On this chilly #thicktrunktuesday, let's take a mid-winter trip to the warm Southwest desert and, to begin, play a quick guessing game. Which of these two trees do you think is older -- the 200' tall coast redwood or the squat, sprawly guy on the right? 🧵1/8
Yes, that desert ironwood (Olneya tesota) has likely been around longer than many much larger, faster-growing redwoods. Ironwoods may not be the most impressive old-growth tree in terms of size, but often very old & important to the Sonoran desert ecosystems where they grow. 2/8
A member of the legume family, ironwoods grow on valley floors & dry washes <2,500 ft in SoCal, AZ & nw Mexico. The name comes from their remarkably dense 'iron-like' wood. One of the heaviest in the world, ironwood is so heavy that if you drop a chunk into water, it sinks! 3/8
Because of their great wood density, aging ironwoods w/cores to count annual rings is difficult. Best estimates show they are often >500 yrs & some are likely as old as 1,500 yrs. Even though most trees are rather short & may even look like saplings, many are in fact ancient. 4/8
Also known as Palo Fierro, ironwoods support a great diversity of desert wildlife, and the tree is considered a keystone species wherever it occurs. For ex: studies have shown the mere presence of ironwood can increase the # of bird species assoc w/ these habitats by >60%. 5/8
Unfortunately, ironwood populations throughout the Sonoran desert are in rapid decline, due to multiple factors -- drought/climate change, utility-scale solar development, agricultural expansion, wood-cutting for charcoal, and competition w/exotic species -- are all involved. 6/8
Ironwoods in different areas are declining for different reasons. In parts of CA's Chuckwalla Valley (west of Blythe), >75% of old trees are dead. Long-term drought & groundwater pumping are most likely causes. Once lost, ironwoods are extremely slow to recover -- if ever. 7/8
“I would not sacrifice a single living desert tree for any book ever written. One square mile of living desert is worth a hundred ‘great books’ – and one brave deed to defend it is worth a thousand.” ~Edward Abbey (Postcards from Ed, 2007)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every article I've seen to date on the Biden Admin's #oldgrowth #forest amendment fails to dig into the details of the proposed policy. Anyone that does will find the initial proposal is filled w/major loopholes & shortcomings, including the following: 🧵 mlive.com/public-interes…
1/ The announcement fails to explicitly include any real, immediate protections for OG remaining on federal lands before/until the proposed amendment is developed & finalized (likely ~2 yrs). In the meantime, remaining OG trees will continue to be logged.
2/ The draft amendment proposes to halt commercial logging of OG forest *stands* -- as narrowly defined by USFS -- but OG *trees* within stands that don't meet strict defns (where vast majority of old trees exist) are likely to remain subject to logging.
It doesn't take a scientist or forester to see that NAmerica's forests are changing rapidly, sometimes in ways never seen before. For #thicktrunktuesday let's review some new terms being used to describe these changes, & take a tour thru America's Forests of the Anthropocene. 🧵
'Ghost forests' are those killed by sea level rise or increased flooding tied to climate change. Bc of rising water tables, once coastal forests die they're unlikely to be replaced. Ghost forests have been ⬆️ rapidly along parts of the eastern seaboard. 2/ washingtonpost.com/climate-enviro…
'Zombie forests' are comprised of trees that established near of the edge of their envrmtl tolerance & are surviving now, but their long-term persistence is likely doomed bc the increasingly warmer/drier climate no longer supports them. 3/ washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/…
This summer I've been observing exceptional levels of recent, widespread tree mortality in the eastern Sierra Nevada. These die-offs are happening across multiple landscapes and species -- likely a result of severe drought conditions exacerbated by climate change.🧵
At lower treeline in both the southern Sierra & White/Inyo Mtns, large areas of pinyon pine (Pinus monophylla) have recently died. Although this species is extremely drought resistant, even they have limits to what is survivable. Both older & young trees have succumbed.
At upper elevations in the central & southern Sierra, conspicuous pockets of tree mortality include red fir, lodgepole, limber, whitebark & even foxtail pines - renowned for their ability to live for centuries on bare, rocky slopes - have been unable to cope w/ these conditions.
...is the role that past logging has played in creating today's forests that are much more prone to large, intense wildfires. This is true not just on pvt and public 'multiple-use' national forests, but also in some cases, national park including Yosemite. 2/n
Most ppl walking thru YNP forests think they're in a protected wonderland, but much of the park's low & mid-elevation forests - what were some of the most impressive pine-dominated forests on earth - were extensively logged between 1911-1942 by the Yosemite Lumber Company. 3/n
When YNP was first created, no money was set aside to buy out existing logging, mineral & grazing rights, so the park had to accommodate these claims. Some claims were eventually bought out or protected thru land swaps, but most were simply exercised. exhibits.stanford.edu/ruderman/catal… 4/n
Last week I toured portions of CA’s Dixie fire (Lassen & Shasta Counties), as well as last year’s Sheep fire & adjacent unburned forestlands. While conditions out there are variable & can see range of fire effects, my overall impressions were disturbing on several levels. 1/12
A large majority of the managed stands/tree plantations burned severely w/near-complete mortality. Not surprising, given that managed stands are often uniformly dense, support high ladder fuel loads, facilitate rapid fire spread & smaller trees have little/no fire resistance 2/12
In places where remnant large/old trees existed before the fire, they tended to show much higher survival than smaller trees in the same stands. If these forests had been dominated by large trees - as they were prior to logging - fire resiliency would be dramatically greater 3/12
There’s something inaccurate and potentially misleading about a lot of media coverage on western forests & wildfires. Many articles mention the end of Indigenous mgmt, fire suppression & climate change as factors responsible for recent uptick in fires - all true, but...🧵1/11
What they often fail to mention is the role commercial logging plays in creating today's more fire-vulnerable forests. This is important because if we don’t understand the main factors contributing to undesirable fire effects, we’re unlikely to choose the best path forward. 2/11
It is well-documented that logging has resulted in the widespread and dramatic loss of large/old conifers in most western dry forests -- these trees by far are the most resistant to fire and historically comprised the "living foundation" of fire-resilient forests. 3/11