Why is it that every time I see anything before 2019 involving the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Bat Lady & gain-of-function experiments w/ Sars-like Corona viruses, Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance & NIAID are named as funding the work?
There's this one:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
There's this one:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
And this one from 2015 with Ralph S. Baric which was AMENDED in 2015 to show that Wuhan's top Bat Corona-virus researchers, "Bat Lady" Shi Zhenli-Li, was specifically funded for HER work on THAT research by none other than USAID's PREDICT program via EcoHealth Allliance (Daszak).
Oddly enough, that 2015 study at UNC at Chapel Hill (Ralph Baric & Bat Lady) was yet corrected AGAIN in 2020 when they realized they had FAILED to upload the genetic sequence of their man-made gain-of-function SARS-like Corona Chimera to the Genetic Bank. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT3089…
Ralph Baric's (2016 UNC Chapel Hill) G.O.F. study. Bat Lady not an author but THANKS her for supplying them w/ "WIV1-CoV spike" plasmid & bat CoV sequences to infect "humanized mice" (mice w/ gen-altered lung tissue-more humanlike) with it.
NIAID funded. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26976607/
NIAID funded. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26976607/
2008 Bat Lady inserted human ACE2 binding molecules of SARS-CoV into a SARS-like bat coronavirus using an HIV-based pseudovirus system w/ cell lines expressing human ACE2 receptors-creating a chimera which "gained" ability to infect humans.
Lab-induced species jump.
Huh. Weird.
Lab-induced species jump.
Huh. Weird.
They should be REALLY careful doing all this gain-of-function research or, God forbid, they could literally CAUSE a pandemic through an accidental or intentional release of any of these lab-made chimeric sars-like bat corona viruses gen-edited to be super-infectious to humans.
In February 2020 I happened upon interview with Dr. Francis A. Boyle, drafter of the 1989 BioWeapon Treaty Act.
He found these studies & connected the dots. The virus is a super-Bioweapon.
In Dec 2020 he warned the mRNA vaccines were bioweapons too.
docs.google.com/document/d/19C…
He found these studies & connected the dots. The virus is a super-Bioweapon.
In Dec 2020 he warned the mRNA vaccines were bioweapons too.
docs.google.com/document/d/19C…
Well gosh it looks like Moderna submitted a patent for approval to start working on the Covid-19 vaccine super-early! Like, Spring of 2019-early.
Wait, what? And what's that amendment in Aug 2019, does that say what I think it says? "In case of deliberate release."
August 2019?
Wait, what? And what's that amendment in Aug 2019, does that say what I think it says? "In case of deliberate release."
August 2019?
By November 2021 the NIH had sued Moderna because they left the US government scientists off the vaccine patents. How did Moderna & NIH know the sequence to be able to submit a patent in Spring of 2019 if the virus supposedly came from the wild and was NOT developed in a lab?
WHY?
"4 Stages of Ideological Subversion".
Watch the first video, you'll see it is describing exactly what is going on right this moment on a global scale. "Demoralization" has occurred. That's why facts don't matter. We are in Destabilization right now.
bit.ly/TheirUltimateS…
"4 Stages of Ideological Subversion".
Watch the first video, you'll see it is describing exactly what is going on right this moment on a global scale. "Demoralization" has occurred. That's why facts don't matter. We are in Destabilization right now.
bit.ly/TheirUltimateS…
I believe many orchestrating "whatever all this is" WANT a globalized centralized technocratic world order either because they are ideologues or because of economic/scientific/academic hubris fueled by greed or ego. Take your pick.
Unless humanity wakes up, we're already slaves.
Unless humanity wakes up, we're already slaves.
And look who is also involved in Biolabs in Ukraine?
Oh yes. Hunter Biden. It's just all corrupt and all connected.
