The Metropolitan Museum says this head was carved in the 6th century BCE. I think it was made in Greece in the early 20th century. Why? Let me explain... Image
The man on the right in this 1895 photo is John Marshall. From 1905-1928, the Met Museum paid him to buy antiquities for them in Europe. His archives, with info about many of these purchases, were just put online last November (thanks, British School at Rome!). ImageImage
(Side note that the man on the left is Edward Perry Warren. Marshall was his secretary. They lived together and had matching dogs and signed their letters to each other "Puppy." Later, Marshall married Warren's cousin. They're all buried together. (Not the dogs.)) Image
On February 14, 1909, Marshall wrote to Edward Robinson, assistant director of the Met, excitedly reporting on "an archaic Apollo for sale at Athens." The Met didn't buy it, probably because someone (maybe Gisela Richter) identified it as a pastiche of two existing sculptures. Image
If you overlap the photo with the Melos Kouros (c. 550 BCE, discovered in 1891 and now in the Athens National Museum), you see it's pretty much an exact copy. Image
The head is harder to see in the photo, but the fringe of hair on its forehead doesn't look like the Melos Kouros - instead, it resembles another sculpture in the Athens National Museum, the Volomandra Kouros (560-550 BCE, discovered in 1901). ImageImage
I think the sculpture in the 1909 photograph from Marshall's archive is a fake - a pastiche combination of the Melos and Volomandra sculptures, which would have been easy enough to do using a pantograph or other form of mechanical pointing and sizing from plaster casts. ImageImage
I started wondering what became of this 1909 sculpture. If the seller(s) in Athens couldn't find a buyer for the whole thing, might they have tried again by dividing it into parts? I remembered the Met's head... Image
Marshall bought the head in 1921 for the Met from Michel L. Kambanis, an Athenian dealer. Here's Marshall's inventory card. Image
The head is pretty beat up and looks kinda weird. Previous scholars have condemned it as fake, but the Met's curators have said no, it was just treated with acid and recarved in modern times - hence the extra lines around the eyes and the truly unfortunate duck lips. ImageImageImage
Met curators also point out the similarity of the face and hair to the Volomandra Kouros. As you see from my overlapping photos, they are similar but by not means identical. But... ImageImageImage
If you float the Met head over the 1909 photo, it's exact - down to the number and arrangement of the locks of hair. ImageImage
My guess is that sometime between 1901 and 1909, a forger made a full-body sculpture by combining two ancient models. When that failed to sell, someone cut off its head and hacked it up enough to disguise it from buyers like Marshall who had already seen a photo of the whole. Image
I tweeted about the Met's famed kouros sculpture earlier today: . He's also close to two different ancient sculptures: his body closely resembles the Sounion A Kouros (found 1906) and his head the Dipylon Head (found 1911). ImageImageImageImage
Being similar isn't a sure sign of forgery, of course. More worrying is something Vinzenz Brinkmann noticed in a 2017 publication: the Met kouros' hair is of an anachronistic shape. Brinkmann thinks he must have been repainted 100 years later. But... ImageImage
... the near-perfect preservation of the Met sculpture has always been explained by the theory he was buried relatively soon after he was carved. How can that fit with 100 years of weathering while waiting for a new manscaping style? Image
Another very interesting detail: the height of the 1909 sculpture, as recorded in Marshall's letter, is a centimeter less that the height of the Met kouros. Image
Did our forger, frustrated in 1909, get enough inspiration from the new discovery of the Dipylon Head in 1911 to try again? The Met paid $150,000 for their kouros in 1932 ($2.6 million today) - a powerful incentive! Image
I'd be very glad to hear any thoughts one way or the other, on any of these sculptures - thank you in advance!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erin L. Thompson

Erin L. Thompson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @artcrimeprof

