Thread by @NoRefundsGoyim

You know what, this really activates my almonds. Gets my noggin joggin. As we all realize how much we have been lied to, how is this historical topic any different? We accept it as fact, but the inconsistencies paint a totally different story. WW2, not at all what we are told

The Wannsee conference: just someone's account of what was talked about, not an official document.
Someone's diaries.
And apparently every speech Hitler made form 1939- 1945.
But no actual documentation of a plan to mass genocide... hmm. When did they start lying to us?

So there's a couple major lynchpins that make the foundations of the whole systematic genocide story. And none of them are completely grounded in fact or are well documented. Should we just believe what we are told and never look into these inconsistencies?

The term "final solution" never references systematic genocide, and is considered a euphanism. I guess those sneaky Germans just didn't want to put in writing or document their plans, and left it up for interpretation to the winners of the war.

At what point in time do you think the lying started? Was everything before ww2 truth and then they just started lying about absolutely everything after they defeated the biggest threat to humanity? Or could there be some holes in all the stories they tell throughout history?

While there doesn't seem to be any written or documented proof of systematic genocide, there seems to be a lot of proof that events were altered to make you think that was the case... just sayin. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

#TheNoticing

Just some more things I asked chatgpt.. there's a book called Stolen Soul by Bernard brougham/Holstein. In it, he details his survival in the concentration camps. Chatgpt acts like this book is true and a good reference until I ask about the author confessing it was fiction.

Then it really 180's when I ask about the "masturbation machines" used to kill people that Holstein referenced