This is an excellent article by @nytimes@miwine on Friday afternoon’s development in Moore v. Harper.
Despite speculation, I do not expect the new (5-2 Republican) North Carolina Supreme Court to overrule that court’s (4-3 Democrat) February 2022 decision in Moore v. Harper that is currently pending on appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court.
On Friday, the N.C. Supreme Court did not grant rehearing of that decision; the time to seek rehearing of that decision had long expired.
Rather, it granted rehearing on what might be thought of as the “remedial” decision by the prior N.C. Supreme Court, which was decided shortly after the Moore v. Harper argument in the U.S. Supreme Court in December.
For a state supreme court to overrule one of its decisions while it is pending imminent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, would be an act of judicial and political hubris -- not to mention disrespect for the U.S. Supreme Court --
that I do not believe any state supreme court would do on the eve of the Supreme Court’s decision.
But even were the North Carolina Supreme Court to overrule its February 2022 decision — and do so before the U.S. Supreme Court decides Moore v. Harper — I do not believe that would render Moore v. Harper moot.
Among other reasons, once a case has been submitted and argued in the Supreme Court of the United States, there arises a cognizable judicial and public interest in the final decision of that case.
The New Yorker’s brilliant Editor and gifted writer, David Remnick, on January 6 and the January 6th Committee’s Final Report:
“Part of Trump’s dark achievement has been to bludgeon the political attention of the country into submission.
When a nation has been subjected to that degree of cynicism—what is politely called “divisiveness”—it can lose its ability to experience outrage. A republic is predicated on faith—not religious faith but a faith in the fundamental legitimacy of its political institutions
and the decisions they issue. To concede the legitimacy of statutes, rulings, and election returns is not necessarily to favor them. It’s simply to participate in the basic system that gives them form and force; citizens can, through democratic machinery, seek to defeat
The Electoral Count Act of 1887 was the principal law (in addition to the Constitution) that the former president and his allies exploited in their effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Electoral Count Act reform has always been essential if the country is to avoid another January 6 in 2024, or ever again.
With Congress' passage of that reform yesterday, the country will never again witness another January 6.
On January 6, 2021, the former president dared America, the Constitution and laws of the United States, and America’s Democracy, and he has continued to dare and taunt America, the Constitution, and America’s Democracy, since.
The January 6th Committee concluded, based upon the abundant evidence that it has developed over the past year and a half, that the former president committed criminal offenses against the United States and American Democracy on January 6.
Because of the fundamental integrity of the January 6th Committee’s investigation and the solemnity of its findings and recommendations, the Committee’s report and recommendations are entitled to great weight,
Congratulations to @AllisonJRiggs on her appointment by @NC_Governor to the North Carolina Court of Appeals today! Ms. Griggs is co-counsel for Common Cause in Moore v. Harper, now pending before the Supreme Court.
Ms. Riggs argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in Rucho v. League of Women Voters of North Carolina.
The following reasoning from the Chief Justice’s opinion for the Court in Rucho could well prove to be the critical reasoning that underlies the Court’s rejection of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper.
As @jamiegangel "reports," I signed up to beta test post.news, the new, @noam social media news platform. Noam is the adult in the room and understands the fiduciary responsibilities that come with running social media platforms like Twitter and Post News.
Noam promises around the clock news, responsible content, and civil conversation/debate like we used to have — and lots of fun. Noam was the longtime CEO of the “community driven” satellite traffic navigation company/app WAZE before WAZE was sold to Google for over $1B in 2013.
Thereafter, he was VP at Google for 7-8 years, where he grew WAZE into the global behemoth it is today, before departing Google in 2021.
I don’t think of the mid-term elections in the partisan political terms of whether the Democrats or the Republicans “won” or “lost.” I think of these midterm elections only in the “constitutional” terms of whether American Democracy won or lost.
For America’s democracy, these midterms were the most important elections in our Nation’s history. And the elections were indisputably a resounding victory for American democracy.
On November 8, the American People did what I observed in a series of Constitution Day speeches this fall they had the power to do: dispossess those politicians who have betrayed them, of the power that they had vested in, and entrusted with, those politicians.