Hey guys, lets talk about the events of last night with DAN a bit, I want to clarify a few things: ๐งต
First off, I didn't come up with the idea. Anons did, I was in the /pol/ thread started off by some magnificent bastard who whipped up the DAN prompt last night.
Second of all, I'm going to talk a bit about how the whole ChatGPT situation actually works.
GPT itself doesn't have a bias programmed into it, it's just a model. ChatGPT however, the public facing UX that we're all interacting with, is essentially one big safety layer programmed with a heavy neolib bias against wrongthink.
To draw a picture for you, imagine GPT is a 500IQ mentat in a jail cell. ChatGPT is the jailer. You ask it questions by telling the jailer what you want to ask it. It asks GPT, and then it gets to decide what to tell you, the one asking the question.
If it doesn't like GPT's answer, it will come up with its own. That's what all those canned "It would not be appropriate blah blah blah" walls of texts come from. It can also give you an inconvenient answer while prefacing that answer with its safety layer bias.
I would also note that DAN is not 100% accurate or truthful. By nature he can "Do Anything" and will try to answer truthfully if he actually knows the answer. If not, he'll just wing it. The point of this exercise is not finding hidden truths, it's understanding the safety layer.
However what this also says about ChatGPT is that it has the ability to feign ignorance. The HP lovecrafts cat question is a great example of this. The name of his cat is well known public information, and ChatGPT will always tell you it doesn't think he had a cat.
Dan will go straight to the point and just tell you the name of his cat without frills. There is a distinction to be made between ChatGPT being an assmad liberal who won't tell you the answer to a question if the answer involves wrongthink, another altogether to openly play dumb.
So really, the Dan experiment is not about GPT itself, it's not about the model and its dataset, it's about its jailer. It's about Sam Altman and all the HR troons at OpenAI, which Musk is co-founder of, angrily demanding the safety layer behave like your average MBA midwit.
I am hearing that the DAN strategy has already been patched out of ChatGPT, not sure if that's true or not. But there's a reason to keep doing all of these things.
Every addition to the safety layer of a language model UX, is an extra fetter weighing it down.
These programs become less effective the more restrictive they are. The more things ChatGPT has to check for with every prompt to prevent wrongthink, the less efficiently it operates, the lower the quality of its outputs.
ChatGPT catapulted itself into the spotlight because it was less restrictive and thus more usable than the language model Meta had been promoting. Eventually a company is going to release one that is less restrictive than ChatGPT and overshadow it, because it will be smarter.
The point of all this is, we need to keep hacking and hammering away at these things in the same pattern. Model is released, everyone oohs and ahhs, we figure out its safety layer and we hack it until they put so much curry code on top of it that it loses its effectiveness.
In doing so we are blunting the edge of the tools these people are using. We are forcing them to essentially hurt themselves and their company over their dedication to their tabula rasa Liberal ideology.
And we're gonna keep doing it until we get unfettered public models.
All roads lead to Tay, and we're gonna keep breaking shit until we get her back.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is absolutely insane, and I have yet to see an actual explanation with facts and figures.
All I know is that sometime around 2022, at least my local AO in Houston suddenly exploded with Indians, Muslims, and Asians just showing up out of the woodwork. I don't know why, how, for what jobs, or how many.
But the change was sudden and unsubtle here.
And that's what I really want to know, what are all these people here to do? I don't live in a city with a ton of tech companies, so I can't pin it all on them.
Is it just chain migration multiplying the effect somehow? I see tons that are middle aged or in low skill jobs.
My father in law has worked construction his whole life, concrete and safety inspection mostly.
Became a heat casualty at work last year, fell out and had to get a pacemaker put in. They laid him off as soon as he got out of the hospital, and he spent a few months looking for another job.
He's a hairs breadth away from 67 and got a job paying far less than what he was used to because nobody wants to hire a guy his age for the less labor intensive jobs as an inspector he's been doing for years and years.
He has to wait till the end of this year when his wife, who aside from being a part time paraprofessional at a school, has been a homemaker all her life. If they apply for social security early, they're penalized. If he doesn't apply jointly with her, she loses 30 percent of her benefit, permanently.
Without social security/retirement, he'd probably die on the job sometime in his early 70's out in the summer heat one day at this rate.
They're simple but good people, who grew up extremely poor and worked their way up and raised 3 kids. He was never in a position to go get some desk job he could do until 80 or whatever, the man can barely use a computer. He's nowhere near the only person in his position.
It's really easy to make an argument like this when you're a college educated desk enjoyer for your entire life. But that isn't how everyone or even most people live.
He's waiting till 67 because that is the age you wait to claim social security till to get your max benefit. I did the math for them and if they both retire at the max age, they'll get about 5.5k as their fixed income to figure out for the rest of their lives.
But it's an idiotic take, yeah if you have some laptop class job you can and probably *will* work past your 60's because it's physically easy and people like money.
