John Farrell ☀️🌬🔋 Profile picture
Feb 13, 2023 19 tweets 4 min read Read on X
American electricity customers are likely overpaying #monopoly electric utilities by $2 to $20 billion per year, says a white paper from UC Berkeley's Energy Institute at HAAS: google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j… Image
Regulators charged with protecting the public interest have systematically failed to align the actual risk and reward of utility capital investments, allowing utilities to earn too much money on very low risk investments. Result: "a sizeable transfer from consumers to investors"
Here's a few highlights: "it is noteworthy that over recent years, utilities have earned sizeable regulated rates of return on their capital assets, particularly when set against the unprecedented low interest rate environment post-2008"
"A consistent trend of excess rates of return...regulators seem to follow some ad-hoc approaches that make them reluctant to set [return on equity] RoE below a nominal 10%"
For those not immersed in utility "rate of return" jargon, here's a quick primer: "with an installed capital base [power plants and power lines, etc.] worth $10 billion and a rate of return of 8%, the utility is allowed to collect $800 million per year from customers"
So, the higher the rate, the more money a utility collects. And collect they have! A few reasons why:
"Regulators face an information asymmetry with the utilities they regulate when determining whether costs are prudent and necessary" In other words, regulators are outgunned.
"Utilities have a clear incentive to request rate increases when their costs go up, but do not have much incentive to request a rate decrease when their costs go down" Duh, utility CEOs are rational.
An important note in the battle for local solar? "Excess regulated returns on equity will distort the incentives for utilities to invest in capital" (e.g. owning stuff themselves instead of supporting customer-owned stuff)
Other things considered and dismissed on the evidence: utility credit ratings (stable), debt/equity ratios (same), market risk premium (actually lower).
Also left out? Utilities that haven't had rate cases recently @SimonMahan So over-earners that don't face regulators regularly aren't even in this analysis!
And guess what? Part of your overpayment to a monopoly utility is likely due to your regulators' fascination with round numbers! Image
The authors provide a range of potential overpayment, from $2 to $20 million, but it's worth noting that the low end is based on an assumption about utility capital costs that, if viewed historically, would suggest utilities did earn enough to cover costs in the 1980s and 90s.
As the authors note, "This seems implausible given the large capital expenditures the industry has continued to engage in over the last four decades"
Here's a great closer: "it is striking that other countries are able to attract sufficient investment in their gas and electric utilities while guaranteeing lower regulated returns than are available in the US context" Translation: "suckers!"
This isn't a paper addressed to regular folks, but it has MAJOR implications for utility bills. If you do clean energy and climate policy work, it matters, especially when newspapers write this about clean energy laws:
Residential customers use about one-third of US electricity. At the midpoint estimate of $10 bil. in excess costs, it means each electric customer is overcharged by about $75 per year just to pad utility shareholder pockets.
#Monopoly power is costly to consumers, which is why we need to give folks better options to manage their bills (like solar!) when their regulators fail.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Farrell ☀️🌬🔋

John Farrell ☀️🌬🔋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @johnffarrell

Mar 7
Does rooftop solar actually help the climate? Yes. –– A response to the Shift Key podcast discussion between @JesseJenkins and @emilypont that gets a lot wrong about #RooftopSolar. THREAD. #SolarEnergy @robinsonmeyer
1. Rooftop and community solar have comparable costs to utility-scale solar. Jenkins’s argument is based (in part) on a common misunderstanding caused by trying to compare the generation costs of these resources. ilsr.org/investor-owned…
Rooftop solar costs less than you think. It’s not about the cost per watt (although I agree with Jesse that costs need to come down in the U.S.). The cost of rooftop solar to electric customers is set by policy, e.g. net metering, minus the often-ignored non-monetary benefits.
Read 22 tweets
Feb 9
After what I’ve learned in the past year, here’s my pitch: we’re going about finding new grid capacity for clean energy and electrification all wrong. A thread. (And one caveat) #transmission #cleanenergy Guy sitting at a table with a sign that reads "we don't need new transmission -- change my mind"
The switch flipped when listening to the @drvolts Volts podcast with @JasonTSConduct1 and Emilia Chojkiewicz. The current approach to high-voltage #transmission capacity is like building broadband with new copper wires and 56K modems. volts.wtf/p/one-easy-way…
The mind-blowing fact? Emilia’s disclosure that most U.S. decarbonization grid models assumed the only method of transmission expansion was building new lines, not using any of the available tech to expand capacity. Crazy!
Read 17 tweets
Nov 29, 2023
ILSR has found that community solar and utility-scale solar have comparable costs to #Minnesota electric customers. So what's happening here? 🧵 #SolarEnergy
1) Xcel Energy hates the community solar program because it directly competes with utility-owned power generation that generates profits for shareholders. ilsr.org/why-does-one-m…
Image
2) Xcel employs numerous lobbyists on your dime (along with its for-profit pals, a total of 105 registered lobbyists in the state!) who work full-time trying to obfuscate the costs and benefits of community solar, to protect Xcel's market share. startribune.com/utility-lobbyi…
Read 9 tweets
Nov 3, 2023
How do we maximize clean energy benefits, including wealth building, jobs, and lowering costs? Local, local, and local ownership, baby! 🧵 Image
If you want more money for folks who have local solar, give them ownership of the system! >> Greater lifetime savings and wealth >> This applies to community solar, as well! ilsr.org/report-advanta…
Image
Do you like clean energy jobs? Per $1 million spent, Xcel Energy told the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission it would create 30 times more jobs to put solar on rooftops than build utility-scale solar. And locally owned projects can prioritize hiring community members! Image
Read 10 tweets
Oct 31, 2023
Minneapolis passes its Climate Legacy Initiative, juicing its local climate action funding by $10 million per year. A short thread on how other cities can similarly advance clean energy: #cities #ClimateAction #CleanEnergy @theUSDNstartribune.com/minneapolis-hi…
The revenue for Minneapolis comes from a utility franchise fee, basically a pass through from electric and gas bills to the city government. In about 40 states, cities can similarly negotiate and set these fees: ilsr.org/energy/utility…
This podcast, with former Minneapolis city council member Cam Gordon, explains how the city used the franchise fee the first time, an idea borne out of exploring whether to form a public utility: ilsr.org/minneapolis-ce…
Read 9 tweets
Jun 12, 2023
A few thoughts on "permitting reform" from an avowed local renewable energy advocate: 🧵
My understanding of "reform" is that several components are actually "preemption" of local decision making (based on how every article mentions multi-jurisdiction permitting), but I've not made a study of it.
Also, I'm a local-first renewable energy advocate, but I'll concede that it seems very unlikely we'll get to our clean grid goals fast enough without transmission, so I start with the presumption that more transmission is necessary.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(