Jon Moses Profile picture
Feb 2, 2023 26 tweets 10 min read Read on X
While we take stock of big, new losses in Dartmoor, I want to take a moment to talk about the micro enclosures happening every day around the country. They’ll never make the headlines. But they completely shape the way we live our lives.

This is mine. 🧵
Near where I live is an old weir. I know weirs are bad for rivers but I'm extremely fond of it. I swim here. I watch the dippers when I’m sad. If I need to clear my head, this is where I come. You can sit on its wall, water at every side, and simply be.

It’s part of who I am.
But about 15 years ago @NatResWales decided to mitigate the weir’s impact on the river. Salmon were struggling to make their spawning grounds. Trout numbers were in decline.

The weir was another obstacle in a deteriorating ecosystem, beleaguered by agricultural runoff upstream.
Rather than destroy the weir - now an 18th century heritage asset - the solution was to build a series of fish steps.

£600,000 of public money was (rightly) spent to construct a ziggurat of ponds the fish could use to bypass the weir walls.

It's... well, it's pretty cool.
But at the same time, a hydroelectric station was constructed at the behest of the adjacent landowner, to power his giant Tudorbethan mansion and the grid.

The weir channel was extended to service it. The public bridge was removed and the new access routed through his land.
And so, the little enclosures began. A padlocked gate went up.

Now, instead of walking across an open bridge on public land, you had to vault this wooden threshold.

And so went the access of anyone old or infirm.

And so too the access of anyone not brazen enough to cross.
No problem for me: I’m pretty brazen. But then I’m a cocky white boy. It’s easy for me to be brazen.

I continued my visits to the weir.
But I was not the only person for whom the weir served as a weird, unofficial sanctuary.

Despite being a rural area, access to the immediate countryside here is actually very limited: especially to the river. You can read more about that here:
The weir was one of the few accessible places nearby that wasn't a tarmacked track, or a trashed, industrialised forest, or a barren, mud-wrecked field.

It was a place to come, to watch, to think, to not think at all. A place to *be*, rather than to simply pass through.
Most of all, it was beloved by the young.

Sliding down the weirfall has been a rite of passage for decades. It is that ideal, interim space teenagers love best: somewhere you can sense you maybe aren’t *officially* allowed. But where there is nobody to stop you either. Utopia.
Yet the value of such places are rarely registered by the state.

Kids don’t write feedback forms, or respond to public consultations. “I want a place to get the fuck away from my parents” is not considered a legitimate metric of public wellbeing (though it should be).
Kids don’t see the world like the State. So the State doesn’t see them either.

To @NatResWales the weir is just an awkward heritage asset. It's not a designated bathing spot, even though it is. It's not a nature reserve, even though it is. It's not a place to play -- yet it is.
Now, it takes more than a padlocked gate to stop most kids going where they please. So an arms race began.

First, chains were installed as a deterrent.

Then, during lockdown, security cameras started to appear...

Our peaceful idyll was steadily transforming into Fort Knox.
I continued my visits. Now with a wave at the cameras, or the occasional rude gesture.

I gathered the agri-trash that washed up on the islands. I watched sparrowhawks hunt unfortunate pipistrelle. I hammocked beside the crashing waters, and awoke eye level with the kingfishers.
But I noticed that less kids came and far fewer adults. Only the brazen continued.

It affected me in other ways. When my mother was terminally ill, I couldn't take her to see the birds - she had no chance of climbing the gate. I tried to describe my visits. It wasn't the same.
I wrote letters to @NatResWales, who ignored me. I wrote letters to the landowner, who ignored me too.

The fishing association does its best for the river, but seemed suspicious of anyone pushing for better access.

The local councillors didn’t seem to care.
Then one day I had a set-to with the landowner’s gardener. He refuted the existence of the old bridge, whose supports lined the channel between us. He told me terrible tales of the “sex and drugs” teens had been having. “Cool”, I thought. It was clear my antagonist did not agree.
Last month came. Mr Darwall won his wild camping case. And I was feeling seriously strung out from back to back days organising protests against it.

“Go outside”, my lovely @Right_2Roam co-organiser hissed. So, as usual, I went to the weir...

...and found this in the way.
Can’t climb that, I thought. Heart sinking. Not without sore fingers & serious drama.

So it goes: a strata of my self-geology. At the whim of some guy who puts giant marble tigers on his drive.

I’m not used to that feeling. I'm used to brazen buying me a lot of spare freedom.
But the next day I discovered the limits of brazen were not quite extinguished. With a delicate traverse, I could swing round the fence and get back to the weir.

But so goes access for another, final, group of people. I doubt we’ll see many children here this summer.
In isolated communities it can feel like you're the only one who cares about such things - or willing to do something about them.

Enclosure happens where resistance is low. Customary rights are stripped away not because they're just, but because they can go unchallenged.
Spaces like these are important. They're part of a constellation of possibility. They facilitate different thoughts, enable other kinds of conversation.

With each enclosure we lose alternative ways of being. They don't exist in government designations. But they matter.
As I headed home, I glanced down at a shape in the silty residue.

A footprint.

