I confess, I am very, very tired of the gossip machine in Christian academia.
I really do not know how people have the time for it, really. I can barely keep up with all I am trying to do. Maybe preaching regularly helps to keep you out of it? ...
In any case, any person with an iota of seriousness about them could easily determine the truthfulness of this situation, but alas, so many do not care.
So let me say it again: I have stood in the minority Reformed stream for decades in confessing the Son to be ...
Ξ±Ο ΟοθΡοΟ, autotheos, God in and of Himself. This can be documented in my debates and DLs for many years.
You can go back to the summer of 2016 when the EFS controversy broke, and you will hear my stand plainly stated there, and since then.
There is no reason, ...
whatsoever, for anyone, let alone a self-professed Christian scholar, to be confused on this topic, let alone to bear false witness concerning me. The record is clear, plain, and unambiguous.
I cannot stop those in the halls of academia from misrepresenting me, however, ...
we reach a LOT of students, and prospective students, and they may well have ears yet to hear. And when they hear their professors speaking untruthfully, it has an impact. It really does.
So, for the record: I have never, not once, not briefly, EVER, held to EFS, ERAS, etc.; I do not NOW hold to EFS or any variant thereof.
Anyone who says otherwise is at best misinformed, and is at worst engaging in bold faced falsehood.
Fini.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So I have been sent more than I really wanted to know about FBC Orlando's utter capitulation on biblical sexual ethics. Let's just say they are basically a middle-of-the-road United Methodist congregation. OK, lots of those around (though, they are all dying). ...
My question is to all of the leaders of the SBC...all the department heads (NAMB, ERLC), seminary Presidents, etc. You've been told, by some in your own number, that there will be "no place to hide" on these topics. So...what are you doing? You seriously have to make ...
a decision. You either just follow the 11th Commandment and let the SBC sink into the waves of leftist irrelevancy, mocking the BF&M in the process, or you must stand up, find a spine, show some love for God's truth, and demand the expulsion of FBC Orlando. What other ...
@NathanH02907868 Assuming you are a Baptist, Nathan, I wonder why you are using the very phrase the 1689 *did not include* in 1.6? Seems highly relevant, since, of course, "good and necessary consequence" is the very line used to defend paedobaptism which, I assume, you reject. And on ...
@NathanH02907868 what grounds do you reject it? Thomas believed in it. It is THE conclusion of "the Great Tradition." No question about that, right? So on *that* topic you seem to be a...biblicist, then, right? Just checking!
So, outside of specific Aristotelian concepts, are you saying ...
@NathanH02907868 you *cannot* produce a *biblical* basis for simplicity, or the perfect unity of the divine Persons, or the unchanging nature of Yahweh, or that it is just "better" to bring in external concepts and frameworks, like Thomas did?
I simply cannot help but see the judgment of God in the fact that it seems to me that in our day the default reaction of "Reformed" Christians is...divide. Attack. Marginalize. Cancel. No grace, no willingness to disagree agreeably. Label, destroy. Praying seriously that ...
we would come to see that if we don't get rid of this "we may agree on 99.5% of stuff but that .5% is more important so I will reject you" attitude now, out here, in the free world, we won't be able to get rid of it in the gulags, you know what I mean?
When we get to the place where we create our new little theological clique and throw out and despise men that only a decade ago we admired and profited from, we do so to our own harm. And trust me, folks...Scripture has warned us with clarity:
Tell me you are joining the "I will opine, but not actually read" club without telling me you joined that club.
This is the same man who made numerous false claims about me and, though I refuted him fully, with documentation, has never withdrawn the falsehoods.
Of course, I know he does not listen to me or read what I have to say. Nor did he read the GBTS Journal. I know these types ...
very, very well. This attitude is why I attended exactly one ETS meeting and never went back. You see, for these folks, to actually fairly read the journal, or listen to what I have said, would be *beneath* them. A waste of their scholarly time. An act of compromise. ...
GBTS just put out a journal with articles relevant to pastors and the current "resourcement" of Thomas Aquinas. As with ANY criticism of Thomas, first response will be, "You just don't understand/read the right people." This is ...
simply genetic to a fully committed Thomist. Of course, they say that to each other as well, for of the end of intra-Thomistic debate and paper-writing, there is no end. Secondly, it is aimed at all the wrong people: pastors, not scholars. Of course, they are the ones ...
having to navigate the sudden shift in perspectives and conclusions of men they read and followed for decades while counseling and doing hospital visits and living on a shoe-string, so it's not like they need any help, right? So along those lines I predict, "There are ...
Likewise, a friend complained that I am engaging in some kind of "cheap-shot attack" by using terms like Thomists and Platonists. Evidently my friend is not nearly as well read in the sources as he should be. Is it not Craig Carter who insists that the only way to ...
truly defend the Trinity in our modern day is to adopt "Christian Platonism?" Do I need to go back over the references there? I did not make up the term. And I would invite anyone to take just a few minutes to peruse Matthew Barrett's time line, or read through a few ...
London Lyceum articles, or almost anything at all from the Davenant Institute, to see if the term "Thomist" is not only embraced by them, but promoted by them, openly and eagerly.
You truly have to be completely unaware of what is going on right now to have missed this: