Alright, #SMBTwit asks and it receives!

So, lets break down entities and how to smartly create and form your HoldCo entity structure.

Grab a mimosa, and let's dig in! 🧵
Step 1: Determine if there will be more than one party (e.g. partners or third party investors) at any level of the structure.

If yes, stop. Hire a lawyer. More on this below.

If no, go to step 2. (1/x)
Step 2: If all entities will be wholly-owned (e.g. only one person or entity will own each subsidiary), determine entity form (C Corp or LLC, generally).

If C Corp, stop. Hire a lawyer. More on this below.

If no, go to step 3. (2/x)
Step 3: If you're forming an LLC, determine if you're going to make a S Corp election.

If yes, hire an accountant to be sure that you understand the implications for the timing of the election.

Then go to step 4. (3/x)
Step 4: Form your LLC. You can use a lawyer if you want to, but honestly for a wholly-owned LLC it's not the end of the world if you want to use a service.

But you probably don't want to DIY this so that you can be sure you observe proper formalities. (4/x)
There's a concept called "piercing the corporate veil" whereby someone suing your LLC and can "pierce" the limited liability nature of the entity and recover directly from the member if certain formalities aren't observed.

So you want to set your entity up properly. (5/x)
That means passing proper authorizing resolutions upon organizing your entity and adopting a written Operating Agreement.

If you just go search google and pull a random form, you run the risk of getting key items wrong, even in a wholly owned LLC. (6/x)
I've seen operating agreements provide for partnership tax treatment (not allowed for a single member LLC) or for management by managers when entity is formed as a "member-managed".

You should have an operating agreement and it can be simple, but it should also be correct! (7/x)
So let's circle back to step 1.

Why stop and hire a lawyer if there's more than one party involved?

A few reasons:

1️⃣ Complicated governance
2️⃣ Compliance for equity investments
3️⃣ Stakes go up considerably

(8/x)
1️⃣ Complicated governance

At a minimum, if you have partners (even if you don't have third party investors), the governance is complicated.

Once you add investors, the governance gets even more complicated.

(9/x)
A few governance considerations when drafting governing documents:

▶️ Timing and method for capital contributions
▶️ Timing and amount of distributions/dividends
▶️ Management rights
▶️ Protective rights
▶️ Buy/Sell agreements
▶️ How to handle deadlocks

cont... (10/x)
▶️ Transfer restrictions
▶️ Equity structure (class and rights)
▶️ Corporate opportunities
▶️ Reporting requirements

Just to name a few!

A good, comprehensive operating/shareholder agreement will be long and complicated, Well worth the cost to get it right. (11/x)
2️⃣ Compliance for equity investments

Taking investments from 3rd parties requires more than just taking money and adding them to the cap table.

Anytime you sell equity to a third party, it has to either be registered with the SEC (an IPO) or exempt from registration. (12/x)
General in SMBs, the sales are exempt under Rule 506 of the Securities Act.

Securities laws are complicated and the risk of getting it wrong can be massive...rescinding the investment and effectively bankrupting your company. (13/x)
Most lawyers aren't securities lawyers. It's a unique and complicated area of the law.

That means many solo and small firms don't have malpractice insurance for this area of law. (14/x)
Do your due diligence to make sure you hire someone that knows what they're doing and has insurance so that you are protected!

For more on Rule 506, see this response thread from my partner @SMB_Attorney. (14/x)
3️⃣ Stakes go up considerably

Simply put, with partners/investors, litigation risk goes up exponentially. You face litigation risk not only from third parties but also investors and partners.

But if your entity is wholly-owned, you're unlikely to sue yourself... (15/x)
Next, lets revisit Step 2.

Why hire a lawyer for a C Corp, even if it's wholly-owned?

LLC's are largely contractual entities outside of the basic formation.

Corporations, OTOH, are largely governed by statute that can be overridden by certain contractual arrangements. (16/x)
Remember that whole "piercing the corporate veil" we referred to earlier?

