There's a nurse named Victoria Kavanaugh listed in this article who conspires to kill patients with chronic illnesses that require costly treatment in order to save her employers money. She lies, quashes reports, and works to coordinate this behind the scenes because its her job
Big insurers feel way too massive and complicated to fight properly. When the latest in a long line of ethical atrocities is uncovered, CEOs shrug-pass the buck to underlings who point at each other-HOW could *I* have known!?
But they REQUIRE competent administrators to function
Those competent administrators are invariably regular people, with names, who want to live comfortable lives, make comfortable salaries, and who have found ways to justify to themselves, internally, why they do the work they do - and they move about in the world unnoticed.
These people are moral blanks - they do not do their jobs due to their ethical convictions, or devout religious beliefs. Its just the most expedient way for them to furnish comfortable lives for themselves. If that was no longer the case, they would stop doing it.
Curiously in the wake of Pro Publica's article United Healthcare's Victoria "Experienced RN Admin-demonstrated history of working in the health care industry. Skilled in Patient management, compliance structuring..." Kavanaugh of Plano TX seems to have taken her linkedin offline
Seems her life may have become less comfortable
One thing the internet - frankly, this website especially - has done remarkably well is assemble and train elite teams capable of working seamlessly together to shit up ordinary individual's lives for sport. Navy Seals of annoying people. This has limited pro social utility.
But I humbly submit it there might be one or two things its genuinely useful for.
Food for thought!
UwU I love it when we all come together to help share resources to help give valuable feedback
The correct opinion is:
- Flower prints are overused and often uninspired. Designers ought to have to obtain a special license to use them. The placeholder of prints
- There are VERY few acceptable excuses for non-autistic people to wear striped clothing
- Plaid is a neutral
- Tie dye is vacuously cheerful. That's fine.
- Camo IS for sluts. That's fine
-Polka dots look twee or whoreish. There's worse things to be.
- Zebra/tiger prints are ok
- Distinguishing cheetah and leopard is sus. Why as a man etc. Anyway - no new leopard print. We're full.
True story, my mom tried to raise me gender neutral -no pink, no barbie- mostly tons of STEMy toys actually. Problem with that sorta thing is you’re only as strong as the weakest parent at school-1st day she picked me up I was like ‘WE GOTTA LOOK INTO THIS NEW SHIT CALLED DOLLS’
The worst way this backfired prob came when I got my 1st formal dress. Once wearing one was a possibility, I insisted on dressing formally for dinner every night. Like an aristocrat in exile. If my mom wouldn’t help me get dressed, i would scream til she gave in, or I passed out.
I have many stories like this. My parents told me I WOULD play a team sport, my policy was "death before chase ball". Then the peewee soccer team got hot pink shirts. I joined for the exact time it took to get one, then refused to continue.
I've always been very outfit motivated.
Btw i will be 33 on the 18th so, you know. I think this year will really be my year. To learn to drive. In uh. In new york. The chillest possible place to um…practice that?
Whatever. I identify as an - antiracist mrs daisy? (Ive never seen the movie)