🧵🗞️ Western media reporting on Venezuela is biased almost by definition. We know that going in. But every so often there’s a piece that ticks all the dishonesty boxes. The bad journalism equivalent of a perfect game. You might have guessed, this comes from the @guardian (thread)
It is brought to you by the Bill and Melinda @gatesfoundation. Because we all know no one cares more about honest reporting and “global development” than freaking billionaires
The piece is about a recent proposal from the National Assembly to regulate NGO activities. It’s off to an ominous start w/ this absurdity. How on Earth do NGOs (esp. foreign-funded ones) have anything to do with “democracy”? Corporate journos think western money equals democracy
Before we continue, to find out what the bill is about and what concerns it aims to address, check out our report below venezuelanalysis.com/news/15694
It’s pretty amazing that western outlets (the Guardian drives that bandwagon) see RUSSIAN AGENTS under every rock, yet they want Venezuelan opposition parties to get US funding w/ no accountability or scrutiny whatsoever. Talk about doubling down on those double standards
Gotta get those biased takes out there to steer the reader in the right direction. “Democratic erosion” here is code for “no longer governed by western puppets who granted unfettered access to national resources” or “daring to be independent from Washington”
And voilà! A neat little nugget of western propaganda. Maduro “clings on to power” despite, you know, being democratically elected. There is also something quite important missing in this description of the Venezuelan crisis: murderous US-led sanctions #SanctionsKill
Sanctions are by far the biggest factor affecting Venezuela and Venezuelans’ human rights. Want to guess how many times the @guardian mentions the word “sanctions”? That’s right, a grand total of zero. B/c they endorse the mass murder of civilians in the name of “democracy”
As another aside (apologies for the interruption), make sure to watch our “ultimate guide” on US sanctions to find out all about these deadly measures and corporate media complicity. And share it! #SanctionsKill venezuelanalysis.com/video/15519
A long-time favorite (see here: bit.ly/3JrMkLz). Pretty ironic coming from a source that justified the persecution of Assange and the closure of Russian outlets left and right. Right-wing, US-funded outlets are still way more available here than RT/Sputnik in the West
The false premise leads to an outright lie. It was not “the UN” but a highly contested “fact finding mission” that only conducted anonymous interviews abroad and never set foot in the country. This report has more: venezuelanalysis.com/news/15607
In contrast, other multilateral orgs like the office of the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights have been on the ground. They have been more balanced, denouncing sanctions and also police+judicial abuses (which do exist). Only w/o the goal of justifying regime change efforts
Here’s a look at the kind of voices the Guardian chooses. It’s the journalistic standards for Venezuela reporting that are getting close to North Korea's (i.e. ever lower). Also, “control of food and medicine for political gain,” isn’t that precisely what sanctions aim to do?
Ignore the unfounded “dictator” label and the “widely considered as a sham” elections. That’s the corporate media script, we can’t debunk it every time. The awesome bit is the reference to Guaidó. He was “recognized” as “interim president.” Care to tell us what happened next?
It’s like saying “Hitler invaded the Soviet Union” or “the US intervened in Vietnam” and not saying how that turned out… The Guardian was (of course!) a big enthusiast of the self-proclaimed circus. The article below has a humorous take on Guaidó’s demise venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/15677
This is more ignorance than lying. Hyperinflation is monthly inflation over 50%. That hasn’t happened since December 2020. Accumulated yearly inflation is over 200%, which is a lot, but not hyperinflation. But given the generalized disregard for the truth, this is a minor issue
The quote above is from the corporate media’s favorite faux-left commentators, WOLA. Again, it misses the point, because the NGO-industrial complex has nothing to do with struggles for higher wages. The article below has more on WOLA venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/14902
Bad journalism on steroids. Türk had already left Venezuela and issued a statement (bit.ly/3DOSaDl) TWO DAYS before this disgusting piece came out. He said he “shared observations and concerns” about the bill, nothing about it signaling the end of “democracy”…
Wow, this has been quite a marathon. Our deepest appreciation to those who stuck w/ us til the end.
