American electricity customers are likely overpaying #monopoly electric utilities by $2 to $20 billion per year, says a white paper from UC Berkeley's Energy Institute at HAAS: google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j…
Regulators charged with protecting the public interest have systematically failed to align the actual risk and reward of utility capital investments, allowing utilities to earn too much money on very low risk investments. Result: "a sizeable transfer from consumers to investors"
Here's a few highlights: "it is noteworthy that over recent years, utilities have earned sizeable regulated rates of return on their capital assets, particularly when set against the unprecedented low interest rate environment post-2008"
"A consistent trend of excess rates of return...regulators seem to follow some ad-hoc approaches that make them reluctant to set [return on equity] RoE below a nominal 10%"
For those not immersed in utility "rate of return" jargon, here's a quick primer: "with an installed capital base [power plants and power lines, etc.] worth $10 billion and a rate of return of 8%, the utility is allowed to collect $800 million per year from customers"
So, the higher the rate, the more money a utility collects. And collect they have! A few reasons why:
"Regulators face an information asymmetry with the utilities they regulate when determining whether costs are prudent and necessary" In other words, regulators are outgunned.
"Utilities have a clear incentive to request rate increases when their costs go up, but do not have much incentive to request a rate decrease when their costs go down" Duh, utility CEOs are rational.
An important note in the battle for local solar? "Excess regulated returns on equity will distort the incentives for utilities to invest in capital" (e.g. owning stuff themselves instead of supporting customer-owned stuff)
Other things considered and dismissed on the evidence: utility credit ratings (stable), debt/equity ratios (same), market risk premium (actually lower).
Also left out? Utilities that haven't had rate cases recently @SimonMahan So over-earners that don't face regulators regularly aren't even in this analysis!
And guess what? Part of your overpayment to a monopoly utility is likely due to your regulators' fascination with round numbers!
The authors provide a range of potential overpayment, from $2 to $20 million, but it's worth noting that the low end is based on an assumption about utility capital costs that, if viewed historically, would suggest utilities did earn enough to cover costs in the 1980s and 90s.
As the authors note, "This seems implausible given the large capital expenditures the industry has continued to engage in over the last four decades"
Here's a great closer: "it is striking that other countries are able to attract sufficient investment in their gas and electric utilities while guaranteeing lower regulated returns than are available in the US context" Translation: "suckers!"
This isn't a paper addressed to regular folks, but it has MAJOR implications for utility bills. If you do clean energy and climate policy work, it matters, especially when newspapers write this about clean energy laws:
Residential customers use about one-third of US electricity. At the midpoint estimate of $10 bil. in excess costs, it means each electric customer is overcharged by about $75 per year just to pad utility shareholder pockets.
#Monopoly power is costly to consumers, which is why we need to give folks better options to manage their bills (like solar!) when their regulators fail.
As @apple releases software to let their Airpods Pro mimic hearing aids, I hope they see the opportunity to completely disrupt the hearing aid market just as they did cell phones. A 🧵 from someone whose wife uses aids. #HearingAids
Current hearing aid tech is sufficient. For several thousand dollars, you get a device that is relatively unobtrusive, has decent battery life, and you can get professional support tuning it.
But for a wireless device with bluetooth that sits in your ears all day, today's hearing aids are like flip phones to the iPhone. The microphones are terrible. I always have to ask my wife to switch to her phone mic in order to have a conversation.
I have a few thoughts about this fascinating choice by three news outlets not to publish leaked emails from the Trump campaign, with its implications for journalism, anti-competitive behavior, and democracy. 🧵
What @AP flags is, of course, the big difference between publishing Hillary's emails in 2016 and refusing to publish Trump's in 2024. At the very least, news organizations should be extremely clear on why they're making this choice.
Was 2016 a lapse in journalistic ethics about publishing what was newsworthy? Are these three news outlets now behaving more ethically? How do we know?
Does rooftop solar actually help the climate? Yes. –– A response to the Shift Key podcast discussion between @JesseJenkins and @emilypont that gets a lot wrong about #RooftopSolar. THREAD. #SolarEnergy @robinsonmeyer
1. Rooftop and community solar have comparable costs to utility-scale solar. Jenkins’s argument is based (in part) on a common misunderstanding caused by trying to compare the generation costs of these resources. ilsr.org/investor-owned…
Rooftop solar costs less than you think. It’s not about the cost per watt (although I agree with Jesse that costs need to come down in the U.S.). The cost of rooftop solar to electric customers is set by policy, e.g. net metering, minus the often-ignored non-monetary benefits.
After what I’ve learned in the past year, here’s my pitch: we’re going about finding new grid capacity for clean energy and electrification all wrong. A thread. (And one caveat) #transmission #cleanenergy
The switch flipped when listening to the @drvolts Volts podcast with @JasonTSConduct1 and Emilia Chojkiewicz. The current approach to high-voltage #transmission capacity is like building broadband with new copper wires and 56K modems. volts.wtf/p/one-easy-way…
The mind-blowing fact? Emilia’s disclosure that most U.S. decarbonization grid models assumed the only method of transmission expansion was building new lines, not using any of the available tech to expand capacity. Crazy!
ILSR has found that community solar and utility-scale solar have comparable costs to #Minnesota electric customers. So what's happening here? 🧵 #SolarEnergy
1) Xcel Energy hates the community solar program because it directly competes with utility-owned power generation that generates profits for shareholders. ilsr.org/why-does-one-m…
2) Xcel employs numerous lobbyists on your dime (along with its for-profit pals, a total of 105 registered lobbyists in the state!) who work full-time trying to obfuscate the costs and benefits of community solar, to protect Xcel's market share. startribune.com/utility-lobbyi…
How do we maximize clean energy benefits, including wealth building, jobs, and lowering costs? Local, local, and local ownership, baby! 🧵
If you want more money for folks who have local solar, give them ownership of the system! >> Greater lifetime savings and wealth >> This applies to community solar, as well! ilsr.org/report-advanta…
Do you like clean energy jobs? Per $1 million spent, Xcel Energy told the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission it would create 30 times more jobs to put solar on rooftops than build utility-scale solar. And locally owned projects can prioritize hiring community members!