I'm honestly trying to figure out the latest spin on January 6--after more than 2 years of ignoring what the FBI knew, when they knew it, and the number of informants in key "militia" groups, corporate media now placing blame on law enforcement "failures?"
nbcnews.com/politics/congr…
nbcnews.com/politics/congr…
I noted several times re: Jan 6 committee work that it didn't appear investigators had interviewed Chris Wray or Steven D'Antuono, head of Washington Field office on Jan 6.
That turned out to be the case. There's no reason for this except as a cover-up:
amgreatness.com/2022/12/19/wha…
That turned out to be the case. There's no reason for this except as a cover-up:
amgreatness.com/2022/12/19/wha…
These agencies--FBI, Capitol Police, DC Metro, DHS for name a few--were not uninformed. They were not unprepared. They chose to leave the building, grounds intentionally unsecure while police lobbed concussion grenades into the crowd and other officers allowed protesters inside.
Again last week, a Capitol police officer testified at trial that she and her colleagues had no direction on January 6. She also testified the use of nonlethal munitions--which are lethal if misfired, she said--made the crowd "explode" that afternoon.
A recurring theme for J6.
A recurring theme for J6.
This creates a HUGE opportunity for House Republicans. Why did J6 committee bury this in an appendix? Why didn't investigators interview Wray or D'Antuono? If intel was available, let's see paper trial. Who made decision to keep Capitol vulnerable--and why?
And release the tapes
And release the tapes
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
