Joe Profile picture
Feb 4 37 tweets 9 min read
I don’t want to oversell it, but what you are about to read may be the most important thread I have written. We need to talk about Article 5…No, not NATO…
🧵👇🏻
Most people associate Article 5 with NATO. Rightly so. It’s a big deal. It’s the one that basically says an attack on one, is an attack on all and it was invoked after the 9/11 attacks. But we’re not going to be talking about that Article 5 today.
We are going to be talking about Article 5 of the US Constitution that sets forth the procedures to amend the Constitution. We specifically need to understand the part about 2/3 of State legislatures having the ability to force Congress to call a convention to propose amendments.
Elected officials at the federal level (i.e. US Congress) can get together and call for amendments to the Constitution as well. They’ll pass so long as they have the votes of 2/3s of members present. This is how all 27 amendments so far have been made.
The last time an amendment was made, it had to do with pay for Members of Congress, and was made in 1992.

Before we begin, we need to understand how important amendments are.
Amendments are a BFD. Each one re-writes the Constitution. They make more clear who we are as a country. They sit atop everything. They *are* the Constitution. The job of a Supreme Court Justice is to interpret them and make rulings in accordance with them.
That 👆🏻should be enough foundation for our purposes. Constitutional lawyers and scholars can clean that up as they see fit.
Here is a link…

constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/a…
As I said, all 27 amendments thus far have been done via introduction by a Member of Congress and 2/3 of both House and Senate approval. Once that occurs, 3/4 of the States (38) then have to ratify (agree to) that amendment. This part of the process is super important…
Right now there are 33 amendments that have been approved via Congress. But Joe, the Constitution has only been amended 27 times…The reason for this is because not enough States have ratified those other amendments.
An example of an unratified amendment is the Equal Rights Amendment. Yes…there are States that have refused to ratify an amendment to our Constitution that would guarantee Equal Rights to the women of America (📌1). The Equal Rights amendment was approved in 1972.
Who could be opposed to an Amendment that guarantees equal rights in a country that basically gains its self esteem on telling everyone how all here are treated equally?
Phyllis Schlafly is not advocating against earned run average.

npr.org/sections/thetw…
But, this thread is about Article 5 and specifically the process used to force Congress to call a convention to propose amendments. Amending the Constitution is a difficult process. It should be. We’re changing the country when we make an amendment. It’s a big deal.
The path to a constitutional convention* that leads through the State Legislatures themselves, has never successfully yielded an amendment.

*I’ll call it a constitutional convention, maybe technically called something else like Convention of States, I don’t know, but you get it.
The path through the State legislatures to an amendment seems to me to be the harder of the two. Think of it. Two thirds of the States (34) would have to agree to hold a constitutional convention where amendments could be proposed.
They do this by passing resolutions to hold a convention. 34 States need to pass bills. An elected official offers a bill, it passes the state legislature, and is signed by a Governor. Each local election builds the infrastructure necessary to pass laws.

So what have we built?
This map is the reason for this thread. It shows that there are currently 19 States who have already passed resolutions calling for a Constitutional Convention to propose amendments.
This is a map that shows the States with a Trifecta of single party leadership. That is to say the State’s House, Senate and Governor are all of the same party. There are currently 22 States with a Republican trifecta. That is 16 away from the 38 needed to ratify amendments.
Joe, 16 States is a lot. Never gonna happen.

Fair…but go back and count the colors on the first map again. If you don’t want to, there are currently *34* States that either have already agreed, agreed in at least one chamber of the legislature, or are talking about it now!
Every State is a swing State when looked at through this lens! Colorado, Nevada, Ohio and Michigan would be enough for Republicans to ratify any amendment they wanted!
Amendment 28 - Abortion is prohibited.
Amendment 29 - Gay Marriage is prohibited.
If enough Republican led State Legislatures wanted to, they could make anything “legal”.
Vote didn’t come out like you wanted?
Amendment 30 - Only Republicans can hold office.
CRT frighten you?
Amendment 31 - No Public Schools.
Amendment 32 - In part repeals portions of Amendment 1 in that the official religion of the US will henceforth be Christianity.

Amendment 33 - repeals Amendment 13….you see where this is headed.

We will lose our democracy because we fail imagination.
Geez Joe, get a grip.

I know, I know…there would have to be a dedicated group who worked specifically toward a goal like getting enough States to even have enough votes for a convention to make changes to the Constitution, and no one would ever do that…

Right?
Meet Convention of States Action.

See if any maps or Endorsers are familiar to you (📌2).
conventionofstates.com
It’s strange how some of these threads come into being. In reading through the January 6th Committee’s deposition documents, there is mention of a ‘coalition’ who were involved in putting on the rally on Jan 6th. Coalition is mentioned in Carolyn Wren and Amy Kremer’s testimony.
Ali Alexander, pictured below, also used this ‘coalition’ term in his testimony, and I came across this in the Taylor Budowich depo. He was sort of in-between Wren and Katrina Pierson from the WH. He says the ‘coalition’ included the Tea Party Patriots. [record scratch]
Would that be the same Tea Party Patriots founded by Mark Meckler? The same Mark Meckler who also founded the Convention of States Action who produced that map of the potentially 34 States who would be willing to call for amendments to the Constitution?
👇🏻🤦🏼‍♂️
And here is just a sample of those endorsing this project. Mark Meadows who received texts from Ginni Thomas about the 2020 election raised a few eyebrows. Ken Blackwell who had suggested Ken Klukowski and John Eastman brief VP Pence in an email broadcast by the J6C…
They’re even endorsed by the president of the Schlafly Eagles, Ed Martin, who not only posted that picture of Ali Alexander on the 6th, but when the J6C had questions for him, had this to say…
Wait, Schlafly Eagles? Schlafly…sounds familiar…