A naked footprint. Must be a swimmer – in January! Must be brazen. They had found a way through fences, chains and cameras to maintain possibility.

Somewhere, in my wee rural suburb, is a friend.
So this year @right_2roam is going local. We want to help people across the country fight the enclosures happening because of the invisible lines dividing us, as much as the physical fences which separate us.

Get in touch at: righttoroam2020@gmail.com. All we have is each other.
P.S @NatResWales - you appear to have the time and money to massacre the riparian trees at the weir, and mow down the bushes in which I saw my first ever firecrest.

I reckon you've got the time and money to restore the access you took away. How about it? 🙂
UPDATE: if you have a story of your own local micro-enclosure then the Press Association would love to hear from you for a story.

Reply to this thread or email danny.halpin@pa.media with the details. Include as much evidence / context as possible!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Moses

Jon Moses Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jm0ses

May 14, 2024
People have some bizarre (and sometimes, unhinged) ideas about how humans move in the landscape when they're given unrestricted access.

No, they don't trample every bluebell. Nor do they carry out search & destroy operations on every bird nest.

Here are some examples 🧵 Image
Local to me. Not a right of way, just a popular informal desire line linking the suburb to a nearby footpath (sections of our Right of Way network are only functional *because* of such informal paths).

I'll repeat: not an official footpath. Yet look how disciplined the line is. Image
Most good habitat is naturally defensive.

This wood has open access: you can theoretically go anywhere you like. In practice, when paths make sense - people use them.

Note how the relatively healthy, scrappy understory negotiates a natural relationship with human presence. Image
Read 11 tweets
Dec 30, 2023
Some brief thoughts on the ethics of hunting and where we draw the line.

I think there are basically six interrelated criteria against which you can evaluate the legitimacy of shooting & hunting practices:

-welfare
-utilisation
-conservation
-meaning
-scale
-respect
1. Welfare

How is the animal killed? A clean shot from a skilled marksman is clearly preferable to dogs chasing frightened quarry across the landscape before ripping it to pieces, abetted by humans on horseback. What skill threshold is in place before shooting can take place?
(Yes, as followers of the Nature Is Metal Instagram know all too well: nature is more amoral than that. But we’re not talking about natural predation, we’re talking about an artificial human intervention. It’s right that welfare is a factor).
Read 13 tweets
Jul 25, 2023
Where to start with this @FarmersWeekly piece on @Right_2Roam which seems to have no idea what is being proposed & bemoans the loss of opportunities to "monetise partnerships with healthcare providers as solutions to the UK’s health and wellbeing crisis".
fwi.co.uk/news/opinion-r…
Firstly, the RTR proposals are not an "all-access approach". They simply mean exclusions should be justified on reasonable grounds not arbitrary whims.

What those are is up to us. You can see the list of exclusions used in the Scottish model, which we would like to adopt, here.
Image
Image
It means the "inner city kids" the author invites for one-off visits to his farm are empowered - yes, have a *right* - to experience the 'spontaneous high' of nature in their own time, on their own terms, at their own discretion, in a way which might *genuinely* be spontaneous.
Read 15 tweets
May 24, 2023
Last week @UKLabour clarified its vision for an English Right to Roam Act, looking to the Scottish model to replace “a default of exclusion with a default of access”. But what does this mean and why is it important? 🧵
Currently in England there is around 8% of access rights to land, and 3% of (undisputed) access to rivers.

This primarily consists of the footpath network [0.3%] (as much of 49,000 miles of which may be missing) and open access land, covering ‘mountain, moor, heath and down’.
Most access land derives from the Countryside & Rights of Way Act (2000). In some parts of the country, it’s great. The Peak District for instance has around 72% of land dedicated to open access, providing a much used, and well loved, place for people to access the natural world.
Read 21 tweets
May 18, 2023
As parliament debate #AccessToNature today, a personal essay.

Deep in my valley is a tree so old it makes my bones ache. There are only a handful like it in the country, and its boughs harbour some of our oldest stories.

Yet almost no-one has ever seen it. 🧵 Image
That’s because it resides on a 5,000 acre private estate at the border of England & Wales.

The estate is old: Norman Conquest old. With the same family, the Scudamores, holding it since the 11th century.

But the tree is older still... Image
The Jack O’Kent Oak is named after a folk trickster of the border country, famed for outwitting the devil. Jack is said to have tied his hounds to the tree’s trunk, and discoursed with the devil from its branches.

He is our valley’s Twm Siôn Cati. Our poundshop Doctor Faustus. Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 27, 2023
UPDATE: I met the farmer doing this yesterday. The conversation we had was NUTS. He's tearing down all this amazing successional habitat, which has been naturally afforesting for about fifteen years, so that he can get paid to plant... Trees.
The Welsh Government have said they want farmers to have 10% tree cover on their land. But because they haven't specified the conditions, the farmer said he needs to "keep his options open" -- by removing as much existing, natural tree cover as he can.

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-…
I said surely this would be considered woodland by now and that he'd need a felling license.

Nope: he'd been visited by @NatResWales who said it was fine because the trees weren't big enough. Which de facto means you can fell one of the most important habitat types that exist.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(