(1) IMPORTANT
We closely observe developments + revealing info that directly and/or indirectly impact our efforts as Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers and case ongoing in US Tax Court (Doyle, Moynihan v IRS). All details on our Pinned Tweet.
MAJOR PROPS to @realjusthuman >>
(2) who recently penned an incredible thread on his Substack which leads us to understand why The New York Times seems to be increasingly nervous about John Durham. Here is @realjusthuman thread: justhuman.substack.com/p/small-clues-…
(3) Serious 'students' will want to get an extra coffee and take your time to navigate that full thread. Those among us who appreciate Cliff Notes will appreciate that cases within that thread center on the following Criminal Violations: 18 US Code 641 - Public Money, Property or
(5) and 18 US Code 793 - Gathering, Transmitting or Losing Defense Information: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18….

SERIOUS!!
W/FULL CREDIT to @realjusthuman, he writes:
"The Accidental Discovery.
The case I had accidently found while searching for the “super secret SpyGate case” was
(6) 20-SC-3361 (ZMF) , the Six Email Accounts Disclosure Case (Filed January 5th, 2021).

The case I found that is connected to it, 1:21-MC-00091 (ZMF), is the NYT Case asking for further unsealing in the Six Email Accounts Case. They wanted the Justice Department to unseal the
(7) Application for the seizure of records and everything else.

The Times was successful in getting unsealed much, not all but much, of the docket for the case titled APPLICATION OF USA FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR SIX EMAIL ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY GOOGLE FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION OF
(8) 18 U.S.C. §§ 641 AND 793.

Those CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS referenced ARE VERY SERIOUS. As the thread highlights, they appear to be central to the entire Clinton related legal cases.

TY @realjusthuman for your tremendous work in drawing attention to those cases + violations.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers

Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CFWBers

Feb 17
The guy on the far left of photo below was exposed yesterday for DEPTH of his relationship w/Jeffrey Epstein.

Who else is in this photo?
When was it taken?
One of these individuals was president of a major university? Which one? When?

wsj.com/articles/email…
(2) How about guy on far right? Who has he been most closely connected w/over the course of his career?

What happened w/him in August 2019?

Think the guy second from right is little more than an acquaintance who had dinner w/the central figure in the photo? Follow the $$
(3) Back to the guy second from left, during his tenure as president of that major university, the school partnered w/a well known foundation for purposes of a now well known 'supposedly' medical philanthropic initiative. Any guesses as to name of that foundation?
Follow the $$
Read 9 tweets
Jul 3, 2022
(1/19) Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers
Doyle, Moynihan v IRS (United States Tax Court)

After a 3+ month hiatus from this platform, I welcome relaunching this account given that our case has been partially unsealed and can now be publicly tracked: dawson.ustaxcourt.gov/case-detail/48…
(2/19) What About Our Case?
The Docket Record is fully listed, the Judge's Orders are unsealed while filings made by us and the IRS are listed yet still under seal.
Key Dates: October 8, 2020: Judge rules IRS "abused its discretion" in handling our WB submission and denies
(3/19) the IRS request for Summary Judgment (dismissal). MAJOR!!
April 22, 2021: Judge orders case remanded to IRS "for investigation and development of the record to
determine whether IRS/CI (Criminal Investigation) proceeded with an investigation." Recall that our WB Submission
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(