Remember that VA’s work providing accurate reporting and taking down western media propaganda is 100% reader-funded. You can become a subscriber here: venezuelanalysis.com/donate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵When it comes to reporting about Venezuela, there is no corporate outlet even remotely close to the level of dishonesty of the New York Times. Seriously, it's one piece of misrepresented bullsh*t after another. Follow this thread as we break it down
This is the piece:
The article is not to be taken seriously b/c it starts from a blatant lie. US "prodding" has nothing to do with Venezuela holding elections. It is dictated by the Constitution that they be held this year and they were never in doubt shorturl.at/LFusR
Anyone not high on Western exceptionalism would actually be ashamed of their government meddling in other countries' affairs. But alas, this is the NYT.
In corporate media spiel, "restoring democracy" just means a US puppet being back in the presidential palace
🧵🧵The border dispute between Venezuela and Guyana has flared up recently, leading to a war of words, increased military deployment and increasing signs of US intervention. We have prepared an infographic to explain the history and context of the controversy (thread)
The Essequibo Strip is a sparsely populated, 160,000 square km region spanning to the west of the Essequibo River. It has been the subject of centuries of dispute which, sadly, have never taken into account the indigenous population
Instead, it has always been pretty much about resources. Gold mining is what drove British expansion westward (more on this below), and the recent discoveries of massive oil deposits led to Venezuela and Guyana raising tensions too
About time... Spain's @el_pais reports that the $3 billion in frozen Vzlan assets will soon be released. This was agreed to between the Venezuelan govt and opposition last November! But this thread is to point out the dishonest b.s. from the Spanish establishment's mouthpiece 🧵
This is the article in question:
It essentially relies on anonymous sources who say that the funds will soon be released. El País then covers this fairly straightforward report in a cloak of lies and misconceptionsenglish.elpais.com/international/…
So it begins. How dare Maduro want to access Venezuelan funds? Then it's incredibly disingenuous and racist to claim the govt wants to fix schools/hospitals to "polish its image." If a western govt builds a hospital, it's laudable. If Vzla does it it's to fool voters. GTFOH
🧵🧵Worse than a broken clock... Even when it wants to state the obvious, in this case that sanctions are a terrible and wrong policy, the @nytimes remains fully draped in US exceptionalism. The corporate media are an active front of the US empire (thread)
The article in question () is instantly off to a bad start. We are supposed to agree that Iran and NK should not have nuclear weapons, unlike the only country to ever use them. And would they also call the Iraq war an "egregious violation of intl laws"? https://t.co/ElNZjjKTlTtinyurl.com/3rmur79p
The end of the first section shows that this editorial is really not going anywhere since it's based on the outrageously false premise that the US should have some kind of god-given ability to impose murderous sanctions on other nations when it so pleases
🧵🧵🧵We just came across an incredible piece from the Financial Times (not in a good way). It has a remarkable blend of fallacious arguments, outright lies, bias, and lack of standards. This is a long thread, so bear with us!
This is the article in question from @FT (tinyurl.com/y32pmvtk). You can tell from the off that you're in for a ride because it's based on this assumption that the West "presses for free and fair elections" when this in fact has happened less frequently than Yeti sightings
FT "journalists" must get a bonus for every use of the word "authoritarian." It's not often that a piece starts w/ an outright falsehood, b/c "democracy" never left Venezuela, only the US didn't like election results. But this apocalyptic tone is worthy of a good chuckle
The US-backed Venezuelan opposition, which runs an imaginary parliament, wants a US court to declare a Venezuelan bond as invalid to try and soften the disaster brought by their complete bundling when in charge of CITGO
The strategy haw few chances of success, for several reasons, not least of them that when this National Assembly was actually running it *did not* formally declare the bond issued by the Maduro govt as illegal. A US-backed group was not about to challenge financial investors
.@Reuters will not let a short, straightforward piece get in the way of some outrageous lying. US sanctions have been classified as "collective punishment" against the Vzlan population, and these stenographer clowns write "sanctions against the Maduro govt" #SanctionsKill