"The pill presented an obvious financial opportunity: the rare sort of drug that they’d never have trouble selling, for a condition that would never cease to exist."
2/12
Development of the pills “had the trappings of a CIA operation”
It was so secretive the abortion pill’s backers rented a warehouse and agreed to tell anyone who asked that they were working on a new cancer treatment (the irony is not lost on us).
3/12
They contacted the Population Council (a Rockefeller-founded org aiming to reduce global population growth). It was trying to bring RU-486, the French version of the pill, to the US.
Its distributor, Danco Labs, would be the only US distributor of abortion pills until 2019.
4/12
Testing began.
It doesn’t involve a vacuum aspiration machine, whose suction “feels like you’re getting the life sucked out of you.” (literally)
But the abortion pill is neither risk-free nor painless.
5/12
Despite claims – including the president’s – that the abortion pill regimen is safe, the rate of complications for chemical abortion dwarf those of surgical abortion: lozierinstitute.org/president-bide…
6/12
In fact, chemical has over 4x the complication rate of surgical abortion, and chemical abortions are more than 50% more likely than surgical abortions to lead to an ER visit within a month.
7/12
Meanwhile, the individuals who invested in the abortion pill’s development and distribution have registered profits in the tens of millions.
8/12
And now they’re fighting for the money among themselves.
The court filings show the AVERAGE return on investment for those who invested in Danco was ~452% over 23 years.
9/12
How did they get here? They recruited celebrities to back the project.
“The pill presented an obvious financial opportunity: the rare sort of drug that they’d never have trouble selling, for a condition that would never cease to exist.”
10/12
They lobbied the FDA to approve (and then deregulate) the abortion pill regimen.
Ignoring the known risks, they promoted it to women as a safer, more convenient alternative to surgical abortion (it’s neither).
11/12
Ignoring comprehensive international studies on the harms of the abortion pill, they put profits ahead of women's health
🧵 Responding to "Educators: Medical Fraud at Crisis Pregnancy Centers Should Make Us Rethink Policy" @chicagotribune
The piece contains numerous falsehoods about the good work of pregnancy centers including the professional medical care they provide
1/12 chicagotribune.com/2024/05/24/opi…
The authors liken pregnant women seeking help at pregnancy centers to seeking care for cancer at a substandard medical facility.
They perpetuate the lies that pregnancy centers are not providing quality medical care, and that pregnancy is akin to a life-threatening disease.
2/12
Pregnancy centers support and empower women and families with free vital services and goods.
Surveys demonstrate that 60% of women with a history of abortion would have preferred to give birth if they had more support;
🧵 On February 5th, @Sage_Publishing announced it would retract three of our studies.
All three use Medicaid records-linkage data, the highest quality abortion-related data available in the U.S.
This should be of great concern to the entire research community.
1/15
For over a decade, CLI has been an established voice in the national research community with dozens of published articles and citations in the public square.
The quality of this work and its impact have been undeniable.
2/15
Now, for months, Sage has extended its investigation into a two-year-old study led by Dr. James Studnicki.
The study showed an increase in the rate of post-abortion ER visits following chemical abortions based on Medicaid data:
3/15journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23…
🧵This Mother’s Day we’re celebrating policies and resources that support moms! Read on to learn more ⬇ 1/
Many states have developed Alternatives to Abortion (A2A) programs which support women and unborn children during pregnancy and during the first years of a child’s life: lozierinstitute.org/alternatives-t…
2/
The state of Texas has spent the last 15 years developing an A2A program serving 100,000 Texans with more than 1,000,000 services in 2020 alone.
🧵The rate of abortion-related emergency room visits following a chemical abortion increased over 500% between 2002-2015. Yet the @US_FDA is considering removing longstanding safeguards on the abortion pill. Read on to learn why this is dangerous. lozierinstitute.org/public-health-… 1/6
A new CLI longitudinal study examined the largest universe of actual US pregnancy outcomes ever analyzed, using Medicaid data from 1999 to 2015 which shows chemical abortion is not as safe as the abortion industry claims. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… 2/6
As compared to surgical abortion, women who had a chemical abortion had a:
➡ 22% greater risk of ER visit for any reason
➡ 53% greater risk of ER visit for an abortion-related reason