Feb 3
I've spent months trying to figure out how the famed 6th c. BCE kouros ("youth") sculpture got to the Metropolitan Museum (any many Art History 101 textbooks), and I think I figured it out. A thread:
Let's start in 1932, when the kouros made his debut, his left leg "slightly advanced as if her were preparing to board a taxicab." Newspapers around the world were gaga for him - and no wonder, as one of only around a dozen well-preserved sculptures of this type from Greece.
But the kouros made headlines of another sort a few months later, when an Athenian professor claimed he must have been smuggled out of Greece with the connivance of antiquities authorities. (Love the mugshot photo.)
Read 18 tweets
Jan 4
A European collector who feels a "sensual" connection to sacred Himalayan artworks bought enough of them to surround his bed - and then fill a private museum. A thread on my review for @hyperallergic, in which I get very🤢and😡 - and then ask where these artifacts came from... ImageImage
A new book contains some of c. 350 6th-18th century artifacts from Tibet, Nepal, Bhutan, Burma, and northern India held in the "Tibet Museum–Fondation Alain Bordier" in Gruyères, Switzerland, which bills itself as one of the world’s largest collections of historical Buddhist art. Image
The book opens with a biography of Alain Bordier, who spent 30 years buying Buddhist artworks, which he “gathered around” his bed in a room he describes as “my den, the room in which my father died.” Assembling these sculptures made him feel like “the creator of a new universe.”
Read 17 tweets
Dec 14, 2022
Let me tell you a little story about a stolen Buddha head that was up for auction this week in Paris and the time I met a living deity who was watching a Western in the corner of his shrine...
When I went to Nepal, I had the great privilege of visiting a shrine of Dīpaṅkara Buddha in the town of Bhaktapur with Birat Raj Bajracharya, a scholar of Nepali Buddhism. He explained that the shrine's priest is considered a living deity - always on call for the Buddha.
The priest stepped away from his tiny TV in the shrine's antechamber and climbed into the shrine to light butter candles for us as an offering.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 28, 2022
In c. 1940, a student named Katja Meirowsky cut the swastika out of a stolen Nazi flag, sewed the rest into a dress, and wore it to her Berlin art school. This act nearly led to her death - and shows how important art for protest can be, if only to save the artist's own soul. 🧵 Image
Katja had already been denounced by a fellow student for making a joke about Hitler. She arrived at her interrogation in borrowed silk stockings and high heels; the Gestapo officer released her after she promised to go sailing with him on the Wannsee. (She didn't.) Image
Katja kept protesting as much as she could, in a Berlin where even a joke could land you in jail. When she walked into school in her new red dress, fellow student Cato Bontjes van Beek said, “My God, there’s the revolution in person” - and recruited Katja to the Red Orchestra. Image
Read 20 tweets
Aug 19, 2022
[snaps on rubber glove] Let's dissect this museum press release!

Did the Met really determine antiquities in its collections were stolen from Nepal and offer to repatriate them all on its own, as they claim?!?

(Spoiler alert: 🙄) Screenshot of museum press release at https://www.metmuseum.Screenshot of section of museum press release reading "
First up, a 10th c. stone relief of Shiva. The Met claims "recent Museum research" based on a book, Bangdel's Inventory of Stone Sculptures of Kathmandu Valley, "determined" it belonged in a specific temple in Nepal. This book? Published in 1995.
Maybe it took the museum 27 years to get around to paging through one of the only relevant reference books on this type of sculpture? And that's "recent" enough for them? Oh, wait, but let's see if there might be anything else that happened recently...
Read 11 tweets
Aug 19, 2022
The Met Museum is complaining that Cambodia won't give it all the info they have about the theft of the art they're claiming. Let's talk about why that's a massive act of solidarity with other countries seeking repatriation. 🧵 nytimes.com/2022/08/18/art…
Background: thanks to the confessions of former looters, archeological investigation of sites to discover remaining fragments, and the files of a big former dealer, Cambodia can trace the route of many antiquities exactly: theft to dealer to buyer. But... nytimes.com/2021/11/21/art…
...while Cambodia knows exactly how the 45 antiquities they've asked the Met to return to them were stolen and illegally smuggled out of the country, they've simply given the Met a list, without this info. Why? nytimes.com/2021/10/24/art…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(