Mark Goldberg Profile picture
Feb 3 16 tweets 11 min read
Normally, I would keep clear of the controversy about @AmiraElghawaby's appointment as Canada’s Special Representative on Combatting Islamophobia, but I think there is an unfortunate overlap with the #LaithMarouf debacle, which gives me a modicum of authority to weigh in

1/13
Apparently, @CdnHeritage does not have access to internet search engines, which should concern all those watching the various pieces of Digital legislation passing through Parliament. But I digress.

I'll focus this thread on the charge of @AmiraElghawaby being anti-Quebec

2/13
The offending column, co-authored by @BernieFarber appeared in the @OttawaCitizen 3½ years ago: ottawacitizen.com/opinion/column…

The key offending paragraph cites data sourced from a @leger360 poll

3/13
Note that the 88% figure is a hyperlink, that in turn links to a @mtlgazette article by @JasonMagder from two months earlier: montrealgazette.com/news/local-new…

It describes a poll of 1,212 Quebecers commissioned by @CanadianStudies, offered exclusively to @mtlgazette and @LeDevoir

4/13
The @JasonMagder article is indeed the source of the 88% figure: "Among those who have negative feelings about Islam, 88 per cent support a ban on religious symbols for public school teachers."

But here is the rub: It doesn't say what % has negative feelings about Islam

5/13
I think that there is a measure of innumeracy that is driving this matter - at least as far as @AmiraElghawaby's views of Quebec.

The @mtlgazette article tells us 28% of those polled had a positive view of Islam and 37% had a positive view of Muslims, but ...

6/13
But it is silent on how many gradients were in the scale, how many were neutral, and most importantly, how many were counted as having negative feelings about Islam.

Without that, the 88% figure cited in the @BernieFarber - @AmiraElghawaby article is useless.

An example:

7/13
It is mathematically possible that only 9 of the 1,212 people polled answered in a way that got categorized as "negative feelings about Islam". If 8 of those 9 supported the ban on religious symbols for school teachers, that would yield the 88% figure.

8/13
Unless @BernieFarber and @AmiraElghawaby had the full study, there is no way they could conclude (as they did) that "the majority of Quebecers appear to be swayed not by the rule of law, but by anti-Muslim sentiment."

That was the premise for the entire column.

9/13
Speaking as a statistician, I am concerned about the possibility that innumeracy led to an offensive generalization about Quebec, and indeed that may have inappropriately shaped the views of the authors.

It would be fascinating to see the entire poll, questions, results.

10/13
I can't find links to the poll itself

As noted by @CanadaCRIC (@leger360 is a member): “CRIC’s standards provide an important tool for journalists to ask the right questions about polls and to do a thorough job of vetting facts before they publish them with their byline.”

11/13
Bottom line: if @AmiraElghawaby, @BernieFarber misread the 88% figure and concluded it was the percentage of Quebecers supporting a ban on religious symbols on teachers, then they should retract the @OttawaCitizen article in its entirety, since it's based on flawed premise

12/13
Finally, the innumeracy among so many (and I see it a lot in my day job, as frequent followers know) concerns me.

Too many people don't have an ability to look at numbers in the paper and sense that something doesn't smell right.

But I'll save that for another day

13/13
About @leger360 web-based survey cited by @AmiraElghawaby and @BernieFarber: In 2019 (when the survey was done), Quebec had Canada's lowest rate of internet use. @Statcan shows ~1 in 6 Quebecers (age 15+) didn't go online, so it couldn't really be a representative sample

PS1/13
The survey has a very misleading statement about accuracy: "For comparison purposes, a probability sample of 1000 respondents would have a margin of error of ±3.09%, 19 times out of 20"

But this wasn't a random sample, so no margin of error could actually be given

PS2/13
Lessons:
• Journalists need to learn how to question surveys, per @CanadaCRIC: canadianresearchinsightscouncil.ca/wp-content/upl…
• Before you write: "the majority of Quebecers appear to be swayed ... by anti-Muslim sentiment", be sure you have reliable data, and someone to check the data twice.

PS3/13

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Goldberg

Mark Goldberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mark_Goldberg

Feb 2
There's been lots of chatter about the negotiated "off-tariff" wholesale services agreement between @Rogers & @Videotron

@TeksavvyBuzz filed a #CRTC Part 1 complaint that includes a section on these rates, as well as rates being charged by @Bell to @EBOX_CA

Some thoughts

1/6
The Teksavvy complaint can be found here: teksavvy.com/wp-content/upl…

As Teksavvy acknowledges, negotiated agreements have been permitted since 2008. In 2012, #CRTC updated filing requirements to simply a summary of general details for review

crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/20…
2/6
The #CRTC rulings on Negotiated Agreements call for filing them on the public record. I wonder if the complaint about the Rogers - Videotron agreement is premature, given that until the deal closes, just as a matter of law, does an agreement even exist to be filed?

Lawyers?
3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(