You’ve made whatever point you wanted to make by imprisoning him and claiming (quite misleadingly) that you’re treating him the same as you would a Japanese national. You’ve made your point poorly and counterproductively, but whatever—it’s time to bring your standoff to an end.
Let’s face it, @kishida230, you’ve got a really good security arrangement with the United States, and you’ve had the luxury of not having that arrangement discussed or seriously questioned in Congress for a long time. That’s about to change.
Why would you rock the boat by throwing one of our best and brightest in prison for three years—all because of a car accident that, tragic as it was, resulted from a non-foreseeable medical emergency.
If you transfer Lt. Alkonis back to the U.S. before midnight on February 28, 2023, we will do our best to forget that this whole thing never happened. It will be hard, but we will try.
If, however, he’s not on U.S. soil by then, many of us will work equally hard to make sure America knows (1) what a good security arrangement you have with the U.S., (2) what you did to one of the best and brightest our military has to offer, and (3) what we should do about it.
If you’re willing to do this to Lt. Alkonis, why should we trust that you won’t do the same to others? As our brave men and women are keeping you safe, what are you doing to make sure they’re treated fairly and respectfully?
The fact that you—like Lt. Alkonis—are far away from us doesn’t mean that your actions will go unnoticed here.
Out of respect for you and your relationship with the United States, there are a lot of us who have remained relatively quiet about all of this, hoping that it would give you the chance to do the right thing.
I still hold out hope that you will. But my approach to all of this is about to change.
And make no mistake, it will change if Lt. Alkonis isn’t back on U.S. soil by 11:59 pm EST on February 28, 2023.
I love Japan, and am grateful for the relationship our countries have long enjoyed. Please keep it strong, and don’t weaken it as you have by imprisoning Lt. Alkonis.
It’s time for a candid discussion of what you did to Lt. Alkonis and his family. It’s time to heal this senseless wound. It’s time to #BringRidgeHome.
🇯🇵 🇺🇸
出る杭は打たれる
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Given that (1) we’re giving Ukraine weapons to use against Russia, (2) Russia has an abundance of nukes, and (3) Russia is increasingly expressing hostility toward us, at what point should we worry that our arms deliveries might prompt Russia to attack us? tinyurl.com/5y65n47d
Is there any point at which the War Powers Act could be triggered by our delivery of weapons to Ukraine?
Should the answer to the first two questions determine whether a declaration of war or a congressional authorization for the use of military force is necessary for the U.S. to continue giving Ukraine weapons to use against an increasingly hostile Russia?
When supplying weapons to a nation at war with a nuclear-armed adversary, at what point will that adversary consider itself to be at war with the United States?
To what degree should that consideration matter to us? And at what point is a declaration of war (or an authorization for the use of military force) required?
Should the inquiry focus on whether the weapons we’re supplying are offensive or defensive in nature?If so, what qualifies as “offensive”? If that’s not the standard, what should be?
Why are Google and most media outlets concealing the fact that Jordan Trishton Walker—the Phizer executive caught on camera by Project Veritas—appeared to be bragging about COVID gain-of-function research being conducted by Phizer?
Homeboy called the police—not sure what for—when he learned he was being filmed. He then became violent.
He had bragged about COVID being a cash cow. Fair enough—it certainly has been for Pfizer. But to engage in such dangerous research on this virus—for the prospect of making more money—seems like something Pfizer might want to reconsider now that the world knows about it.
Why did the Director of National Intelligence tell every member of the Senate Intel Committee (Democrats and Republicans alike) that they couldn’t be briefed —even in a classified setting—on the classified documents at issue in the Biden and Trump and investigations?
Members of the Senate Intel Committee constantly review the most sensitive, classified information regarding our national security. It’s their job to review such matters. And yet the DNI said “no.” Why?
Apparently the DNI “is blocking the release of key details of the documents until the Department of Justice concludes its investigations.” washingtontimes.com/news/2023/jan/…
This is sketchy, and I’ve got questions. Newsmax—the “4th highest-rated cable news channel in the nation, a top 20 cable news channel overall, and watched by 25 million Americans on cable”—was just canceled by DirecTV … “as a ‘cost-cutting’ measure.” newsmax.com/newsfront/news…
DirecTV also said it “would never pay Newsmax a cable license fee.”
“This is the second time in the past year AT&T has moved to cancel a conservative channel, with DirecTV deplatforming OAN in April.”