Oh yes. Hunter Biden. It's just all corrupt and all connected.
https://twitter.com/1stacyphillips/status/1625716377553342464?s=20
So within 44 days of the specific gene sequence being confirmed, Moderna supposedly flash-developed the mRNA-1273 vaccine, tested it (for 3-7 weeks) on mice, analyzed results & shipped a fully completed & tested clinical product out to begin human trials?
https://twitter.com/1stacyphillips/status/1416553204859346946?s=20
Ralph Baric "invented" the SARS-CoV2 MA for testing within that 41 day period too? May want to check the UNC Invention Report reference #18752 to see when he filed it. I'm just curious.
Don't tell me they didn't already have the sequence when the Patent was filed in March 2019.
Don't tell me they didn't already have the sequence when the Patent was filed in March 2019.
NIAID, NIH, Moderna, Vanderbilt, University of Texas, lots of scientists on here, including Ralph Baric.
So it took 25 days to receive the specific sequenced antigen, 15 days to test immunogenicity in mice, that's 40 days right there. But OK. Sure.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
So it took 25 days to receive the specific sequenced antigen, 15 days to test immunogenicity in mice, that's 40 days right there. But OK. Sure.
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
And notice the Chan/Zuckerberg Initiative sponsored the Moderna Vax development. Is this why Mark Zuckerberg censored all content that spoke of the vaccine dangers or natural immunity? Because he was invested in the development of the Moderna vaccine?
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
I'm still "Safe & Effective" today because MANY brave anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists spoke up & stayed loud.
Kudos from the bottom of my heart. I wish more people COULD have & WOULD have listened to you instead of "Trusting the Science".
#safeandeffective
#Pfizer
#Moderna
Kudos from the bottom of my heart. I wish more people COULD have & WOULD have listened to you instead of "Trusting the Science".
#safeandeffective
#Pfizer
#Moderna
FOIA Emails: Fauci WAS concerned re: NIH funding Ralph Baric's GOF research at Wuhan Lab. Baric shared reverse genetics techniques, mice engineered w/ humanized lungs & possibly a risky research proposal w/ W.I.V. senior scientist Zhengli Shi (Bat Lady).
childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/antho…
childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/antho…
@threadreaderapp unroll
Dr. David Martin Calls For Prosecutions: Fauci Knew Remdesivir Would Kill Thousands
rumble.com/v1a7gwj-dr.-da…
rumble.com/v1a7gwj-dr.-da…
@PeterDaszak @joerogan
Fauci, Gain-of-Function Research, and Wuhan Lab Funding via @YouTube
Fauci, Gain-of-Function Research, and Wuhan Lab Funding via @YouTube
Andrew, is this article from July 2021 accurate?
@PeterDaszak @AGHuff
July 2021:
Twenty-year genetic trail behind Covid’s creation
conservativewoman.co.uk/twenty-year-ge…
@PeterDaszak @AGHuff
July 2021:
Twenty-year genetic trail behind Covid’s creation
conservativewoman.co.uk/twenty-year-ge…
And is this video referenced by the above article accurate, Andrew?
@PeterDaszak @AGHuff
Dr. David E. Martin | Sitzung 60: Die Zeit ist kein flacher Kreis #Odysee via @OdyseeTeamodysee.com/@Corona-Aussch…
@PeterDaszak @AGHuff
Dr. David E. Martin | Sitzung 60: Die Zeit ist kein flacher Kreis #Odysee via @OdyseeTeamodysee.com/@Corona-Aussch…
@AGHuff
Here is a transcript of the David Martin/Reiner Fuellmich July 2021 interview:
drive.google.com/file/d/1U6utDC…
Here is a transcript of the David Martin/Reiner Fuellmich July 2021 interview:
drive.google.com/file/d/1U6utDC…
Dr. Boyle says the vax violated the Nuremberg code & the Bioweapons Antiterrorism act of 1989. Two years ago blew the whistle on Baric, Fauci, NIH & FDA.
If guilty, it's LIFE IN PRISON.
Law Professor Francis Boyle: The Vaccine is the real Covid-19 virus
rumble.com/vbng0o-law-pro…
If guilty, it's LIFE IN PRISON.
