Our design builds on knowledge from 11 existing monitoring mechanisms and broad consultation with experts worldwide.
The committee should:
✅ Be independent from political and financial actors in global health
📊 Gather data from a range of sources
🧾 Assess compliance of state parties and the timeliness, completeness, and robustness of reporting
❌only proposes oversight mechanisms assessing achievements and gaps in preparedness capacity
❌doesn't mention independence
❌ mechanism for monitoring overall compliance won't be designed until (at least) the 1st treaty governing body meeting
💥Today the WHO Executive Board discussed the report by the Secretariat on governance for health emergency preparedness and response.
Brief summary of what happened in this 🧵
Dr Mike Ryan explained that the proposals intended to align with, not circumvent, Member State processes.
He emphasized that countries should be at the centre of emergency response and that international instruments must enable countries to implement national plans.
Dr. Tedros stressed
- the report is intended as a living document (that deliberations help refine).
- proposals will maintain momentum and inform INB and IHR processes without undermining them
- WHO's centrality in anchoring a cross-sectoral response in health.