Here’s a different picture of the Gol Mod 2 glass bowl, from “Encyclopaedia Xiongnu” (2013), edited by Tsagaan Törbat:
2/n
Gol Mod 2 is a large Xiongnu/Khünnü cemetery located just east of the Khanui River as it runs through Öndör-Ulaan county, Arkhangai province.
Locals first directed archaeologists to the site in 2001 (Allard et al., 2002).
3/n
Preliminary survey estimated 98 platform* tombs, 250 satellite burials, and 85 independent ring burials (Allard et al., 2002).
*“Platform burial” is one English term denoting the Хүннүгийн язгууртны булш: “Xiongnu aristocratic/noble grave[s]”...
4/n
…Archaeologists do not entirely agree on the main Xiongnu tomb typologies: ring vs. platform (terrace, monumental), or ‘commoner’ vs. ‘elite’/ ‘aristocratic’. See Ursula Brosseder’s seminal “Xiongnu Terrace Tombs and Their Interpretation as Elite Burials” (2009).
5/n
Confusingly, there are TWO famous Xiongnu cemeteries named Gol Mod – and both are in Arkhangai province! Locals also call Gol Mod 2 “Balgasyn Tal”; perhaps it’s not too late to use this name instead?
(Image modified from Honeychurch, 2015)
5/n
Gol Mod 2 (Balgasyn Tal) sits in relative proximity to two very famous Late Bronze Age sites in the Khanui Valley: the Urt Bulagyn khirigsüür complex (~15km to the NW) and the Jargalantyn Am deerstone and khirigsüür complex (~25km to its NW): facebook.com/photo/?fbid=74….
6/n
Further north along the Khanui River in Erdenemandal county, archaeologists identified Khar Khul Khaany Balgas, an urban complex likely occupied during the 13th and 14th centuries (Reichert et al., 2022).
7/n
Back to Gol Mod 2:
by 2013, Ch. Yerool-Erdene’s entry into ‘Encyclopaedia Xiongnu’ lists 452 burials at Gol Mod 2, 107 of which are monumental platform tombs, 81 are round burials with no surface features, and the remaining 264 as satellite ring burials (p. 99).
8/n
Of the monumental platform burials at Gol Mod 2, one has received particular attention: Tomb 1 and its 30 satellite ring burials.
According to Erdenebaatar et al. (2011) and Honeychurch (2015), Tomb 1 is one of the largest known Xiongnu platform burials in existence.
9/n
Mongol-American Khanui Valley Project excavated at Gol Mod 2 in 2002-2005.
However, the 30th (and largest) ring burial affiliated with Tomb 1 was excavated in 2006 by Ulaanbaatar State University.
Enter the blue glass bowl (Erdenebaatar et al., 2011; Törbat, 2013).
10/n
Although disturbed prior to excavations, the 30th burial yielded a trove of grave goods: lacquerware, a bronze basin, amber and blue glass beads, fragments of a Chinese bronze mirror, metal coffin decorations, and the ‘Roman’ blue glass bowl (Erdenebaatar et al., 2011).
11/n
As Jackmeister writes, Erdenebaatar’s 2012 English-language chapter on excavations at Gol Mod 2 attributes the glass bowl to “the 1st mound in the 28th burial” (p. 31). Dr. Diimajav Erdenebaatar was the Mongolian leader of archaeological excavations at Gol Mod 2.
12/n
However, Dr. Erdenebaatar & his colleagues attributed this glass bowl to “burial 30” in their 2011 conference volume. Also, both Honeychurch (Inner Asia and the Spatial Politics of Empire: 2015) & Encyclopaedia Xiongnu (2013) do the same.
13/n
What about the glass bowl? Is it Roman or not? Erdenebaatar et al. are confident in classing the blue glass bowl as Roman based on stylistic comparison to known Roman glassware (2011: 311). Ch. Yerööl-Erdene (Encyclopaedia Xiongnu, 2013) agrees.
14/n
Honeychurch displays a bit more skepticism:
“a glass bowl which, on the basis of its style and make, originated in the Mediterranean workshops of Rome...The glass bowl was found intact and has been identified as a Roman ribbed bowl (Zarte Rippenschale)...
