๐๐ ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ธ๐
40.3% de sus pts (8ยบ)
39.7% de TC intentados (10ยบ)
33.4% acierto (10ยบ)
๐๐ผ๐ท๐ ๐ด๐๐บ๐ธ
14.7% de sus pts (3ยบ)
20.0% de TC intent. (3ยบ)
36.4% acierto (6ยบ)
๐๐๐๐ด
45.0% de pts (13ยบ)
40.4% de TC intent. (10ยบ)
54.9% acierto (16ยบ)
โฌ๏ธ๐งต
๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
โข Ludde Hakanson: 18% de sus tiros desde la zona, 75.8% de acierto
โข Emir Sulejmanovic: 52% de sus tiros desde la zona, 67.3% de acierto
โข Michale Kyser: 66% de sus tiros desde la zona, 61.1% de acierto
โข Adam Smith con 45% de sus tiros desde el triple y 40.0% acierto
โข Ludde Hakanson con el 44% de sus tiros, 38.3% de acierto
โข Denzel Andersson con el 77% de sus tiros, 28.1% de acierto
โข Jeff Withey con 15% de rebotes ofensivos - 27% defensivos
โข Emir Sulejmanovic con 11% de rebotes of. โ 21% def.
โข Michale Kyser con 9% de rebotes of. โ 13% def.
โข Adam Terrell 25.1% de uso y 0.96 pts/posesiรณn finalizada
โข Ludde Hakanson 23.9% de uso y 1.00 pts/posesiรณn finalizada
โข Jeff Withey 23.1% de uso y 0.93 pts/posesiรณn finalizada
โฌ๏ธ๐งต
๐ธ Surne Bilbao Basket, ACB
Siguiente anรกlisis: Monbus Obradoiro
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
๐๐งตBuilt to Win, Still Searching: Inside Panathinaikosโ Lineup Dilemma What the Numbers Reveal About Panathinaikosโ Unfinished Puzzle
Panathinaikos entered the season aiming to build a European dynasty. TJ Shorts, Kendrick Nunn, Sloukas, Holmes - on paper, the most offensively gifted roster in the EuroLeague.
But basketball isnโt played on paper. With Lessort sidelined and roles still fluid, the data reveals a team caught between identities: explosive yet unstable, deep yet imbalanced. To understand why, we need to dig deeper. ๐
Through Round 24, Panathinaikos ranks 8th in both Offensive (117.8) and Defensive Rating (114.1), with a +3.7 Net Rating.
โข eFG%: 54.3% (12th)
โข OREB%: 32.5% (9th)
โข TOV%: 14.7% (strong)
Defensively, they limit FTs (2nd-best) but struggle on the glass (15th). Solid, but not dominant. ๐
The 3-Guard System Revisited
Atamanโs love for three-guard lineups continues. Sloukas, Nunn, Shorts (plus Grant) give PAO elite creation and shot-making.
Offensively, the logic works. Defensively, itโs fragile. Shorts and Sloukas are frequent targets, raising questions about balance โ and whether talent density is creating structural tension. โ๏ธ
โ๏ธCrafting a Contender: Olympiacos' Offensive Evolution ๐ดโช๏ธ
A New Era for Olympiacos Under Coach Bartzokas. In his second tenure, Bartzokas has transformed the team into a consistent contender with a distinct playing style. Motion Offense + tough Defense has led to 3 Final Four appearances in 4 seasons!
We're breaking down how Coach Bartzokas has revolutionized Olympiacos basketball!
Follow this thread for an analysis on their system, star players, and championship chances! ๐
1๏ธโฃ ๐ง Bartzokas' System: A Distinct Identity.
His philosophy shapes player selection and tactical approach. Offensively, they run a Motion Offense with continuous movement, sharp cuts, and fluid passing.
They lead the EuroLeague in Assisted FG% (69%), Assists per 100 possessions (24.7), and AST/TO ratio (1.8).
2๏ธโฃ ๐ Finding the Key Pieces
Bartzokas' keen eye for talent has been crucial. Building around Papanikolaou and Vezenkov, they've added invaluable role players like Walkup, Fall, McKissic, Peters, and Milutinov.
The collective performance has been nothing short of impressive.
Atamanโs three-guard concept isnโt new.
During his last season at Anadolu Efes, he flirted with a similar lineup (Larkin-Micic-Beaubois), but it only accounted for 5% of total minutes.
Fast forward to Panathinaikos:
Last season: 13% of minutes with Sloukas, Nunn, and Grant.
This season: 37% of minutes across various three-guard combinations.
Itโs no longer an experiment; itโs their identity.
๐๐งต (2/12)
2-Why the Shift?
Atamanโs philosophy is clear:
๐ก More creators = Unpredictable offense
๐ก Faster pace = Exploit defensive mismatches
In a game against Fenerbahce, he even tested a four-guard lineup.
While it only lasted a few minutes, it showcased his commitment to pushing the boundaries of positional basketball.
But does this philosophy deliver consistent results?