the Discourse on whether it is better to mourn Brianna Ghey with #SayHerName or #HerNameIsBrianna was an unproductive failure.
The level of attention was *wildly* out of proportion with [1] the small but real level of harm and [2] the ability to fix that harm.
A thread: 1/🧵
Level of attention: Absurdly high. 2/🧵
I estimate that prominent tweets on the Discourse have now gotten about ~50 million views in total (!!)
For example, the 4 threads (9 tweets) below have gotten >19 million views:
Attention has an opportunity cost. The most attention-grabbing, viral posts on this discourse are just low-substance drama. 3/🧵
They don't funnel Random Twitter Discourse attention back into understanding Black, trans, or other oppressions -- or promoting concrete solutions.
Level of harm: Real but low. 4/🧵
No group can ever own a phrase, but messaging matters
Read Bea's short thread, which I summarize as "specific slogans empower specific causes, retaining a slogan for a specific cause helps retain its rhetorical power":
Bea is right that reusing a slogan that popularized cause X (highlight police violence against Black people) to popularize cause Y (highlight bullying / interpersonal violence against trans people) slightly dilutes the future power of the slogan to popularize either cause 5/🧵
But that harm is finite and relatively small. It does *not* merit a left-spanning, bridge-burning, all-consuming Discourse. 6/🧵
Over the past 7 days, usage of "say her name" barely increased above background noise. It's a popular phrase which can't be diluted much:
Level of mitigation: Very low. 7/🧵
There is no coordinating body, no slogan workshop, no unifying figure or media that can guide The Left toward The Best Slogan. (Contrast Fox News or Donald Trump.)
Our slogans are undirected, mostly randomly generated from popular anger.
You can see that in the failure of the discourse to achieve its goal: Switch the hashtag. 8/🧵
Despite 50 million views (!!) on posts which I estimate were roughly 2/3 pro-switching
People have continued to post SayHerName (left) about 2x more than HerNameIsBrianna (right):
So much wailing and gnashing of teeth for... nothing. 9/🧵
What can we learn from this?
- It's mostly not feasible to stop a popular moment's slogan
- Trying to do so in public via negative appeals ("don't say X, say Y") causes immense infighting
- People love meaningless drama
What should we do instead? 10/🧵
- Boost the slogan you prefer
- Use DMs and positive appeals: "Glad you're promoting X, I think Y is an even stronger slogan")
- Focus on substance over rhetoric (if you engage with The Discourse, use that attention to refocus on substance)
So, with all that said: 11/🧵
Her name is Brianna. She was murdered. She deserved a world that accepted her.
We can build one. Hate will lose. Progress is coming.
A few other photo albums have survived, such as the Auschwitz Album. They provide only indirect evidence of war crimes.
For example, the Bauleitung Album shows Crematory 4 of Auschwitz without soot in 1943 and with heavy soot just months later: photos.yadvashem.org/index.html?lan…
it's wild how mad ☭ Twitter is at Keffals for saying "Stalin did ethnic cleansing"
the Soviets were notoriously legalistic -- they kept detailed records on the transport and settlement of the ~3.5m ethnic minority people they deported!
Twitter unbanned and verified Nick Fuentes, the most prominent neo-Nazi alive
Fuentes denies the Holocaust, promotes "scientific racism" against black and brown people, wants teen marriages, wants to end democracy, wants to make Trump dictator.
Here's the videos to prove it: 🧵
TLDR: "I don't believe in democracy. I do not believe in universal suffrage. I don't support women's rights. I don't support 'LGBT rights.' I believe in race and gender essentialism. [....] I'm a Catholic reactionary. I believe that organized Jewry is extremely influential." 🧵
In this video, Fuentes explains how he uses humor to hide his true beliefs on the Holocaust and other issues:
"Irony is so important for giving a lot of cover and plausible deniability for our views." 🧵
it's wild that there was a decade -- 1966-1976 -- when there were zero executions in the US
(the US had executed about 125 people per year for 60 years, 1890-1950)
about 1 in 2 of those executions were Black people
about 1 in 2 of those executions were in the South
reconstruction never should've ended
Koniaris et al 2005 examined death penalty victims postmortem. They found:
"[M]ost of the executed inmates had concentrations that would not be expected to produce a surgical plane of anaesthesia, and 21 (43%) had concentrations consistent with consciousness."