The picture of brightly coated troops marching slowly to the beating of drums remains one of the most striking visual images of 18th century warfare. But did troops move at greater speeds on the battlefield? TL;DR, they often were flexible and ran if they needed too. 1/15
To students of the British Army in the American War of Independence, this should not come as surprising news. Matthew H. Spring has recently shown that British soldiers fought unconventionally in North America. However: this trend goes beyond North America and the AWI. 2/15
18th century soldiers were often rational actors, and made competent decisions based on the needs of the moment. This willingness to respond quickly was not a special feature of the British or Prussian armies, but common to almost all 18th century militaries. 3/15
Jacques Mercoyrol de Beaulieu, a French veteran of the War of Polish Succession in the 1730s, recalled the types of battlefield movements possible in heat of the moment: 4/15
"In these battles, (which were all victories) the Picardie Brigade... moved almost as in a race: the most nimble arrived first, their arrival awakened courage and new strength to those already engaged in combat." 5/15
Prussian soldiers under Frederick the Great occasionally moved with great speed. The official war journal of the Prussian Fusilier Regiment of Jung-Braunschweig makes this clear: 6/15
"In order to reach the position... we had to pass a long dam, which delayed us. So, in order arrive [on] time, we had to run past the village of Arhem: the regiment was not in perfect order. The enemy were already advancing on us at the quick step, and we engaged them." 7/15
General von Lossow recalled that as soon as the firing began, "the orderly lines fell by the wayside, as they did whenever troops advanced through terrain... Units only needed to keep in contact with the other parts of the line, as the army of Frederick II knew well." 8/15
Johann Jakob Dominicus, a musketeer in Frederick II's army, also remembers running at Prague. He wrote, "our left wing had its work cut out for it, and we had to run with energy, in order to get under the enemy guns." 9/15
Historian Matthew H. Spring exhaustively shows that British troops moved at a kind of jog or trot. In the American War of Independence, British soldiers moved quickly as part of usual practice, rather than speeding up when the circumstances demanded it. 10/15
Roger Lamb recalls that the British moved forward at Guilford Courthouse, "in excellent order, at a smart run, with arms charged."At the same battle, the normally slower Hessians s in the Von Bose Regiment joined the British advance with speed: 11/15
"We then came to a fenced wheat field; on the other side of this field 1500 continentals and militia were deployed in line... I formed the battalion into line with the greatest of speed and we ran to meet the enemy in tolerable order." 12/15
Other German allies of the British, the Brunswickers , moved at speed during t the Battle of Freeman's Farm on September 19th, 1777. Hearing the English troops engaged Baron Riedesel moved out, "as quickly as possible," and launched his final attack, "at the quick-step." 13/15
It is important that we do not overdraw these examples. Most European commanders valued ordered bodies of men, and preferred to attack in an orderly fashion. However, in moments of crisis, European officers frequently took it upon themselves to move bodies of men at speed. 14/15
Whether in Europe or North America, these soldiers were not automata: they moved at the speed demanded by the situation. For the footnoted quotes, see: shorturl.at/kwE24 15/15
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A short thread on 18th century desertion. How serious was desertion for armies in this period? TL;DR, They weren't all running off at the first loud bang. The British, Hessians and Prussians deserted less than we think, and the Continentals struggled a bit with this. 1/11
Any sort of exact average figure, when dealing with multiple armies, over the course of the 18th century, is difficult. By way of a rough estimate, perhaps 11% of soldiers deserted, though that figure was much smaller during peacetime, and potentially greater in wartime. 2/11
However, it may be possible to venture a more accurate guess when figures are separated by era and army. We will begin data from armies over long periods of time, and then move to figures connected with the Seven Years' War era, and move to the American War of Independence. 3/11
Well, I'm currently stuck at an airport waiting on a delayed flight to a military history conference, so here is my promised thread on uniform research. Again- I'm more of a social-military historian, so this might not be radically new to you uniformologists out there.
This post follows one uniform detail and my search for answers regarding it. My hope is that it will provide material culture enthusiasts with a step-by-step processes for evaluating and answering their own questions regarding uniforms from the 18th century
A few years back, I became interested in the uniforms of one of the most iconic mid-eighteenth-century military units: The Reusch Hussars, or Hussar Regiment 5 of the Prussian Army.
A myth-tackling thread. Looking at the British redcoats, modern Americans often claim that they were, "Too dumb to take cover." TL;DR, during the whole eighteenth century (and in Europe too), the British would lie down under fire and take cover on the battlefield. 1/17
First of all it seems as though this practice was incredibly common. So common, that it might even be considered a normal British practice . Unlike the shallow, open-order formations used by the British in the AWI, laying down under fire did not come from North America. 2/17
Also, it should be noted: the troops performing this tactic are battalion company soldiers, not light infantry of any sort. Where possible, I have avoided sources from light or provincial units, in order to establish that regular British soldiers employed this tactic. 3/17
So I am a social historian, most of the wargamers and reenactors I talk like talking uniforms. 🧵
How impractical were 18th century uniforms? How can we take armies that wore bright colors, lace, and powdered wigs seriously? TL;DR, uniforms were often practical and adaptable.1/15
Uniforms are used as a piece of evidence to assert that eighteenth-century warfare was inefficient, formalized, and foppish. So, how ostentatious and formal was 18th-century military clothing? Did uniforms hamper the ability of European soldiers to effectively wage war? 2/15
It is said that the bright red uniforms of the British infantry made them easy targets, to be individually picked out by American riflemen. Although this may true in very specific cases, by and large, the American War of Independence was not fought by drab colored riflemen. 3/15
A Sunday reading list. I'm often asked by wargamers, reenactors, or military history enthusiasts, "what should I read on this topic?" This is a list of the 5 books that capture the reality of armies and warfare in the 18th century Atlantic World. Links below. 1/10
As professional historian, you read a lot for comprehensive exams (in my case, four 8-hour tests on 261 books writing 20-30 pages from memory). shorturl.at/wBIPQ Not all books are great and helpful. Some are on theory rather the realities of combat. These 5 are great. 2/10
Start at the top and work your way down. Some of these are expensive, so to paraphrase Will Hunting, Don't be like me at drop $150,000 an education you could have for a $1.50 in late fees at the local library. (if you don't get the reference, ) 3/10