(1) Scott Adams asks an important question which, for the common man, the answer would be that to survive the flood of current alchemical campaigns, you need to have some healthy skepticism of people & institutions that have been repeatedly dishonest and manipulative.
(2) The reason that I knew what was coming is because I simply knew: I had previous knowledge that "crisis" event would be created and that Public Health would be primary means by which the constitution and liberties would be suppressed.
(3) I began to publicly warn nearly every person that I could (conservative, liberal, and those both in and out of my faith community) that a massive coordinated plan to fracture the west was in play - and that @OpenSociety , the @wef, the @UN, and the CCP were behind it.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN (4) Not many were listening, most were highly sceptical. But when it came to explaining the Evangelical Church (in particular, the elitist Reformed variety) was going to assist in the move to disrupt and dismantle the US, I was met with scorn and scoffing.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN (5) I was called a divider, a rumor monger, a divisive man for stating that the Evangelical Elites were bringing in Critical Race Theory and infusing the Church with a critical consciousness. I explained that this was all for the purposes of revolutionary action.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN (6) This would ultimately lead to Balkanization of the US and west, the development of fractured feudalism (hyper-localism) that would, eventually, dialectically lead to supranationalism.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN (7) So for my first conference for Sovereign Nations on October 31st, 2017 - I had only a few evangelical friends (@HwsEleutheroi )that were willing to show up and speak.
I also had a little-known guy by the name of @jordanbpeterson address the conference
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson (9) But, sadly, I had very few Christians who would initially stand with me. In fact, most mumbled under their breaths about the pressure from Mohler, Duncan, Keller and TGC types to jump on board their Intersectional Train but no one would address the issues publicly.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson (10) And thus, the Christian Church would be silent about the issues - due to pressure from "the tribe" and demands to be loyal to the defacto leaders of the community.
So, when addressing these issues, I brought in someone out of "the tribe" to speak clearly: @jordanbpeterson
So I recorded a podcast in my hotel room in Geneva, Switzerland that was titled "The Coming Attack on Jordan Peterson" soundcloud.com/sovereignnatio…
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson (12) And, thankfully, due to the Neo-Marxist Revolutions (that I explained would be coming) at MLK50 and T4G with Mohler, Duncan, Platt, Piper, Dever, Moore and others in 2018 --- you couldn't deny that what I had been warning about any longer.
Literally, no one - not existing seminaries, denominations or parachurch ministries warned the faithful about the Neo-Marxist revolution that was being waged from the inside out in the Church.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson (14) And in my warnings to Evangelical Leaders who finally woke up and broke free to criticize the attempt to create Marxianity, there was the full explanation that we had to steer clear of the ready-made "reaction" of "Christian Nationalism"
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson@RNS (16) And, sadly, with only a few fringe understandings of the issues of the "what" CRT is and not the "why", several ministries decided to declare themselves champions against CRT but pulled short of naming the Elites that ushered in CRT.
because it was obvious that no one would ever be held accountable for the greatest crime committed against the Christian faith: the ushering in of Marxism.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson@RNS (18) And so discussions that I had been having for nearly a year with @ConceptualJames became rather famously public: because Christians had, in 2019, already said "we got it from here" even though they were still clueless.
@OpenSociety@wef@UN@HwsEleutheroi@jordanbpeterson@RNS@ConceptualJames (24) The end result will be epically disastrous if the movement that seeks to enforce Church authority continues down a road that never cleanses the Church from those corruptible men who brought Marxism in the Church in the first place.
"...to survive the flood of current alchemical campaigns, you need to have some healthy skepticism of people & institutions that have been repeatedly dishonest and manipulative."
(1) This evening, protests and the environment for rioting has sparked by the release of the video footage associated with the needless death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis, TN. cbsnews.com/amp/news/what-…
(2) The beating of Tyre Nichols by Law Enforcement Authorities was absolutely cruel and needless - betraying the thin line of trust that a community (and society) must have between the citizenry and those who are entrusted to fairly and impartially enforce our laws.
(3) The Memphis Police Officers involved in this abuse of authority should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
What *will happen* is that this horrific tragedy will be blamed on "racism" and "white systemic racism."
(1) The *big stories* aren't the breaking news like they were 40 or 50 years ago (and even then, suspicious), the truly earth-shattering stories are brought to you by independent journalists and organizations that are not sucked into the corporate news narrative.
(2) Those that are in the corporate media reflexive feedback loop are forced into the dialectical narrative that brings humanity from crisis to crisis to the next "current thing." When individuals oppose these constructed narratives, they are normally rejected by "the academy."
(3) This also applies to the collective, planned, strategized movements in Christianity: the reflexive feedback loops are put into motion, the preferred organizations and "approved" spokespersons are in charge, and the propaganda vehicle is off to the races.
(1) The problem with so many attempting to defend the current reflexive movement of Neo-Reactionary "Christianity" under the influence of Claremont / NatCon is that they don't know *how* to have a conversational debate --- just like the woke.
(2) And just like the mistakes of those who were the champions of the Marxification of Christianity, they always assumed that they were the smartest men in the room. Their work was not exposed to the rigour of the gauntlet of critical peer review.
(3) This is because their work is intended to do the work of techno-populism: to invigorate the passions of the grassroots and create a movement. This is the mistake of so many articles that have been generated by the NatCon/Claremont Neo-Reactionary "Christian" crowd.
The movements of today on both sides of the coin are not "liberal"
They are doctrinally conservative Gnostic/Hermetic religious movements that have embraced the dialectic and the societal alchemical process. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
On the right, you have the Old Hegelians reflexively creating Hegel's Theory of the RIght through gradualism.
On the left, you have the Young Hegelians creating a revolutionary movement through the acceleration of contradictions and out with the old, in with the new
(3) These two movements, while opposing in methodology, still have the same end goal: the creation of the perfected state.
They also have the same goals in eventuality: The technotronic era or autocratic, algorithmic technocracy.
(1) I think what Mr. Hazony and those who are associated with his well-funded fertile fallacies fail to realize is that there are many of us who have been watching with embarrassed silence as this temple to subjectivism has been erected over the past few years.
(2) There are many of us that don't have any intentions of transitioning from fighting radical subjectivism associated with the Jihadist-like invasion of Critical Social Justice and standpoint theory into supporting a poorly produced invasion of Herderean tribal subjectivism.
(3) National Conservativism and their associated partnership with those that are forwarding tribal and ethnic subjectivism, NRx movements and national fracturing apparently believe that they are above critique and criticism - particularly from those that they have deemed enemies.
(1) Back in 2014 when I began to warn Reformed and Evangelical leaders that the "Young Restless Reformed" movement was intentionally targeting an age demographic with generative themes that would lead them into radical wokeness, I was told by many of those leaders... (cont)
(2) that I was following conspiracy theories and that I should be careful in making "these kinds of accusations."
I was warned off in social media groups and ignored by nearly all of the Reformed leaders that were my clients. An exception, @RichPierce14 listened.
(3) Several Reformed leaders said to me "I don't see it yet, but I will be watching".
The most common response to me would be that "I just can't believe that Ligon Duncan, Tim Keller, Russell Moore, Al Mohler would really do this."