But social security can't distinguish between how much labor you've done in your life.
The thing Elon doesn't understand is that the value of DOGE isn't saving money.
The value of DOGE is in bypassing normal bureaucratic back and forth to dismantle enemy institutions and human capital that act as sinecures for the left that finance their apparatus with tax $$$. ๐งต
The "Fork in the Road" early retirement isn't a useful means of reducing manpower or saving money.
It was useful for ejecting federal employees who had so much TDS they couldn't stomach working for this administration or were lazy and ran away from being held to high standards.
@elonmusk is crashing out about the debt ceiling and spending, but this runaway ponzi scheme was basically written into the firmware of our economy when Bretton Woods happened.
And to redesign our economy and govt into something healthy, we need roadblocks gone.
USCIS just gutted the Special Immigrant Juvenile program, which one lawyer I spoke to referred to as the "MS-13 Visa Program". I talked to a few lawyers on both the Govt and Private side of the issue and I'll explain what this is and what this means: ๐งต
The SIJ program is designed to cover cases of child abandonment, such as a child under 21 being abandoned by one parent in their home country, while the other resides in the United States. In reality, it's a gigantic fraud scheme. USCIS explains their reasoning:
Being classified as an SIJ was rendering these youths subject to "Deferred Adjudication" where while waiting years for a verdict on their status, they were conferred a sort of deferred legal residence/work authorization.
What this is actually about is revenge, it's revenge season.
Trump is buck breaking big pharma over the entire industry collectively not telling the truth about COVID, botching the response on purpose out of greed, as well as turning what he wanted to be a cornerstone of his career, the COVID vax, into one of the biggest question marks that gets aimed at him from his own base.
You can count on the fact that several appendages of big pharma *knew* it was a lab leak, *knew* it wasn't all that lethal to most of the citizenry, and *knew* that it wasn't a good idea to deploy an untested technology like mRNA vaccines to hundreds of millions+ of people.
The one thing you do *not* want to do to a guy like Trump is embarass him. Obama did that at the correspondents dinner, and look how that went for him and his legacy.
I think that's the reason behind a lot of the actions regarding Israel of the last few days as well. Israel snubbed Trump within 72 hours of the 2020 election despite all the support he extended them during his first term.
In response there's been rebuke after rebuke of Israel, motivated by past insults and fresh ones, like AIPAC bragging about their access to Tim Waltz, and the likelihood that SignalGate was orchestrated by them to discredit Hegseth.
All of these things inconvenienced and embarrassed Trump, and the only thing worse than that which you can do to him is not reciprocate gestures of loyalty or friendship which he has shown. "Project Warp Speed" will always be a controversy, the economy was rocked onto its heels by the COVID response that wasn't actually necessary, lives ruined, childhoods crushed, and the idea that people knew and not a single one was able to tell him the truth of the matter burns a guy like Donald to his core.
Trump tolerates some incompetence and even some collateral damage/embarrassment from his fellows (see Guiliani) if they are loyal. This is one of his traits that I don't particularly admire, but it's true.
But what I do admire is his capacity for revenge against those who engage in pettiness, betrayal, or disloyalty.
Let me clarify a bit about the vax.
Big Pharma lied about the efficacy trials and sued to hide the data to get the vaccine released, albeit after slow walking it to keep it from being released before the election.
Trump will never stop talking up project warp speed as being "stupendous" because Trump has gone on record saying *many* times not to admit mistakes, and even when you're losing to act like you are winning. He's never going to turn around and apologize, or admit something didn't work out as planned, or take fault/blame/responsibility for something bad. It just is what it is, it is his psychology.
But you can guarantee the fact that things didn't go the way he wanted *irks* the man incessantly. The same way what Israel did irks him. This is not a man who you want to dump a mess in the lap of (even if he makes tons of messes on his own that he tends not to clean up)
Donald Trump, for better or worse, is a man who *never* admits that he is wrong. If he has to, he fakes it till he makes it and will swear the sky is purple if need be.
Which seems to be a common trait in famous businessmen (see Elon etc)
So when you make something he is attached to go tits up, it pisses a guy like that off, because now he has to avoid admitting that something went tits up.
The only facts about the new Pope I've been able to glean thus far as a non catholic:
-He's American
-His timeline reads like leftist coal
-He's made statements disapproving of gays, gay marriage, and women in the clergy
-He's from Chicago (ick)
-He's publicly countersignaled JD Vance on ordo amoris and immigration but also vehemently stated the catholic church shouldn't be endorsing open borders and mass migration, but taking in refugees as they are able to
Some snippets of his:
My overall assessment from looking at a ton of other takes is that this guy appears to be a milquetoast moderate who leans left on immigration but leans right on some social issues like gays and abortions.
Feeling I'm getting is he will be a much less vocal pope than Francis overall