โข Thad McFadden con 76% de sus tiros desde el triple y 37.6% acierto
โข Travis Trice con el 51% de sus tiros, 35.2% de acierto
โข David Jelinek con el 64% de sus tiros, 25.4% de acierto
โข Artem Pustovyi con 9% de rebotes ofensivos - 22% defensivos
โข Nemanja Radovic con 12% de rebotes of. โ 16% def.
โข Jordan Sakho con 12% de rebotes of. โ 20% def.
โข Thad McFadden 27.5% de uso y 0.99 pts/posesiรณn finalizada
โข Nemanja Radovic 20.8% de uso y 1.04 pts/posesiรณn finalizada
โข Travis Trice 25.9% de uso y 0.93 pts/posesiรณn finalizada
โฌ๏ธ๐งต
๐ธ UCAM Murcia, ACB
Siguiente anรกlisis: Bร squet Girona
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Atamanโs three-guard concept isnโt new.
During his last season at Anadolu Efes, he flirted with a similar lineup (Larkin-Micic-Beaubois), but it only accounted for 5% of total minutes.
Fast forward to Panathinaikos:
Last season: 13% of minutes with Sloukas, Nunn, and Grant.
This season: 37% of minutes across various three-guard combinations.
Itโs no longer an experiment; itโs their identity.
๐๐งต (2/12)
2-Why the Shift?
Atamanโs philosophy is clear:
๐ก More creators = Unpredictable offense
๐ก Faster pace = Exploit defensive mismatches
In a game against Fenerbahce, he even tested a four-guard lineup.
While it only lasted a few minutes, it showcased his commitment to pushing the boundaries of positional basketball.
But does this philosophy deliver consistent results?