🧵of 🧵
We've covered most of the commonly used sutures...now it's time for Nylon.
Most of us associate Nylon with skin closure, and that is what it's used for most of the time, but there are a few other uses.
As usual, we'll go over its properties, and so on. (1/ )
This is from a 1942 Annals of Surgery article.
Nylon was first made in 1938 by Dupont as a substitute for silk. Since surgeons already liked to use silk sutures, it immediately occurred to them to try to use Nylon sutures as well.
Nylon suture is monofilament and glides through tissue easily, making it useful for skin closure.
It's also nonabsorbable, meaning that it will have to be cut out, or else the skin will eventually grow over it. It's rarely used internally, as normally there are better options.
Other advantages of Nylon are that it's strong and tissue reactivity is mild.
The biggest disadvantage is that the knots are among the most difficult to tie of all suture materials.
This is especially the case with larger nylon sutures, like 0 or 2-0.
I usually tie 5-6 knots, often using a slip knot or surgeon's knot at the beginning.
Tails are cut about this long, at least for larger nylon sutures (this is 2-0 Nylon). With smaller sutures (like 5-0 for example), the tails can be shorter.
When the Nylon suture tails are left too long (L picture), they often get in the way when doing the next suture (R picture).
Either the knot will be compromised, or you have to spend time tediously fishing the annoying string out of there (and probably also trimming it).
Nylon sutures are rather stiff and it is easy to leave 'air knots' when tying.
Here you can see that I have tied knots that seemed fine at the time, but now that it’s finished you can see there are several air knots.
These look bad and are more likely to become undone.
It's tempting to compensate for this by just pulling the sutures tighter, and in doing so it often happens that they get pulled too tight.
Here, I have eliminated of the air knots, but now the sutures are pulling too hard on the tissue. At the least, it will leave an ugly mark.
When closing skin with nylon, there is also a tremendous tendency for the first throw to spring apart due to the tension from the tissues, as I am trying to simulate here.
There are various ways to overcome this, but this would probably need to be its own separate thread.
The largest size Nylon is #2.
I use it to close skin of the chest or abdomen in trauma patients who have died intraoperatively.
There are reports of using it to close rectus fascia in urologic procedures. I don't recommend using nonabsorbable suture for fascial closure.
#1 Nylon exists, and was once used to close fascia, which cannot be endorsed now.
#1 or 0 Nylon has been used to ‘whip stitch’ the abdominal skin closed after damage control laparotomy (as described by Dissanaike). Note that the fascia itself remains open.
Nylon sizes 2-0 through 6-0 are almost always used to close skin of different thicknesses.
2-0 might be used on the thick skin of the back or thigh. 3-0 is good for skin in many areas. 5-0 or 6-0 might be used for the face and for closing skin on small children.
Looking through all the Nylon sutures on the rack, one notices that almost all of them are on cutting needles. This is consistent with its usual role in skin closure.
You only start seeing taper point needles once you get down into ophthalmology range (8-0 and smaller).
Nylon also tends to come on rather large needles. It's hard to fully appreciate in the photo, but this is a pretty big needle for a 3-0 suture.
The large needles have the advantage that it's easier to close skin by 'taking' both edges with a single bite.
Here is an 8-0 Nylon on one of the smallest needles, next to a standard size needle holder (which you wouldn't use) for reference.
8-0 Nylon is used in ophthalmologic procedures, and I also found references describing its use in peripheral nerve surgery and for vasovasostomy.
Nylon goes all the way down to 9-0, 10-0 and 11-0.
It's easier to manufacture at these sizes than many other sutures, so that's part of the reason why it features in microsurgery.
Uses that I can find include eye surgery, vasovasostomy, and peripheral nerve surgery.
It is worth noting that the black color of Nylon sutures can make them hard to find when removing them if they are buried in dark hair, such as in a scalp laceration.
In these cases it may be better to use Prolene, which is blue, and is much easier to find and remove.
Finally, there is also a braided version of nylon called Nurulon. As you might expect, it's *much* easier to tie.
4-0 Nurulon has been used to close dura in brain and spine cases, and to close neck muscle layers during C-spine surgery.
⬛️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A simple but effective tool for cutting bone. As usual, we'll go over its design, how to use it, and why such a basic device still exists in the surgical toolbox in 2026.
We'll also cover its history and the tragic fate of Leonardo Gigli. (1/ )
The main advantage of the Gigli saw is that it's simple. It's just a wire and 2 hooks.
It doesn't require any power or any other equipment and it can be used in austere environments. If you needed to, you could amputate a leg out in the wilderness with a Gigli saw.
The technique is simple. The saw blade is dragged back and forth to cut the bone. It helps if you keep the momentum going and try to minimize 'stopping'.
Also, try to use most of the length of the blade instead of just the middle part, or this part will overheat and break.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I found commentary from a 1967 edition of Look magazine that sounds...familiar.
First: junior doctor dissatisfaction and low pay, and UK physicians leaving for elsewhere: (1/ )
It has always been the case that though much of the conversation has to do with pay, that the true causes of discontent are more complex than that. Again, this was noted more than 50 years ago:
It was noted at the time (once again: 1967) that the practice of having doctors in training move around every few months was a problem. Which I'm gathering, remains an issue.
Temporary shunts for vascular trauma have actually been around for >100 yr. The first widespread use likely began with Prof. Tuffier in France, who used them in wounded soldiers in WW1 (1914-18).
The strategy was different though... (1/ )
Formal vascular repair had been described by Carrel, but was impractical in war conditions due to practically all wounds having massive contamination and delayed presentation, which made the vessels more friable and difficult to suture.
Bernheim had a famous quote on this:
Transport times were much longer then, and most of the wounded who were going to die by exsanguination had already done that.
So instead, the main problem of vascular injury at the time was probably thrombosis of the injured vessel with ischemia of the distal tissues.
🧵regarding the technique of 2-handed knot tying.
It's July again, so it's a good time to revisit this 🧵.
2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is worth learning. We'll start with just the basic steps. Advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally *don't* want to start off with uncrossed threads (L picture).
Instead, it's better to cross the two threads first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the threads, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of threads, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L strand can be on top, or the R stand can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.