A firepower Friday thread. 18th century buckshot: who used it? TL;DR-first reaction may be to associate this type of round with the American army, but most European militaries of the time used it, and the Russians stood out as the other military who employed it as standard. 1/17
I'll start by thanking Prof. Dr Hab. Grzegorz Podruczny for his advice with source material. His archeological work at Kunersdorf is one of the great scholarly projects in my field, and he was kind to show an annoying American PhD candidate around his site in 2018 and 2019. 2/17
Buckshot consists of smaller projectiles, which spread out after leaving the barrel of the weapon. it was utilized by American, Austrian, British, French and Russian regular troops as well. By firing more projectiles at the target, troops generated a larger wall of lead. 3/17
Most troops discussed in this post were not firing only buckshot, but rather both buckshot and musket ball ammunition. In English, this is called "buck and ball", (sometimes, "buck 'n' ball") ammunition.[1] This consisted of a regular ball with 2-3 buckshot attached. 4/17
This would provide the best of both worlds: the larger ball could be effective at long ranges, while at 100 yards or less, the buckshot would begin to wound and mangle enemy soldiers. In the French and Indian War British officers said that their enemies used this ammunition. 5/17
A British officer recalled, "The enemy never fire a single ball, for they always load with six or seven smaller ones (which are called buck-shot) besides their usual musket-ball." The same officer referred to being under buckshot fire as, "a dreadful shower." 6/17
By 1760, both the British and their provincial allies had followed suit. John Knox reported that New England provincials, "advanced, very spiritedly, to the enemy, who were endeavoring to steal upon them; gave them a regular discharge of a brace of balls, besides buckshot." 7/17
In his 2008 book, Kiril Tatarnikov shows the Russian military issued buckshot cartridges to soldiers as standard relatively early. In 1715, Russian troops were issued 50 cartridges total, 30 with ball ammunition, and 20 with buckshot ammunition. 8/17
The Russian army of the Seven Years' War used buckshot to terrible effect. Indeed, the use of buckshot may help explain the incredible high casualties at battles like Zorndorf. A Prussian recalled the battle of Zorndorf: 9/17
"On our side, therefore, there were...a great number of wounded. However, most of the wounded were able to convalesce with their regiments...every Russian infantryman loads a musket ball and...pack of buckshot. There are between 7-9 of these in a linen packet[.] 10/17
As a result of this, the Russians load quite slowly, as a Jäger loads his rifle. In the time it takes the Russians to load their weapons, the Prussians have fired three times. We have found signs of this buckshot in many of the wounded, because they bled...almost to death." 11/17
It is interesting that the Prussian soldier compares the additional time loading this ammunition to that of a Jägers' rifled weapon. After the Seven Years' War, Russian army would continue to use buckshot ammunition until the end of the Napoleonic Wars. 12/17
This ammunition was used by militiamen in the American War of Independence. When not using rifled weapons, militia troops increased their firepower through buck and ball ammunition. Both Continental and militia troops used buck and ball ammunition at the Battle of Camden. 13/17
George Washington was a proponent of buck and ball ammunition. On October 6th, 1777, Washington's general orders mandated, "Buckshot are to be put into all the cartridges that shall hereafter be made."[11] This decision came directly after the Battle of Germantown. 14/17
American sources report suffering buckshot wounds when engaged with British regulars, particularly in the Southern Campaign of 1781. At the Battle of Guilford Courthouse, it is possible that the Brigade of Guards and the 33rd Regiment were using this type of ammunition. 15/17
Rather than being a distinct practice unique to American backwoodsmen, many armies used this ammunition. The Continental army and the Russians stood out in employing it as their standard load. 16/17
For footnotes and more (the Austrians used it too, for example) check out the piece here: kabinettskriege.blogspot.com/2018/05/milita… 17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Alexander S. Burns

Dr. Alexander S. Burns Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KKriegeBlog

Feb 9
A thread on Black soldiers in 18th century European armies. Later this year, @ChevalierMovie is going to tell the story of French Chevalier de Saint-Georges. Black men fought (in small numbers) in most armies, we'll focus on the Russian, Prussian, British and Hessian forces. 1/25
I've been passionate about sharing this history for sometime, and presented at the @ConsortiumRev on this topic in 2022. The post does contain some offensive language in period quotations, I've replaced original language where possible. 2/25
Writing the history of enslaved people requires a great deal of care. I hope this thread respectfully explores some of the complexities of the service of these men, who both suffered a lack of freedom, and were able to use their service to improve their social status. 3/25
Read 26 tweets
Feb 8
A short Wednesday thread. Who doesn't love a grenade? You often hear that grenades fell out of use after the War of Spanish Succession, but is this true? Depends on the time and place, and the answer tells us a bit about 18th cent. Russian tactical doctrine. 1/12
Grenades continued to play an important part in siege warfare throughout this period, and both European and American officers concurred that armies needed to be supplied and equipped with grenades. 2/12
Evidence for the continued use of grenades by European armies is substantial. In 1747, two (probably drunk) Prussian cantonists disrupted a engagement party by exploding hand grenades nearby, until the minister had them chased off (no mean feat). 3/12
Read 12 tweets
Feb 7
Conventional wisdom asserts that 18th century soldiers didn't fight as skirmishers; that this was a Napoleonic development. How true is that? TL;DR, most 18th century armies utilized this practice in some form. Wargamers: please read. 1/24 Image
When thinking about skirmishers, those alive to a sense of the past often locate their development in the Napoleonic era, with the French tirailleurs, and their quick emulation by all of the states of Europe. 2/24
It appears that a form of skirmisher, often called "flanquers", "flanqueur," or sometimes "Blänkerer" by French and German speakers, or Flankers, by English speakers, developed during the eighteenth century. NOTE: these aren't troops deployed to the side of a formation. 3/24
Read 24 tweets
Feb 6
A short thread on 18th century desertion. How serious was desertion for armies in this period? TL;DR, They weren't all running off at the first loud bang. The British, Hessians and Prussians deserted less than we think, and the Continentals struggled a bit with this. 1/11
Any sort of exact average figure, when dealing with multiple armies, over the course of the 18th century, is difficult. By way of a rough estimate, perhaps 11% of soldiers deserted, though that figure was much smaller during peacetime, and potentially greater in wartime. 2/11
However, it may be possible to venture a more accurate guess when figures are separated by era and army. We will begin data from armies over long periods of time, and then move to figures connected with the Seven Years' War era, and move to the American War of Independence. 3/11
Read 12 tweets
Feb 5
The picture of brightly coated troops marching slowly to the beating of drums remains one of the most striking visual images of 18th century warfare. But did troops move at greater speeds on the battlefield? TL;DR, they often were flexible and ran if they needed too. 1/15
To students of the British Army in the American War of Independence, this should not come as surprising news. Matthew H. Spring has recently shown that British soldiers fought unconventionally in North America. However: this trend goes beyond North America and the AWI. 2/15
18th century soldiers were often rational actors, and made competent decisions based on the needs of the moment. This willingness to respond quickly was not a special feature of the British or Prussian armies, but common to almost all 18th century militaries. 3/15
Read 15 tweets
Feb 4
Be a historian they said. It will be fun they said. Turns out, they were right.
The feeling when you manage to beat the Prussians as the French Image
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(