I hadn’t realised, as Matt Hancock seems to have just admitted on @GMB, that the image of him was taken on 6th May 2021, when we were still in step 2. This w meant any gathering of more than one person indoors for social purposes was prohibited by law
In his book, he is vague about when the relationship started, I assumed deliberately vague. He may have been blindsided on TV and got the date wrong, I thought it was later, because the image came out later.
I hadn't realised that it had been reported earlier last year that the image was from 6th May 2021 (theguardian.com/politics/2022/…)
I have said before that I suspect Hancock broke the law and now I strongly suspect that. This is because indoor social gatherings were prohibited in law (not just guidance) until 17th May 2021, when Step 3 came into force. Before that, Step 2 was in force
Here is the bit of the interview - he is either confused about when the event happened, or what the law was (wouldn't be the first time), or is being economical with the truth
Finally made it to the European Court of Human Rights - in person! Here to give a lecture on the UK ‘bill of rights’
Very impressive
As I spoke to people here in Strasbourg about the UK's 'Bill of Rights' this line 👇from @HumanRightsCtte report really struck me - UK played such an important role in building the ECHR, then really did bring it back home in 1998. It would be such a tragedy to send it back.
An unsurprising evisceration of Dominic Raab’s inaccurately named “Bill of Rights” by the Joint Committee on Human Rights. They righty say it should not proceed in anything like its current form committees.parliament.uk/publications/3…
The @HumanRightsCtte could hardly find anyone apart from @DominicRaab who actually wants this disastrous mess of a bill to proceed. Which says it all. What a ridiculous waste of time, indicative of this government’s end days
If you want to hear my more detailed thought on this, and more about the 18 year history which has led to this sad point, and are in Strasbourg tomorrow - come along! m.facebook.com/events/8628239…
The current Prime Minister now has twice as many fixed penalty notices as the previous Prime Minister bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Some people will think these things are trivial but as I say in #EmergencyState I think the disregard for the law at the current top of British politics suggests they think they are above the law - that they are somehow different, and special
Remember - fixed penalty notices are given for behaviour which can lead to a criminal conviction - the FPN is a way of avoiding prosecution. Not the most serious offences, but still offences
These are the UK government's reasons for triggering section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998
One initial thought in this thread - I'm sure there will be a huge amount more interesting commentry gov.uk/government/pub…
Relevant bit of s.35:
1 If a Bill contains provisions
b which make modifications of the law as it applies to reserved matters and which the Sec of State has reasonable grounds to believe would have an adverse effect on the operation of the law as it applies to reserved matters,
There are therefore two tests which must both be satisfied: (1) "make modifications of the law as it applies to reserved matters" AND (2) "reasonable grounds to believe would have an adverse effect on the operation of the law as it applies to reserved matters"
Good analysis from a right to freedom of assembly standpoint by Prof. Keith Ewing and Lord John Hendy KC here (relating to previous bill with more limited extent): ier.org.uk/comments/trans…
Just preparing my talk for Sunday - starting with Liversidge v Anderson and ending with the Public Order Bill, will be a whirlwind tour of illiberalness!
Still struggling to believe how extensive the Public Order Bill anti-protest powers are
Also can't quite believe these were the five guys who decided the intricacies of our private and social lives for over two years, with Parliament sidelined...