Lack of proper corporate formalities is one of the primary ways for a plaintiff to successfully win that argument. (17/x)
Because corporations are governed mostly by statute and not contract (like LLC's), setting up the bylaws and shareholder agreements correctly is imperative to maintain limited liability.

You'd be shocked at how many DIY single shareholder corps I see with no bylaws... (18/x)
So where does that leave us?

Even if I don't recommend it, a single-member LLC can pretty effectively be done DIY, or using a cost-effective filing service like Legalzoom.

Most other cases benefit significantly from competent legal counsel. (19/x)
Finally, I'll leave you with this thought.

If you're reading this tweet, you're likely shopping for a business for which you're going to pay somewhere between $1M and $10M for.

With that in mind, ask yourself this: (20/x)
Is messing around with legal compliance and entity formation the best use of time to save $500 or $1,000?

It feels like a lot, but the cost of getting this wrong is orders of magnitude more than that.

I suspect your time is better served searching and finding a business. (/end)
That's a wrap!

If you enjoyed this thread:

1. Follow me @KHendersonCo for more of these
2. RT the tweet below to share this thread with your audience
If you like this tweet, you will love my exclusive emails for my subscribers that go into more depth on M&A tips, news, and education.

You can join here: khendersonco.beehiiv.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Henderson

Kevin Henderson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KHendersonCo

Dec 14, 2022
BREAKING NEWS:

The Lipson Bros., founders of @getdutchie, were ousted two weeks ago in what they're characterizing in a new lawsuit filed in DE as a "coup" staged by the Board.

There are some lessons in here for the SMB community. But first, some background.
@getdutchie was founded by the Lipsons in 2017 as Courier Plus Inc.

Since then, Dutchie has raised over $600M in VC financing, the latest round of $300M last fall at a $3.75B valuation.

To say Dutchie has been a wild success is an understatement.
In each VC round, anchor investors have joined the cap table. Casa Verde, Thrive, Howard Schultz, and more.

With each new anchor investor came more dilution for the Lipsons and more rights for the investors.
Read 17 tweets
Sep 29, 2022
Interested in building the next Berkshire Hathaway, but when you hear LLC, QSBS and pass-through tax, your eyes glaze over like a student listening to an econ lecture?

Yeah, me neither.

But still, lets break down the key considerations designing a structure. 🧵
Fair warning:

This is a really long thread, so grab a drink and get comfortable.

Then, we'll dig into the differences between LLC's, C Corps, and S Corps, and discuss some structuring strategies and how entity choice impacts whether or not they're available and how they work.
First Up - The LLC

An LLC is an entity that provides its members (owners) with limited liability for debts and obligations of the LLC, without incurring corporate taxes.

An LLC is a pass-through entity, meaning for tax purposes it's treated as if it doesn't exist.
Read 49 tweets
Apr 26, 2022
$TWTR filed its merger agreement with @elonmusk this afternoon after the market closed, so let's dig in and see what we can learn! 🧵
@elonmusk 1/ As is usually the case with public M&A, it's a reverse triangular merger. Twitter Inc. survives the merger as a private, wholly-owned subsidiary of X Holdings I, Inc. (subtle shout out to the Model X?). All-cash deal.
@elonmusk 2/ Deal is sure thing yet. Must go to special shareholder meeting, which is not a quick process. Not all SHs will approve the deal. Some will join class actions to try to extract more money. See this thread for more:
Read 21 tweets
Jan 22, 2022
M&A Transaction Highlight:

Let's take a closer look at a recent public M&A deal and see what we can learn. $MSFT and $ATVI

A new weekly thread. 🧵

*See disclaimers in pinned tweet.
1/ Structure. Reverse triangular merger. Common for PubCo M&A, very rare for SMB. Why? Stock deals require all stockholders to agree. Easy for SMB, not for PubCo. Mergers require less than all (dissenters get appraisal rights).
2/ You inherit liabilities in reverse merger, just like stock deals. $ATVI is managing investigations and suits re. sexual harassment and discrimination. $MSFT inherits that potential liability. Liabilities are a key structuring concern. Don't overlook!
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(