Has anyone done a deep dive on the privacy and security implications of Netflix fingerprinting your home WiFi Network and essentially creating a record of when you are home or not … just to crack down on password sharing?
Oops, I was like genuinely asking not trying to do numbers but here we are. A reporter reached out to me about my thoughts on this and I'm still formulating but here's what I've got:
I mean in some ways there's nothing super unique about what Netflix is doing. Most websites you visit will know your IP address, rough location, what browser or OS you're using, etc.
That said, it's notable that Netflix blocks VPNs (to prevent people from streaming content that's not available in their area) which is a pretty shitty security practice, especially since some people use VPNs to literally keep themselves safe and hide their location from gov etc
And there is something somewhat different about just sort of generalized knowledge "this device is connecting from this network" and building a system that is constantly checking where you're logging into Netflix from.
But beyond the privacy stuff this whole move just kinda reeks of desperation. Like, it's hard to imagine this is gonna really generate all that much more revenue for Netflix?
I think @doctorow and @rgibli "Chokepoint Capitalism" basically is the definitive take on why this is happening and why it sucks. Cory has a great thread here that's smarter than mine i'm pretty sure
And of course lawmakers need to do their jobs and pass a real data privacy law strong enough to effectively abolish surveillance capitalism as a business model. Stop messing around with nonsense like #KOSA and banning TikTok and actually rein in Big Tech & commercial surveillance
idk if you're still here read this op-ed i published earlier today. it's on a different topic but just as important fastcompany.com/90843990/senat…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
weird to me how many organizations that say they want to "rid the Internet of disinformation" never seem to say anything about the fact that police routinely lie as a matter of practice, and that crime rates and statistics in the US are essentially a giant disinfo campaign 🤔
it's just funny to me that an entire industry has formed around the idea that people lying on the Internet is the greatest threat that our society faces, but it willfully refuses to call out the biggest source of lies because it's looking to those same systems to stop the lies
been reading @prisonculture and thinking through what an abolitionist lens on disinformation looks like. it's so far from the current way most mainstream progressive organizations are thinking through this issue: looking to more censorship & surveillance and policing as solutions
Madison Square Garden used facial recognition to identify and stop a mom from attending a Christmas show with her kid because she's an attorney at a firm who is engaged in litigation with them.
This is exactly why it is NOT ENOUGH to just ban government and law enforcement use of facial recognition and biometric surveillance. There are so many ways private corporations and even individuals can abuse this tech. It should be banned for all commercial use & public use.
Facial recognition surveillance should be banned in all "places of public accommodation" as defined by the ADA. Portland, OR already passed a citywide ordinance that does this. We need to recreate that at the Federal level and then make this a global norm fightfortheftr.medium.com/why-we-absolut…
1. Write a Christmas song in the style of Blink-182 2. Write a song called "Christmas at the Gay Bar" 3. Write a song where Santa fights the fascists 4. Write a Christmas song set in Boston
I honestly don’t know why I made this. Partly to distract myself and cope with holiday depression, partly as a commentary on the way that artificial intelligence is invading the art and music world, and partly because I kind of love Christmas music... evangreer.bandcamp.com/album/automate…
I honestly need to talk to my therapist about why I did this, but…
I gave ChatGPT prompts like
“Write a Christmas song in the style of Blink 182”
“Write a song where Santa fights the fascists”
Then I wrote and recorded music for the songs
🤶 EP coming tomorrow. I’m sorry
I am genuinely thrilled with how this weird project came out and terrified about the implications of AI for art, music, human rights, and the world. This project will only be available on Bandcamp & it will be a benefit for @fightfortheftr’s work to strictly regulate unethical AI
For a 2 of the songs I took the first thing that Chat GPT spat out, word for word, and set it to music. For two of them I would "regenerate" a bunch of times until I got something I kind of liked & for one of them I hacked together the "best" (worst?) parts from different "takes"
THREAD: There has been a fair amount of discussion about how, even with the changes, the #KidsOnlineSafetyAct (or #KOSA) would be weaponized against LGBTQ+ folks & especially queer and trans youth.
But there's another huge problem with the bill: it would censor abortion content.
#KOSA creates a broad "Duty of Care" for tech companies that goes way beyond dictating what kinds of privacy or security they need to have in place and gets the government involved in dictating what kinds of content they can allow or recommend to minors.
The bill tries to keep this narrow by saying the duty of care only applies to specific impacts on mental health (as defined by the DSM), or predatory, unfair, or deceptive marketing practices" prong (Sec.3a6) or "physical violence."
But the new version of the bill still poses a significant threat to LGBTQ rights, abortion access, privacy, and free expression.
The "Duty of Care" model that #KOSA takes is fatally flawed when applied to content regulation / user speech. You can tweak the definitions all you want, but in the end you're giving Attorneys General like Ken Paxton a massive cudgel to to threaten platforms over allowing content