@CJR Part Three, on how Gerth rellied heavily on a Russian intelligence product that even John Ratcliffe warned against -- without telling readers he was doing so.
@CJR Part Four, on how Gerth recycled the errors of other "Russiagate" propagandists -- including Sidney Powell -- rather than the actual record of the Russian investigation.
@CJR When CJR is publishing tripe that adopts a lower standard of factuality and disclosure than John Ratcliffe -- and instead adopts the Sidney Powell standard of truth -- @jelani9 and other administrators ought to take note.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
From this weekend: I finished my 4-part series showing all the ways Jeff Gerth's series at @CJR said more about his journalistic failures than it did others.
Part One showed he couldn't make it through his first sentence w/o an error.
@CJR@nytimes@washingtonpost Part Three: In his series, Gerth complains that journos aren't transparent enough. But he didn't disclose he was relying on Russian intelligence product that even John Ratcliffe warned was unreliable.
Then NYT (in the article that says Jack Smith just hired JP Cooney to conduct the financial investigation he has been overseeing for 14 months) stated that Smith has been asking witnesses about what it portrays as that research.
.@nataliewsj didn't think it newsworthy to mention that the single thing @JamesComer showed with his Twitter hearing is that the ONLY entity who attempted to censor Twitter was Donald Trump (and that Matt Taibbi had "censored" that fact).
@nataliewsj@JamesComer How is it that James Comer had a hearing and proved himself badly, embarrassingly wrong, and people are still doing puff pieces about what a reasonable person he is?
He proved himself wrong. That's your headline.
@nataliewsj@JamesComer BREAKING: James Comey proved that Donald Trump is the only one censoring Twitter!!!
I've decided to start a thread of all the times journalists make stupid comments claiming that a prosecutor is "ramping up" or taking "new aggressive steps."
Imagine if, instead of lying to your readers, you instead told them, "investigations work step by step. We see some of those steps, we don't see other parts. Oh, and Trump's lawyers are still lying to us about their perception of what the steps have been.
They specifically state he did NOT meet with Biggs and Nordean on Jan 5 -- this is partly so they can't call him and ask if he knew about the conspiracy, but also bc we're still trying to figure out who WAS in that meeting.
DOJ wants 2 years of prison for Jesse Benton, former Paul staffer who lied to cover up a Russian donation to Trump in 2016. One issue is whether Benton's PRIOR campaign finance conviction, for which Trump pardoned him, counts for criminal history.