One day after OGR proved that #mattydickpics is a liar who "censored" information about Trump's efforts to suppress speech, Elise and Turley are treating #mattydickpics as a factual mouthpiece.
BREAKING: Elise says that tech companies should no longer be reimbursed for legal process.
Remember that there are lawyers involved with Twitter Files whose role has not been disclosed. Are we sure Turley is not involved personally?
Turley is now complaining that the FBI is enforcing laws designed to protect the right to vote.
Liz Cheney's replacement ALSO doesn't want private companies to be paid for legal process.
Mike Johnson is speaking in favor of parents attacking school board members now.
BREAKING: @danielsgoldman catches Jim Jordan doing what he accused Adam Schiff of.
Linda Sanchez has a good purple hair thing going on.
Gets Elliott Williams to say that witnesses should have some actual knowledge of the things they complain about.
What's up with Matt Gaetz's nose?
Now the Deep State Committee is quoting Project Veritas, thanks to Matt Gaetz.
Meanwhile Raiklin loves this.
Jordan says that Gaetz' time expired, Gaetz is ignoring him, and now asking follow-up questions.
Thomas Baker claims there was unmasking abuse. Which is nutty bc a Trump US Attorney reviewed it, said it didn't happen.
Oh. Silly me. Jordan is just going to let Gaetz go on.
DWS quotes Jordan saying that Benghazi worked to attack Hillary.
DWS gets Turley to confess he has no unique or special knowledge of Twitter.
Now Issa is trying to resuscitate Turley after he confessed to having no knowledge.
Chris Stewart wants to call Jim Comey which is pretty cool bc we can ask about how he weaponized the FBI against Hillary Clinton.
Stewart said there was zero evidence against Carter Page, which is nutty bc the DOJ IG report he claims to be basing this on laid out a bunch of evidence.
Now Jordan’s fbi witness is trying to avoid saying that Jan6 was an act of terrorism.
Dan Bishop must think that Donald Trumps’s efforts to censor Twitter must be the worst in history bc that’s what the evidence shows.
Dan Bishop now taking a pro-Klan stance, opposing the protection of voting rights.
Dan Bishop is now arguing that the NSA shouldn’t have the total Twitter feed but the Saudis should. Why does Dan Bishop like Saudi Arabia more than the US?
For those asking who them woman sitting behind Williams, that’s Nicole Reddit, spouse of Guy Reffiitt, whose son was threatened by dad.
Sorry Nicole Reffitt.
Kelly Armstrong claims that DOJ was just bigfooting local prosecutions of people who assault school board members.
He’s the first Republican to make good, bipartisan points, abt third party data.
Turley revealing #MattyDickPics duped him into opposing the protection of voting rights.
Someone should have asked Turley abt CRT censorship.
Jordan now asking why the FBI would protect the right to vote.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nice to start cataloging the people, like @MaryMargOlohan, who are stupid enough to take @SecRubio's false claims about what the EU fine is for seriously.
Thanks for making that clear!
Big Dick Toilet Salesman says he is stupid or a liar.
Unsurprising that Medicare fraudster @SenRickScott thinks fines for fraudulent consumer claims are censorship.
To add the confusion of the many ways Lindsey the Insurance Lawyer bolloxed her attempt to indict Jim Comey, there are actually THREE different documents.
First, what she purports is an indictment (but which was not presented to GJ in this form). Sig page looks like this.
The sig page for the doc originally docketed as the no-bill indictment looks like this (identical to what I just posted). Basically, Lindsey put the sig page from the purported indictment on the no-billed one.
Sometime later that day, someone FIXED that (the no-billed indictment) with a correct last page.
Let me try to explain how John Durham made you MAGAts all look like dumbasses.
By context, this email of 2 Russian spies talking about starting a Deep State conspiracy is July 26.
But this Russian spy report--the one you're all drooling over? Durham has, AFAIK, ALWAYS hidden the date of that. Always. 🤔 @ChuckGrassley is probably colluding with him to do so now.
But BY CONTENT, it can only have been written July 26 or later.
@ChuckGrassley Now, Durham concluded that the Bernardo emails were "compilations," which is a dodge word for "fabrication." But even if you believe the Bernardo emails are REAL, the one via which the Russian spies would have "learned" that Hillary "approved" a smear campaign was date July 27.
In a declaration filed this week, Trump's top DOGE at Treasury cited a GAO report from last year. Lots of people On Here are taking that $2.7T out of context. (And ignoring that poor Tom miscited some quotes in this paragraph, but we expect shoddy work from DOGE.)
But let's look at the GAO Report he relies on, shall we?
FIRST humiliating thing DOGE Tom didn't tell anyone is that MANY of these improper payments--the reason there was a recent spike--pertain to Trump's own COVID programs.