It has been 'subversive', 'agitator', then 'extremist'. Now the police are labelling campaigners demanding genuine alternatives to the mess Britain is in right now as "aggravated activists". On 15 February 2023, we are reclaiming that label as our own on #AggravatedActivism Day
Amidst a growing intolerance towards the right to protest, Netpol has been keen to remind everyone that protest is not illegal – not yet – but it has become a lot more uncertain. Together, we need to create the conditions to challenge the spread of uncertainty.
That’s why we have called on campaigners to avoid seeing themselves in isolation from others and to understand that the threat of oppressive policing falls on all of us – so we better start offering solidarity to each other.
That need for solidarity was the driver for announcing a day to celebrate our fundamental right to express our displeasure and anger about the mess Britain is now in. We are taking the new label the police see as a negative and turning it into one we are proud to embrace.
Planning a meeting, a protest, a talk, a lecture, a picket or an action in mid-February? Hold it on the 15th - and label it as an ‘Aggravated Activism Day’ celebration. Let us know and we will help to publicise your event.
If you are in London on 15 February, join us for Aggravated! - an evening of dissident comedy with @markthomasinfo to celebrate Netpol's Aggravated Activism Day, at the Museum of Comedy in Bloomsbury. Tickets here: museumofcomedy.ticketsolve.com/ticketbooth/sh…
Watch our campaign video on YouTube at
Side note of the long history of negative labels of campaigners to justify surveillance on them. On Friday the ongoing public inquiry into undercover policing published a Special Branch report from 1983
Entitled ‘Political Extremism and the Campaign for Police Accountability within the Metropolitan Police District’, it smears campaigners for police accountability in London 40 years ago as "significantly influenced by political extremists whose motives are questionable"
One of the groups smeared by Special Branch was a founding member of Netpol, the Newham Monitoring Project. Others include @libertyhq and @INQUEST_ORG. We can only speculate on what the Met is writing about campaigners today. You can read the report here ucpi.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
h/t to @UndercoverNet for highlighting this document (and for reading everything that comes out of the undercover policing inquiry)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
At London City Hall: we are straight into the impact on the poor overworked police of recent protests and none of the panel accept there is evidence the last year is the most intense period the Met has faced. Lord Walnut will eventually of course - but he's late for the meeting
Asked how the Met has dealt with this, Kirsty Brimelow KC makes the point that recent anti-protest laws and the lowering of the level of what is considered "serious disruption" has itself led to a greater willingness to make arrests.
Walnut has arrived. And in a shock to absolutely no-one he says the *weekly drumbeat" of Palestine protests has been a strain on the Met
🧵 Up and down the country, people are starting to organise to resist threats of far-right violence, often on WhatsApp and will little thought of the potential for targeting by police surveillance. A thread on how to keep each other safe
We recommend anyone sending instant messages or setting up chat groups for political organising use a secure platform like Signal, to protect their privacy solidarity.netpol.org/how-and-why-to…
If you are planning to take part in counter-action against threats from the far-right, remember your smartphone carries your entire life on it. Think about how to make your phone more secure before heading out solidarity.netpol.org/setting-up-mob…
Under its new definition of extremism, Britain's far-right government is, of course, more guilty than anyone of promoting "violence, hatred or intolerance" against "the fundamental rights and freedoms of others" and of undermining democratic rights bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
The creation of a new Orwellian-sounding "Counter-Extremism Centre of Excellence" is the indicator of what this new definition is really about: providing the justification for expanding state surveillance on groups that oppose it.
The government promises a "high bar" to decide on who it classifies as "extremist" but the experience of every previous label for justifying intelligence gathering is that it spreads to anyone the police want to apply it to - in absolute secrecy too
We've received more reports that @metpoliceuk is leaning heavily on organisations raising aid funds for Palestinians, undoubtedly as a result of the intervention of the Home Secretary
Yesterday officers pressured one venue where event publicity uses the phrase "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" saying unless it is removed, it could lead to charges for a racially motivated offence. Police also demanded the names and numbers of event organisers
The organisers are not a political organisation, but a community music group. They told Netpol they "feel very intimidated, especially by the police contact, and so made a decision to remove social media content that contained use of the phrase in question"
Huge thanks to @BigBrotherWatch for producing a guide for Netpol on police use of facial recognition at protests, for campaigners and legal observers. Find out how to spot live facial recognition (LFR) vans and help to monitor the spread of this technology https://t.co/0VNjDd0tWenetpol.org/2023/07/31/fac…
Live facial recognition identifies people in real-time, using AI-powered surveillance to compare a live CCTV feed against a watchlist. Everyone who passes in front of the camera will have their face scanned and their ‘face print’ processed.
We expect the deployment of this technology will increase and police will place some protesters on watchlists. In July Northamptonshire Police said LFT at the Silverstone F1 Grand Prix was partially motivated by “illegal protests” theguardian.com/technology/202…
The Home Office has finally confirmed it will collate and publish data on the use of police powers to restrict protests, following sustained pressure from Netpol and our supporters netpol.org/2023/06/20/pre…#DefendDissent
@JustStop_Oil@libertyhq This delay is three years after greater transparency was recommended by Parliament’s @HumanRightsCtte, and comes despite almost all usage of powers to restrict protests resulting from just one force – the Metropolitan Police.
@JustStop_Oil@libertyhq@HumanRightsCtte Frustratingly, the Home Office will require everyone to wait an entire year, until “the summer of 2024”, before protest data becomes publicly available – despite a significant portion of the data already made publicly available via the Metropolitan Police’s social media.