Law Professor Francis Boyle: The Vaccine is the real Covid-19 virus
rumble.com/vbng0o-law-pro…
You know what you did, @PeterDaszak
https://twitter.com/BrndnHairsniffr/status/1597465921026928640?s=20
FLASHBACK: July 24, 2020 article published in "Science", of Bat Lady "demanding" an apology from Trump (for saying the virus came from the Wuhan Lab).
The spin doctoring on the LIE that the Covid-19 virus came from the wild was elaborate and ran DEEP.
science.org/content/articl…
The spin doctoring on the LIE that the Covid-19 virus came from the wild was elaborate and ran DEEP.
science.org/content/articl…
What will blow people's minds even further is that the plandemic was ready to go in 2016 because Hillary was supposed to win. Trump's election delayed it by 3-4 years, as per Calin Georgescu, formerly of the UN Global Sustainable Index Institute, Geneva:
https://twitter.com/1stacyphillips/status/1694367846472749137
Who is Calin Georgescu? Former Executive Director of the UN Global Sustainable Index Institute in Geneva (2015-2016) & former President of Club of Rome-Europe. He'd know. The very people we conspiracy theorists have been pointing the finger at for 3 yrs.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1660351345415553027
What will blow people's minds even further is that the plandemic was ready to go in 2016 because Hillary was supposed to win. Trump's election delayed it by 3-4 years, as per Calin Georgescu, formerly of the UN Global Sustainable Index Institute, Geneva:
Calin Georgescu is the former Executive Director of the UN Global Sustainable Index Institute in Geneva (2015-2016) & former President of the Club of Rome, Europe. He would know.
I guess he grew a conscience when he decided to spill the beans.
I guess he grew a conscience when he decided to spill the beans.
DOCUMENTS: Chinese Researcher Who Mapped COVID Virus Two Weeks Before China Released Sequence Was on Anthony Fauci’s Payroll, by @DisInfoChron
A Chinese researcher who first submitted the genetic sequence for the SARS-CoV-2 virus in late December 2019, around two weeks before China disclosed the deadly virus to outside scientists, was on the payroll of Anthony Fauci’s institute at the time, according to a grant awarded to EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit operated by Peter Daszak. The disclosures call into further question what officials at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) knew about research they were funding in China where the pandemic began.
“The grant doesn't work on SARS-CoV-2,” Daszak told Nature Magazine, when the NIH was forced to review the grant in the summer of 2020. “Our organization has not actually published any data on SARS-CoV-2. We work on bat coronaviruses that are out there in the wild and trying to predict what the next one is. We don't work on sequencing SARS-CoV-2.”
Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, which first broke the story, several experts said the extra two weeks could have helped researchers better understand how COVID spread and develop therapies.
NIH officials refused to respond to multiple requests to explain how much salary they provided to Dr. Lili Ren, a scientist at the Beijing-based Institute of Pathogen Biology, who wrote a letter in support of Daszak’s grant application to Fauci’s NIH institute. Documents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released by a congressional committee show that Ren first uploaded the COVID virus sequence to the NIH’s GenBank on December 28, 2019—two weeks before scientists celebrated China’s release of the genetic sequence on January 11, 2020.
“The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has confirmed that Dr. Ren’s December 28, 2019, sequence was nearly identical to the sequence later made public by the China CDC on January 10, 2020, which at the time was the first known sequence,” said members of the House Energy & Commerce committee in a statement.
Anthony Fauci’s NIH institute awarded the grant in 2015 to Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, who partnered with Ren as a co-investigator on a multi-year project titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” The grant shows that taxpayers paid Ren a salary, although NIH redacted the amounts for salary and benefits.
Fauci’s NIH grant also paid for Ren’s expenses, including travel to the United States to meet with Daszak as well as her collaborator Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina.