Oh right…🗣️🎙️the still unratified EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT FROM 1972!
Please understand they are determined, patient, well-funded, and will not stop until they have our democracy.
I can’t stress enough how important local elections are. They show just how close each of us is to changing this country. With our vote, we could be bringing about Constitutional amendments that enshrine our values, or eradicate our rights.
They may be using the democratic process, but I can assure you this ends with the democracy dead and us living under their rule. Follow the money. Vote in local elections. Save our democracy.
Reporters…report.
The Convention of States Action website shows 44 ‘Endorsers’.
11 appear on the whiteboard.
5 have CPI ties
4 voted against election certification
1 is chairman of Conservative Partnership Institute.
Finally, John Eastman sits on their legal board.
📌1 was about the Equal Rights Act as it pertained to women. Perhaps we should amend that to include people of color, the indigenous, gay people, disabled people, trans people, sick people, hungry people, all people.

People, we’ve got a lot of work to do.
The dominoes are falling against our democracy.

Gerrymander…suppress opposing voters…win State trifectas…remake the Constitution through amendments.
For anyone still reading this, thank you. I also just want to point out something that I think is important. Nowhere in this is trump. Do you see how trump was just a means to an end? They used him as much as he used others. He’s a pawn in *their* game.

They’ll find another.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joe

Joe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DempseyTwo

Jan 26
Senator Feinstein sits on the Senate Intel committee. Adam Schiff was kicked off the House Intel Committee. Adam Schiff has been prosecuting trump for years and they are sidelining him.
In CA, the Governor has the power to appoint the replacement Senator if a current one retires.
I want to be clear, I am not calling for Sen Feinstein to do anything. I am just laying out the facts as they are. If the above somehow does take place, we have to see it as a move to counter the actions taken by Speaker McCarthy. That begs the question why sideline Schiff?
My mind is blown just thinking about this. What could possibly be so important as to essentially usher out a sitting Senator, for one who has been prosecuting trump and just got kicked off the House Intel committee…where he was just Chairman.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
Good Saturday Morning everyone!

It’s a new year and I thought maybe I’d try something completely different.

Fiction.

We’ll see how long it lasts. Not long I suspect. A wee tale about Jack…
Jack was soaked. He stood in what looked like an endless field of debris and destruction. He had no idea that it could happen that fast. Jack was in a daze.
Jack had only moved to town 2 months ago. He hadn’t even changed his driver’s license to his new State yet. That was the furthest thing from his mind in this moment.

Where was Marcy?
Read 19 tweets
Jan 16
MLK continues to speak to us through history. Each year, I read ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’. With each passing year, I hope this is the one we have moved forward in a manner where his words become less applicable. Alas, this is not that year.🧵👇🏻

digitalcollections.libraries.ua.edu/digital/collec…
‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail’ was written in 1963 by a man running thin on patience, trying to open a civilized dialogue with intransigent fascists retaining their grip on the status quo in a white dominated country expecting Black people to continue to wait for equality.
“Now is the time to lift our national policy from the quicksand of racial injustice to the solid rock of human dignity.” ⁃ Dr. Martin Luther King, 1963 “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”
Read 5 tweets
Jan 15
On December 5, 2022, Desiree Cormier Smith addressed the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent, in Geneva, Switzerland. Cormier Smith is the United States Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice. Her opening remarks are here. 🧵👇🏻

geneva.usmission.gov/2022/12/05/spe…
That was pretty deep, huh? Trans-Atlantic slave trade, Anti-Black Racism, Global devaluation of Black lives. These are issues we need to understand so we can properly address them. To better understand the issues, we need to talk about them. Good thing the group is ‘Permanent.’
I imagine they are talking about systemic racism in this group. How governments treat the issues, what their responses are, how important their elected officials think these issues are is important in resolving them.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 12
Did you notice each time republicans get punished for wrong doing (i.e. violent rhetoric), they use it to move the needle further right? They’ll talk of ‘goose and gander’ or say ‘Dems started it’ but always leave out the reason why; hoping we forgot.🧵👇🏻

npr.org/2021/02/04/963…
The same stuff happens in the Senate too. Remember that time Mitch McConnell changed the rule around Supreme Court nominees to be a simple majority vote? It was in response to former leader Sen Harry Reid making executive appointments a majority vote.

Why did he do that?
It was because Mitch McConnell wouldn’t allow *any* executive nominee to get a vote. This wasn’t just for judges. McConnell was preventing Obama’s nominees for things like Federal Reserve Chair, and Secy of the Department of Homeland Security. That seems an important one.(📌1)
Read 8 tweets
Jan 11
If probable cause exists to search for missing classified documents at Biden’s thinktank or any other locale, then the legal process should play out. Biden should seek a ruling from a judge he appointed, have his lawyers lie about returning all the docs, then find more docs…
This sounds crazy, right? But if it were the first time hearing about doing any of those things in the context of a president keeping classified information you might understand the outrage. That’s the thing about false equivalencies, though. They’re false.
When it comes to the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, trump supporters have been told the investigation is just another witch hunt. Another means of tearing down a great man. ‘So what’ if the former president left the WH with some magazines mixed in with a few golf balls?
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(