As promised, here is a thread about the history of the "and girlfriend" trope. If you're new to this conversation, we're talking about the arrest this week of Atomwaffen leader Brandon Russell "and girlfriend" Sarah Clendaniel. WaPo has since updated to call her his partner (1)
To review, Clendaniel was pictured wearing Atomwaffen-style paramilitary uniform, gear, and mask; expressed her own white power ideology; and expressed her readiness to sacrifice her own life "for my people" (white people) (2)
This is clearly not "and girlfriend," but rather is a white power activist (meaning someone prepared to take action for their beliefs). It may be that she is also a domestic terrorist. (3)
"And girlfriend" comes from a long, long issue in journalism, movies, and the academy, in which women aren't recognized as political actors when their beliefs don't align with a feminist mode (4)
(Read @MicNick11's masterful book, Mothers of Conservatism, on this) (5)
In other words, when women say "I'm just a wife and mother," or "I'm not political," we have usually taken them at their word--even when, in the case of white power women, they were in fact activists as they said these things. (6)
They have done everything from writing movement ideological treatises, to publishing their own magazines, to driving getaway cars (7)
(On this, read Kathleen Blee's Women of the Klan and Inside Organized Racism and @seywarddarby Sisters in Hate and Jessie Daniels new book) (8)
W/o recognizing antifeminist forms of women's activism, we missed a whole bunch of things. Consider a key activist described in one book as "the young wife" of a movement leader (even as she's doing incredibly important work for the movement in portraying herself as a martyr) (9)
Or another who was in the room when a key declaration of war was written. Did you read it, they asked her in court? "I proofread it for them." Any historian of women wants to know what that means, because it could be commas, but it could be writing the declaration (10)
Perhaps most importantly, if we exclude women as activists, we miss huge chunks of mobilization. How do we know that the paramilitary white power movement of the 1980s flowed into the militias of the 1990s? Women's publications. (11)
So when you see "and girlfriend," or a flat/dumb/shrill rendering of a person that doesn't try to understand them as a person with a worldview and an ideology, please do notice and speak up about it. It's important (12)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The point here is that fascism is on full display, openly: no dog whistles, no plausible deniability. It's a show of power and an another attempt to make this look and feel normal.
And it will not just magically disappear after the election, regardless of the outcome.
In fact, it might be worth thinking through the very likely possibility that this kind of display suggests that this candidate and this movement don't care that much about the outcome.
Today, Rep Thomas Massie visited Waco and talked about it as his "wake-up call". Many responded that they had been awakened by Ruby Ridge. Thread on both: (1)
At Ruby Ridge (1992), what happened is this: a family with ties to the white power movement/Aryan Nations had encamped at a remote cabin in Idaho. Parents, kids, and an adopted teenager holed up. The father, Randy Weaver, was persuaded to modify a weapon by a federal informant (2
...and this modification made it a 1/4 inch too short (illegal). Entrapment? Yes. Was Weaver sent the wrong court date? Yes. But also he never planned to submit to the court. He and his wife Vicki (also an avowed antigovernment writer) prepared for siege (3).
There were panics about refugees eating rats in the 1980s. These were quickly followed by hate crimes against refugees, spearheaded by white power activists but employing local communities incited by that rhetoric. (1)
You can in fact trace such rhetoric about refugees and immigrants through the 20th c, with measurable violence every time. (2)
So let's not get confused: the debunked claims that refugees are eating cats aren't just nonsense. They are the beginning of a wave of violence. The people spreading this rhetoric either know exactly what they're doing, or they should know. But violence follows. Every time. (3)
Lots of news these days, so ICYMI: Three white power activists, two of whom are former Marines, sentenced for a plot to attack the power grid (1)nytimes.com/2024/07/28/us/…
This is a story that shows a long and continuous history of white power movement activity that runs all the way back to the 1970s, and has included infrastructure attacks like this one alongside mass-casualty attacks like OKC bombing in 1995 (2)
This movement brought together Klansmen, neo-Nazis, militamen, skinheads, radical tax resisters, followers of Christian Identity and more--a diverse movement in every way but race (3)
A thread of other things that have involved tents, assembly, and sound amplification at Northwestern and on Deering Meadow @thedailynu. Here is an action demanding the safe return of hostages taken by Hamas on Oct 7
Regarding the argument that a peaceful demonstration restricts campus access: a couple of weeks ago, an anti-gay, anti-feminist, antiabortion and ultraconservative group picketed Northwestern's campus. They had a very bad bagpipe player and a bunch of banners. (1)
Gay students, trans students, women students all had to walk past these dudes and their bagpipe to get to class. They were not removed, even though they were first, disrupting class and more with the stupid bagpipe and (2)
Holding signs that directly smeared and attacked members of protected groups. That is not a Title IX violation. That's part of free speech. (3)