HML_Compounder Profile picture
Feb 1, 2023 13 tweets 4 min read Read on X
"You should NEVER hold a levered ETF unless you are day trading!!!"

We've all heard this advice, but is it really true? Let's dig in.

Sure, you shouldn't go 100% into $UPRO... you'll end up matching the S&P500, but with nearly 100% drawdowns and crazy volatility. (cont)
But what if you just use a 1/3 allocation to achieve an effective 100% exposure to the S&P500, while freeing up 2/3 for other assets?

Between the vol-decay and higher fees, the drag isn't all that bad... But it would be pretty silly to do this just to hold 2/3s in cash... (cont)
Each of these plots will compare 3 ways to get 100% S&P500 with 66.7% of an additional asset stacked on top :

1: 33.3% UPRO, 66.7% XYZ

2: 100% S&P500, 66.7% XYZ, -66.7% 3-month rate (futures proxy)

3: 100% S&P500, 66.7% XYZ, -66.7% 3-month rate plus 2% (margin proxy)

4: S&P
Lets start with the oldest store of value there is... gold!
Prefer cashflow generating assets? How about some long-term US treasuries!
Like to hold a more diverse basket of assets both long and short, and use trend to determine positions? How about the Mt Lucas index net of 85bp to represent $KMLM?!
Another trend based index from AQR to get a bit further back in time.
Too boring and you need more risk? Okay I doubt anyone really wants this portfolio but how about adding 2/3 stack of US small-value!?

75% drawdown, woof!
None of these backtests are intended to represent actual returns you can expect moving forward, and in some cases not even what you could've got in the past (no trading costs in KMLM index, no costs at all in AQR), but they do show the potential relative utility of UPRO (cont)
In fact, in all cases it outperformed a traditional margin loan with a borrowing rate 2% above the 3-month t-bill, not bad at all, and you can even implement this in a retirement account! (cont)
Does rebalance timing matter? Yes, but that is true of any portfolio, levered or not. Not shown, but rebalance bands may be most appropriate.
Last but not least, here is monthly rebalance between 33.33% UPRO, 66.67% 3-month t-bill, and -100% S&P500 to show the rolling drag.

Neat read on short gamma effect here (H/T @game_book_life):

moontowermeta.com/the-gamma-of-l…
What would you fill your 2/3 with? I bet @NomadicSamuel has some fun ideas!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with HML_Compounder

HML_Compounder Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HML_Compounder

Sep 4, 2022
Someone recently said that manage-futures/trend products without equities (KMLM for example) would not protect as well in an equity drawdown (no equity shorts) so I decided to setup a little backtest to demonstrate that this at-least historically has not been the case...
I started with a simple dataset from AQR that uses 12-month lookback, rebalanced monthly, and has separate returns for long/short trend on equities, commodities, bonds, and fx. Image
I then used risk-parity weighting and made a monthly rebalanced portfolio of all 4 asset-classes, as well as one for the 3 without equities. Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 21, 2022
@jagmavi @rcmAlts @BillBrewsterTBB After deep diving with every moment of free time... I came to the conclusion that I am most interested (and convicted) in a pure trend following approach, and don't want to dilute it with carry, value, or other global-macro type strategies. This is because I want to... (1/x)
@jagmavi @rcmAlts @BillBrewsterTBB ... maintain a relatively small allocation (12.5% today, growing to 20-25% long-term) to damp poor equity periods, and don't care about absolute Sharpe of the CTA portion, so I want convexity. For this same reason I also want as volatile of products as possible, fee-adjusted (2/x
@jagmavi @rcmAlts @BillBrewsterTBB ... I do worry about single-manager risk though so I wanted 3 products. I chose $EQCHX because I like Jerry's pure process, no volatility targeting (let winners run), and no cute additions. I chose $KMLM because it is lower cost to reduce overall weight, but still has a (3/x)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(