As previously reported by The DisInformation Chronicle, Baric helped to ghostwrite a commentary titled, “No credible evidence supporting claims of the laboratory engineering of SARS-CoV-2“ that appeared in the journal Emerging Microbes & Infections. Published early in the pandemic, the commentary dismissed the possibility of a lab accident in China as a “conspiracy theory.”
“Sure, but don’t want to be cited in as having commented prior to submission,” Baric emailed the commentary’s listed authors, when asked to comment. After submitting several alterations to the text in track changes, Baric added, “I think the community needs to write these editorials and I thank you for your efforts.” Baric’s name does not appear as an author on the published commentary.
An HHS official wrote in a letter last month to the House committee that the sequence Ren sent to GenBank in December 2019 was never published. NIH later deleted it from the database, after Ren did not respond to NIH requests to provide more technical details.
The NIH then published a COVID sequence from another source on January, 12, 2020.
“The sequence published on Jan. 12, 2020, was nearly identical to the sequence that was submitted by Lili Ren,” HHS wrote to the House committee.open.substack.com/pub/disinforma…
A Chinese researcher who first submitted the genetic sequence for the SARS-CoV-2 virus in late December 2019, around two weeks before China disclosed the deadly virus to outside scientists, was on the payroll of Anthony Fauci’s institute at the time, according to a grant awarded to EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit operated by Peter Daszak. The disclosures call into further question what officials at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) knew about research they were funding in China where the pandemic began.
“The grant doesn't work on SARS-CoV-2,” Daszak told Nature Magazine, when the NIH was forced to review the grant in the summer of 2020. “Our organization has not actually published any data on SARS-CoV-2. We work on bat coronaviruses that are out there in the wild and trying to predict what the next one is. We don't work on sequencing SARS-CoV-2.”
Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, which first broke the story, several experts said the extra two weeks could have helped researchers better understand how COVID spread and develop therapies.
NIH officials refused to respond to multiple requests to explain how much salary they provided to Dr. Lili Ren, a scientist at the Beijing-based Institute of Pathogen Biology, who wrote a letter in support of Daszak’s grant application to Fauci’s NIH institute. Documents from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released by a congressional committee show that Ren first uploaded the COVID virus sequence to the NIH’s GenBank on December 28, 2019—two weeks before scientists celebrated China’s release of the genetic sequence on January 11, 2020.
“The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has confirmed that Dr. Ren’s December 28, 2019, sequence was nearly identical to the sequence later made public by the China CDC on January 10, 2020, which at the time was the first known sequence,” said members of the House Energy & Commerce committee in a statement.
Anthony Fauci’s NIH institute awarded the grant in 2015 to Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, who partnered with Ren as a co-investigator on a multi-year project titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.” The grant shows that taxpayers paid Ren a salary, although NIH redacted the amounts for salary and benefits.
Fauci’s NIH grant also paid for Ren’s expenses, including travel to the United States to meet with Daszak as well as her collaborator Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina.
As previously reported by The DisInformation Chronicle, Baric helped to ghostwrite a commentary titled, “No credible evidence supporting claims of the laboratory engineering of SARS-CoV-2“ that appeared in the journal Emerging Microbes & Infections. Published early in the pandemic, the commentary dismissed the possibility of a lab accident in China as a “conspiracy theory.”
“Sure, but don’t want to be cited in as having commented prior to submission,” Baric emailed the commentary’s listed authors, when asked to comment. After submitting several alterations to the text in track changes, Baric added, “I think the community needs to write these editorials and I thank you for your efforts.” Baric’s name does not appear as an author on the published commentary.
An HHS official wrote in a letter last month to the House committee that the sequence Ren sent to GenBank in December 2019 was never published. NIH later deleted it from the database, after Ren did not respond to NIH requests to provide more technical details.
The NIH then published a COVID sequence from another source on January, 12, 2020.
“The sequence published on Jan. 12, 2020, was nearly identical to the sequence that was submitted by Lili Ren,” HHS wrote to the House committee.open.substack.com/pub/disinforma…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
