.
3.🧾 Evidence? Here’s Queen Victoria herself
In a letter to Maharaja Duleep Singh post-1857:
“The progress of the railroad will civilise India and facilitate the spread of Christianity, which so far has made but slow progress.”
Their conquest was economic outside, religious within.
When I was doing my Genetics Assignment, here is what I learned:
They told us we were outsiders in our own land. That we came from elsewhere. That our civilisation was born of an invasion.
But science is finally breaking the chains of colonial lies. Here's how 🧵🔥
The Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) was never about facts—it was about control. A colonial myth designed to make Indians feel like squatters on their own soil.
No mass migration. No replacement. No invasion. Let’s look at the genes.
Genetics doesn't lie.
🧬 mtDNA—our maternal ancestry—shows that Indian lineages have not been replaced in 65,000+ years.
🧬 Y-chromosome—our paternal legacy—also shows deep South Asian roots.
We are not migrants. We are the source.
For those crying and screaming “Why wasn’t the WAQF Act scrapped?”
Read this. And read it well.
This isn’t just about scrapping a law.
This is about dismantling an empire.
And Modi is doing it brick by brick.
1. The Act wasn’t scrapped—
It was defeated.
Modi didn’t pull the trigger.
He pulled the teeth.
He didn’t need noise—he needed results.
He changed the rules, neutralised the poison, and tore down its power structure.
2. The Clerical Monopoly?
Smashed.
No more “topi-wearing-only” decisions.
Modi made it mandatory to include non-Muslims and women on WAQF boards.
The old guard can no longer control the narrative. They’ve been silenced by structure.