THREAD: 1. Reminded today of another requiem mass back in 1996: the funeral of serial paedophile priest Nazareno Fasciale, attended by the late George #Pell six weeks after Fasciale was charged by police for multiple counts of gross indecency & indecent assault of four children.
2. #Pell was soon to become Archbishop of Melbourne. 3 years before, he was on the church’s Personnel Advisory Board which, knowing Fasciale’s crimes, allowed him to retire for “ill heath & stress”. The child abuse Royal Commission found Pell knew real reason Fasciale retired.
3. When #Pell became archbishop, he made a big thing of introducing the Melbourne Response, supposedly to help victims, but really silenced them, forced them to sign deeds of release & gave them paltry compensation. He said he was the first church leader to tackle this crisis.
4. So why did #Pell attend funeral of a man he knew was a child sex offender? I remember researching, being shocked at the pictures of clergy parading into Fasciale’s funeral, the admission by bishop leading that Fasciale “would be the first to confess that he too was a sinner”.
5. And I remember thinking, that it was no excuse, but it was another time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Louise Milligan

Louise Milligan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Milliganreports

Nov 21, 2022
This offensive garbage was sent to federal parliamentarians. Please let me know, MPs/Senators, if you have received same.
1. I’ve never had an abortion.
2. It no one’s business if I had.
3. I’m not writing a book about abortion.
4. Whoever did this is truly vile. 😞
The Australian recently printed lies about me (& has many times, over 6 years). A Senator repeated those lies in parliament. The bullying of women by so-called “legitimate” media platforms encourages psychopaths like this person. It has to stop.
Other journalists who haven’t yet been subjected to this for doing your job, don’t kid yourself that it won’t happen. Call it out, publicly, when you see it happening.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 6, 2022
More inaccurate misinformation by The Australian. The ACT Bar Association President quoted approached me, introduced herself as “Bec”, thanked me for my speech, was very friendly, spoke for ages and asked me to contact her about story collaboration. This situation is chilling.
2. She showed no sign of concern about “insensitivity”, wanted to work together. The Australian misquotes me as saying “all barristers who acted for defendants in sexual ­assault matters are ‘part of the problem’.” I did NOT say that & told The Australian. They didn’t run denial.
3. I won’t link to story because it’s factually incorrect. I’ll publish in full what I did say to The Australian in the morning. But right now I am just gobsmacked & frankly, hurt, by what I took, at face value, to be a decent, professional person who seemed grateful for my work.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 2, 2022
THREAD on (typical) misinformation by The Australian: 1. Recently, I delivered a speech to Women Lawyers ACT on my book, Witness. I was publicly congratulated by ACT Supreme Court Justice Chrissa Loukas-Karlsson, the Women Lawyers ACT President & the Victims of Crime Commissioner
2. Afterwards, other women (& men) thanked me profusely for the speech. @erosenman - CEO of ACT Women’s Legal Centre, wrote: “It was such an important and timely address and I know a lot of the women felt really seen by the WLA’s choice of speaker and Louise Milligan’s comments.”
3. I was contacted by a pundit at The Australian who didn’t attend & didn’t have the speech. She put to me multiple inaccuracies about the speech, including phrases I never used. I replied they were demonstrably untrue. She ran inaccuracies anyway, without my individual denials.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 19, 2021
THREAD: This Thursday, June 24, people will light #ACandleforKate. June 24 marks 1 year since a woman called me about sexism in Canberra. She was scared of consequences of speaking out. Neither of us knew of Kate. Neither of us knew that that morning, Kate took her own life. 1/
2/ The woman urged me to investigate the problems of sexism in Canberra. I began to make calls and the next day, those calls led me to Kate’s lawyer. He felt sure that Kate would want a meeting with me and said he’d speak to her that night. Neither of us knew that Kate was gone.
3/ The next day, I spoke to another friend of Kate’s I’d tried to reach. When I told him why I was calling, he sounded like he’d been kicked in the stomach. He said he’d call back. When he did, he told me Kate took her life two days before. I won’t forget that feeling.
Read 7 tweets
Mar 1, 2021
THREAD: 1. Following is a letter sent to @australian from a real friend of the Cabinet Minister complainant - a man who knew her for decades, not months. And, incidentally, a lifelong Liberal. I’ve been inundated with messages from her old friends, horrified in the way he is.
2. “I was shown a copy of your attack piece on the ABC for apparently ignoring the wishes of the family of a woman who died and made allegations against a cabinet minister. I have to say, this was one of the worst hatchet jobs I've seen in journalism in a LONG time...
3. “If you want to have a kick at the ABC, go for it. But please don't use my friend's death to do it. The fact that she died is tragic. The fact that you quoted only one 'friend' of the deceased - who only knew her for a few months...
Read 6 tweets
Feb 17, 2021
THREAD: 1. Here’s a message I received from another another Liberal staffer this morning, tweeted & anonymised with her permission: I am a former LNP ministerial staffer...culture is rife and accepted as an every day occurrence. And there is no recourse to have it dealt with...
2....because your job is constantly threatened & so is any future job you might want. There is also no proper oversight body & I know first hand if you try & raise any issues they will not be dealt with; but you sure will be. I think the current review...
3... needs to ask former staffers about their experiences. There is a reason we are former staffers and not current ones. I worry that any review using current staffers will be skewed. I am too scared to speak out publicly because I worry for my career into the future if I do.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(