Dig into almost any school book ban in FL, and you find 1 person--or a small group-- filing objections to books en masse, demanding removals. The restrictions on books this vocal minority have gotten are astonishing, precisely b/c they're often enacted without any process /2
Ofc, parents should be able to engage with schools about books & curricula. But schools also have to balance the demands of a few people with the objectives of public education, and the interests of ALL parents. Too often, that isn't happening. /3
These aren't one-off concerns of parents for their specific kids either. These lone book banners usually lead organizations that want public schools to match their ideogical worldview. Mostly, it's not about any specific book; it's about control, censorship, and erasure. /4
Clay County: @JuddLegum reported that 1 person, who leads the FL chapter of 'No Left Turn in Education' wants to ban 3,600 titles. The district pulls books when challenged & now over 200 books have been pulled: Some permanently; some may prove temporary /5 popular.info/p/how-to-ban-3…
In Escambia, 1 teacher has challenged over 100 books. The district puts most books in backrooms when challenged, and students need permission from parents to see them. All before seemingly anyone vets the challenges for reasonableness or accuracy? /6 northescambia.com/2022/11/challe…
Last year a handful of ppl got 156 books pulled from shelves for a few months in Indian River. Another group got 16 books pulled in Polk. Most (not all) of these bans ended up being temporary. But for a few months, students couldn't read them, even if parents wanted them to. /7
To reiterate: most of this is happening before serious review of the books takes place or any other stakeholders have input. How is that fair? Rather than trust teachers or librarians, the bounds around literature in schools are being set by an ideologically-motivated minority /8
Why? How? A lot of this is treading on a mix of fear, hate, misinformation. Book banners have flooded schools with claims that LGBTQ+ characters make a book “sexual,” and that books with any sexual content make a book “pornographic” or “obscene.” /9
The book banners also frequently claim that books that even touch on racism can be harmful and require restriction. Even when a book contains accurate facts or historical observations quoted verbatim, they seek bans /10
Now: new education laws threaten to supercharge these trends. FL media specialists have been instructed to "err on the side of caution" when reviewing books, and parents are being given new powers to challenge any & every book they don't like /11 pen.org/florida-book-b…
Even 1 wrong book on the shelf can get a FL teacher in trouble, threaten their professional teaching license or possibly result in a felony. The conditions for greater censorship are ripe. How can teachers & schools stand against these self-appointed censors in this context? /12
This is where we are with book bans, shifting from a single parent's or citizen's ire, to laws that directly pressure districts to remove books 📚 with the threat of government enforcement. All largely to appease this vocal minority. /13
And if you think parents ALL want these restrictions, think again.
When districts have invited parents to restrict students' library access, a tiny % have done so. In Clay, only 3 of over 30,000 students were opted into these restrictions in the fall /14
Schools across FL are under pressure to privilege the ideological preferences of a select few, over the rights of all. That’s a sad prospect for the future of public education... and it’s a devastating indictment of the state of our democracy. /15 aol.com/now-only-takes…
And all signs point to this trend spreading. FL is just one of the states with new laws on the books, or being considered, that make book banning easier & empower these lone banners further. And the suspension of books at the behest of 1 person is happening in many places. /16
Concerned about this? Want to stay informed? Sign up for our education censorship newsletter. Support our work @PENamerica. Go to a school board meeting. Bring a friend. #FreeTheBookspen.org/issue/educatio…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Oh wow. The Wharton Board of Advisors @Penn has proposed a resolution to punish any student or faculty member that uses hate speech or celebrates murder or genocide. The proposed resolution is vague, and threatens to ban wide swaths of speech. /1 axios.com/2023/12/08/pen…
I understand the impulse. Universities must take hate seriously. But this proposal would be unenforceable & likely backfire against what it aims to achieve.
This is the risk in a fraught political moment -- that institutions overreact and adopt policies that chill speech /2
Not hard to contemplate a range of scenarios that would confound and complicate enforcement.
- Could educating about abortion be categorized as advocating for murder by critics?
- How would an admin determine when a word is “veiled” hate speech vs just political provocation? /3
I wish we saw this more often. The president of Princeton has responded with a resounding defense of academic freedom, after a Congressman called for the University to intervene in a prof's choice of reading materials for a course. 👇 /1 president.princeton.edu/blogs/response…
This is the latest chapter in a dust-up that began in Aug over calls to ban the book 'The Right to Maim' from a course syllabus for being allegedly anti-Semitic. Even Israel's minister of diaspora affairs wrote Princeton about it. The Univ has steadfastly supported the prof. /2
The letter from Princeton president Eisgruber provides a clear summary of how academic freedom works, how books get selected for courses. And it emphasizes that at universities-- "controversies must be addressed through deliberation and debate, not administrative fiat." Yes. /3
Among the latest crop of supposedly controversial books that need banning in Florida...
One person has filed over 700 book challenges in Clay County, Fl, succeeding in getting all kinds of books temporarily & permanently banned. This is the first time I've seen 'Arthur' on one of these lists. @Scholastic
Of course, this comes as FL schools are suspending access to Shakespeare, or being called on to ban the Bible urgently. So, was it only a matter of time 'til they came for Arthur??
The same banner wants to remove 'It' by @StephenKing and Sophie's Choice, among others.
Just to be clear: the Miami Dade district that claims @TheAmandaGorman's The Hill We Climb hasn't been banned & is accessible to all students... has also clarified (when you read the fine print) that students must pass a reading test to read it. /1 washingtonpost.com/education/2023…
Librarians will tell you: this is an impediment to students' voluntary inquiry. The decision to place it on a middle school shelf isn't just for guidance as to age-related content. It is to bar students from freely picking it up. This makes the lack of a clear basis for ... /2
that decision all the more problematic. This was not the decision of librarians/educators who put the book in the school as a primary source in the first place. This was a reaction to an outlandish complaint, in the midst of extreme pressure to restrict books about racism /3
Yikes. A year after Central York school district in PA was at the center of a book ban crusade, here it is again, making questionable choices.
As they did last year, students are protesting ongoing book bans in the district-- now they feel intimidated /1 yorkdispatch.com/story/news/edu…
On Friday, during school hours, five students were called into a mtg with the superintendent & district leaders where they were "harangued" and spoken to "sternly"... for what?
Apparently for speaking publicly about the district and the bans. /2
What did the students do? Apparently they were reprimanded for talking to the press earlier last week -- for expressing frustration with the district's book bans, and making plans to protest.
Still watching what's going on @ NEW COLLEGE of Florida? Next board meeting is today at 2pm. What will DeSantis allies installed atop the college do next? Faculty & students unsure what will come for tenure, academic courses.
There's numerous threads to watch 👀 🧵
2. Among other issues... trustees today will vote on tenure for 5 faculty who have already been approved by every academic body. Interim president Corcoran has directed them to deny or defer-- an unusual directive that hints at political motives tampabay.com/news/education…
3. These faculty were previously directed to drop out of applying for tenure, with the threat that they'd be denied if they didn't. This is all clearly undermining the integrity of academic freedom, perhaps as is intended. Our full statement @PENamerica pen.org/press-release/…