This will become potentially relevant. Just an FYI;)
Raise you hand if you know the intermediate host of #Marburg.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Fynnderella1

Feb 13
"Plasma concentrations of sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sPD-L2 were significantly increased in patients with IgG4-RD, and the expression of PD-1 and PD-L2 on Treg cells was upregulated.

academic.oup.com/rheumatology/a…
“PD-1–PD-L1 can promote the differentiation of naïve T cells into Treg cells and thus participate in the pathogenesis of IgG4-RD."academic.oup.com/rheumatology/a…
With so many boosted - IgG4 disease wave should be next?
Read 4 tweets
Feb 3
To all of The Experts™ who shouted me down in 2020 when I said:
-No way will the LNPs remain at injection site
-No way mRNA and Spike will not persist
-Risk of blood brain barrier penetration is too high for platform
And finally,
-Spike will enter nucleus of cells…..
There are many reasons why the platform itself is a non-starter. Let’s just start with the delivery lipids:
“We observed pronounced changes in both clot morphology and kinetics of fibrin clotting in the presence of artificial liposomes.”

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31655206/
Not meant for human use or repeat use! Highly inflammatory n and of themselves.
What are we in, Vax 5 or 6?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 31
1) Masking was a non-starter! To the argument “Why do Drs. use them in surgery?” It’s just to keep particulate out of wound field- nothing else!
▪Ritter et al., in 1975, found that “the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room
2) environmental contamination.”
▪Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. “Particle contamination of the wound
3) was demonstrated in all experiments.”
▪Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. “No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,” they wrote.
Read 29 tweets
Jan 30
1)Let’s talk about bug protein shall we? 🧵#EatZeeBugs

I’m finding insect proteins creeping their way into our snack foods in the US without the consumer knowing. Why is this important? Insect proteins contain a highly allergenic polysaccharide called Chitin. Image
2) Much like shellfish allergies, chitin allergies are an anaphylaxis risk. Not reading labels of food stuffs containing insect protein can prove to be a huge problem. Even if not allergic, it can induce lung inflammation. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33640239/
3) in addition to inflammation, when you block one of the major therapeutics that treat inflammation, that could be disastrous. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33640239/
Read 10 tweets
Jan 28
Making claims that are easily disproven are means to paint all that question, with the same brush, easily discrediting us. We choose to stick to the provable science and not glom on to fantasy- the truth is bad enough!
@drcole12 @TheJikky @Jikkyleaks @RWMaloneMD @richardursomd
Rather than go after those that made, mandated, and took over our world, she chooses to try to discredit @drcole12 and @RWMaloneMD who are accurate, and lost everything to be ethical. This is why none of us will ever associate with them.
Boom? Really? 🤣
This person 100% gets it.
Is this their goal? Well, we won’t have it.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 22
1)Important tweet for those following.
I just saw a HUGE COINCIDENCE 🔥🔥

The SARS-CoV-2 Spike and a hypothetical BACTERIA protein sequenced in 2023 are the SAME 🔥🔥🔥 #
If I say SAME, it is the same.

It only lacks the beginning, the end and... the RRAR ‼️‼️
2) from January 8, 2023????

Oh, this nonsense was not expected hahaha. Who swallows this TRAP???

I'm freaking out!! RIP SARS-CoV-2 NATURAL

Apparently on January 8, 2023 they have published the sequence of a hypothetical protein from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa
3) we (which can be found in other species) and it turns out that ESA is EXACTLY THE SAME as the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (without RRAR ‼️ haha)

Someone explain this to me because this "level" escapes me. How is it possible that the protein sequence of a hypothetical bacterium is
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(