Kamil Galeev Profile picture
Feb 10 14 tweets 4 min read
FYI: When you see Russian elite members "acting mad", be aware they are acting 100% rationally. It's smart to play mad. Mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive, you can:

a) Play the "voice of reason" -> Putin destroys you
b) Play "mad" -> Putin keeps you
c) Keep silence🧵
You won't get why Medvedev is "acting so deranged" without taking into account the consequences of not acting deranged

"Nazi drug addicts"
"Pigs"
"We'll retaliate using weapons of any kind"

This is not a signal to you. It is a signal to Putin:

"I am not a danger. Leave me be"
Same with Lavrov's "Jewish Hitler" remarks. I think it is very smart and well thought behaviour. He is purposefully playing "antisemitic" to maximise the damage to his personal reputation in the West. The worse, the better. Non-terrible standing in the West = liability in Moscow
Why? Well, because plenty of influential interest groups in Moscow do *not* want the war. They bleed daily from it, economically and otherwise. They need deescalation, otherwise some of them will get completely destroyed. Many people with resources need deescalation ASAP
They could not pressure Putin though (that would be dumb). What they could hypothetically do is to try negotiating a deal with the West over the Putin's head. For that however, you need someone:

1. From the upper elite
2. With strong foreign connections
3. Acceptable reputation
Further argument will be based upon the following assumptions:

A. Putin is not dumb
B. Those around him are not dumb either

In this case:

1. Putin understand the danger
2. Those around him understand that he understands it. So they are destroying their reputations preventively
"Jewish Hitler", "pigs", "I'll nuke y'all" is conscious reputitional self-damage. You cut off your option to negotiate with the West over the Putin's head -> signal loyalty. You will be spared. The more self-damage you do, the safer Putin feels with you -> you with him
Notice which Russian functionary works on inflicting repetitional self-damage harder than anyone else? Dmitry Medvedev. Why? Because he is the former President -> an obvious candidate for any dissatisfied faction

So he's chosing a reputational suicide over a physical one. Smart
Same with Lavrov. As a Foreign Minister he has extensive Western connections and he could hypothetically try to use them. So he cuts off this option. Ideally, you need to outperform Putin, becoming even less acceptable candidature

Antisemitism is a good pick. Very smart
Someone with acceptable reputation is a liability. If he has strong connections and is from upper elite, he is a suicide candidature.

Someone with absolutely and totally unacceptable one is an asset though. He'd be conveying "Better Putin than monsters like Prigozhin message"
Let's review our options again:

a) Play the "voice of reason" -> Putin destroys you
b) Play "mad" -> Putin keeps you
c) Keep silence

Putin is explicitly or implicitly incentivising to take (b) and will destroy anyone who takes (a). So (c) is the most interesting group here
When reading the mood and the intentions of the Russian elite, ignore those who "play mad". They are not mad, and their actions are most likely motivated by the instinct of survival. They are making outrageous declarations, because they want to live. In fact they're scared
Do not look for the "voice of reason" either. Playing the voice of reason would amount to an open rebellion under the current conditions. It would be also a stupid way to rebel, announcing it out loud. Of course nobody is playing this game

Once again, they are not that dumb
Look for those who keep silence, or try to keep silence, performing only the basic minimum of ritual rhetorics. That is where the *actual* Russian opposition resides. If we frame the leading faction as the "Party of War", oppositional one would be the "Party of Plague"

The end🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

Feb 8
American discourse is "anthropological". Broadly speaking, you are classified according to how you look (White vs Black)

Russian discourse is "culturalist". Sharing the common cultural memes, having a Russian first name and speaking without accent pretty much makes you Russian
This is the first approximation of course. Both discourses are in practice idiosyncratic. In America very anthropological "White" and "Black" coexist with a 100% culturalist "Hispanic" category. Add to that a geographically defined "Asian" and you get a total idiosyncratic mess
On the other hand, culturalist Russia also has the racialised discourse which can be weaponised whenever deemed necessary for reasons that have nothing to do either with race or with culture. The most obvious example is - political disagreements. They are constantly racialised
Read 19 tweets
Feb 7
Even if an author cites his/her sources, it may be difficult to verify if he/she represented their content correctly, due to:

1. Sources being undigitized
2. Language/palaeography barrier
3. Sources simply being too difficult to understand *correctly*. E.g. much of Rosstat data
For example some Russian official statistics may not be necessarily "wrong". It's just that they are represented in a way that a layman is 100% guaranteed to misinterpret them, unless he/she conducts a special research on what does Rosstat mean exactly by this or that figure
Imagine you are trying to estimate Russian import dependency in light swords. The obvious solution would be to look up Rosstat data on

1. Import/Export
2. Domestic production

of light swords and compare them

It would be totally wrong though and will lead to absurd conclusions Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 5
Why did this story produce so much wow-effect? Well, because it portrays Taliban ex-fighters as humans with ordinary human problems relatable to a Westerner. Since we are used to reading absolutely dehumanizing narratives, the *slightest* humanizing perspective may be shocking
This is not so much about the Taliban as about the arbitrariness of story-telling. Humanization/dehumanization is an author’s choice. And whichever angle you choose, you can always find enough factual material to present you (arbitrary) perspective as the objective reality
Paradoxically, humanizing the absolutely dehumanized may be very easy. Choose their experiences that your audience can relate with, and discuss them in meticulous details:

“Wow, they’re almost like us!”

That’s conditional ofc. In this case conditional upon Taliban having won
Read 7 tweets
Feb 1
Many observers see Putin as an aberration, some unfortunate deviation from normality. I disagree. Watch this excerpt from Yeltsin - Jiang Zemin meeting in Beijing, December 1999. You can see:

- Nuclear blackmail
- "Multi-polar world" rhetorics
- Attempted alignment with China
Putin is not deviation from normality. He is just another stage of *return* to normality that started before him. Modern Russian regime was shaped to its current form around 1996-1997:

- Restoration of state security
- Re-militarization
- Crony oligarchy

Return to normality
In pretty much of its worst aspects the Putin's rule is only continuing the trends that had been set before and were very much visible by 1996-1997. Putin is just the logical continuation of late Yeltsin. Putin has been only perfecting the model casted long before his ascension
Read 5 tweets
Jan 30
Empire and colonies: an introduction

1. Russia imposes Communism in Czechia

2. Making it difficult to impossible to function without paying lip service to the Communist shibboleths

3. Now Russians are criticising Czechs for having paid the lip service to the said shibboleths
It’s *extremely* important. Colonies are always guilty, always tainted, always rightfully punished and disciplined by the empire. They never have a right to question the empire. If they resisted it, they’re guilty of resisting. If they complied, they’re guilty of compliance
Paradoxically enough, all the subjects being guilty, forever tainted by their past and having no right to raise the voice is *critically* important for the existence of the empire. It’s not based on everyone being “good”. It’s based on everyone being guilty -> having no rights
Read 4 tweets
Jan 29
Regarding @navalny's hate propaganda record, you can believe either:

a) an honest "this is all Russian propaganda" @UChicago Professor @k_sonin
b) your own shameless eyes

The choice is yours
Daily reminder that the current reputation of @navalny and his team results from the massive whitewashing by the a) Moscow b) Western media, who either failed to question him or chose not to. As a result, he got away with the most insane, easily verifiable lies. Like this one:
This is the cockroach video, existence of which @navalny denied. Based on these two videos you can:

a) see standard navalnist tactics when dealing with *any* criticism (denial, ad hominem, smear)
b) make your own judgement on integrity of Navalny and journalists whitewashing him
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(