15/n
"...In shape, size, and manufacture, it bears a strong resemblance to the blue and white ribbed bowl of the Roman Glass Collection at the Corning Museum of
Glass (Whitehouse 2001: 203). The museum piece dates between the early and mid-first millennium AD..."
16/n
"...which is consistent with current assessments of platform burial site chronology. However, researchers have yet to publish the results of compositional
analysis of the glass or provide absolute dating for the burial context itself" (Honeychurch, 2015: 281).
17/n
While the likely-Roman blue glass bowl is an important find from Gol Mod 2 (Balgasyn Tal), the site has taught us much more about the Xiongnu/Khünnü and their empire, even though hundreds of its tombs have yet to be excavated: montsame.mn/mn/read/298188
18/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dr. T. Iderkhangai (Ulaanbaatar University) led a team to conduct an archaeological survey in Gurvantes County, the westernmost county of Ömnögov’ Province.
Local authorities requested and funded their work in the Baysakh and Goyot districts (баг/bag) of Gurvantes.
2/n
In a recent interview, Dr. Iderkhangai discussed the four highlights from the survey:
1. Mongol imperial scenes 2. the Big Dipper constellation 3. Bronze Age petroglyphs only visible at high noon 4. a boat and leaping fish
“The enigmatic deer stones speckling the Mongolian steppe have long invited questions. Now fresh research is providing clues to why they were carved and what they may represent”: the-past.com/feature/conjur…
1/n
Deerstones can stand up to 4.8m tall, are generally granite, and were produced between 1300-700 BCE (Mongolia's Late Bronze Age).
These stele get their name from their "exaggerated, strikingly stylised maral (Cervus elaphus sibiricus, Siberian red deer)" engraved imagery.
2/n
In 1961, Soviet archaeologist V. Volkov created a tripartite deerstone typology still used today: Eurasian, classic Mongolian, and Sayan-Altai.
Mongolian archaeologist @ja_bayaraa J. Bayarsaikhan has proposed a 4th type: “mixed stylized and more realistic animal images”.
In 1972, archaeologists excavating two monumental burials at Aluchaideng (Ar Tsaidam/Ар Цайдам in Mongolian) in Inner Mongolia [Hanggin banner, Ikh Zuu aimag/Ordos prefecture] discovered this crown along with numerous other spectacular artifacts.
2/n
The Aluchaideng/Ar Tsaidam crown’s design is intricate and impressive. We can take a closer look thanks to these high-quality photos: updown.mn/196108.html
A recent article by Dr. Ruslan Muradov on highlights of the history and archaeology in Turkmenistan prompted me to look into how some of these sites bear witness to the Mongol conquest of Western and Central Asia (H/T @caa_network): voicesoncentralasia.org/between-the-ar…
A thread 🧵
1/n
Three city ruins discussed by Dr. Muradov were key sites in the expansion of the Mongol Empire: Nisa, Merv, and Urgench.
2/n
Nisa, Merv, and Urgench were major cities of medieval Western and Central Asia, one of the most vibrant, populous, and sophisticated regions of the world in that time. These cities would also become targets of Chinggis Khaan’s wider campaign against Khorazm.
Previously unrecorded images discovered and photographed at the multi-period Del Uul rock art complex in Mongolia – a thread 🧵
1/n
Del Uul is a famous petroglyph complex in the Middle Gobi (Dundgov’ Province). Although well known in Mongolia itself, the Del Uul complex has not received the international attention that it deserves.
With the announcement of newly discovered (September 2022) rock art at Del Uul in this FB post by Bicheechiin Batmönkh (Batmunkh), it’s a great time to spread the news in English: facebook.com/bat.batmunkh.1…
Earlier this year, a joint Mongol-Turkish research team led by Mongolian historian Dr. D. Ankhbayar discovered what they believe are the ruins of the summer palace of Hülegü (Хүлэг, Hüle’ü, Hulagu) Khan: eguur.mn/341309/
Further work at this site has yielded more evidence that this was a Mongol period construction in the form of ceramic fragments in the Mongol style: facebook.com/urugmnmedia/po…
3/n
The team has turned up both glazed and unglazed ceramics, including the roof tile end-pieces that mirror those found on Mongolian Buddhist temples like Erdene Zuu (zoom in on the last image to see what I mean): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdene_Zu…