Maybe you'll like this; maybe it will get up your nose.
A promising thread on a promising anti-viral nasal spray that uses nitric oxide [NO].
The activity of [NO] in the respiratory tract is astonishingly complicated, I have discovered.
But I like what I have found.
1/13
Respiratory tract cells make and use a lot of [NO] for a lot of purposes. As a reactive free-radical molecule (a bit like having velcro all over it), [NO] is only around for milliseconds before attaching to something.
2/13
For the science geeks in the crowd, I found this review particularly helpful.
TLDR: in LARGE doses [NO] is a bad idea because it can damage tissue. But in small doses it appears to be an effective antiviral for respiratory viruses.
There are caveats. If illness progresses to pneunomnia, [NO] may make that worse. It also worsens herpes and a few other NON-respiratory viruses.
These mechanisms seem to be a bit of a head-scratcher.
But the antiviral effect on coronavirus and influenza is clear.
4/13
I started looking into it when my absolutely awesome dentist gave me an Israeli [NO] nasal spray called Enovid to try.
(An early birth control pill from the 1970s had the same name, so the literature search was a bit confusing at first.)
5/13
There is evidence that after exposure, using this spray significantly reduces risk of developing illness. If mild illness has developed, using the spray significantly reduces time to recovery.
Basically, by killing virions at the start, the effective viral dose is reduced.
6/13
You can buy Enovid online from Israel right now. I just bought a bunch more. It's really f-ing expensive, however: about $60 CAD for one spray that expires in 30 days after opening.
Because [NO] is so reactive, in this case I take the expiry date seriously.
7/13
However, the same spray is being marketed in Canada as "SaNOtize" and elsewhere as "virX". (sanotize.com/clinical-trial…).
Clearly they need marketing help.
But more importantly, a Health Canada approval trial is under way now. I hope that leads to domestic manufacture.
8/13
A domestic product might be much cheaper. Regardless, governments, health plans, and employers should subsidize this to make it equitably available.
I should mention that it's currently only approved for ages 12+, I hope more studies will push that approval age lower.
9/13
I'll conclude by telling you why I'm excited about it. I currently don't share indoor air without a mask.
Not surprisingly I haven't contracted COVID.
But my kids do some maskless sports (eg hockey), after which a blast of [NO] would make us all safer.
10/13
Moreover, I miss some social activities, like indoor dining. Having studied this product, it may be that outside of respiratory virus season (winter), I'd be willing to go unmasked in uncrowded, well ventilated venues, using Enovid as prophylaxis.
11/13
This doesn't feel to me like a license to be reckless. But having studied and used it for a month, I'll tell you it honestly makes me feel safer.
One last thing, fwiw: I don't know the company or anyone who works for it, and I'd never take money to promote a drug.
12/13
One other last thing.
I'm in no way surprised to have heard of this through my dentist, and not an infectious disease physician.
On the whole, dentists take COVID and prevention far more seriously, IMO.
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@ASPphysician OK, let's do this one at a time, and then I think I can identify the underlying issue here: your epistemology is calibrated for clinical practice guidelines. A large n study, meta-analysis, and the like.
Mine is to make sense of emerging data, it's a different way of knowing...
@ASPphysician So, liver damage. The low n spate of kids with severe liver failure has been attributed by some to adenovirus.
But there is evidence going back to 2020 from India about liver damage from COVID.
d
More recently, a small n pediatric descriptive study: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35687535/
...
@ASPphysician Low n + rare, but this may be the tip of the iceberg. Kids are horrifically understudied in medical research. Some clinicians (et tu?) will then latch on to "there is no evidence that ..." to deny in kids what we know in adults, only because the measurement hasn't been done.
...
Some like to blame mask wearing last year for a grotesque spike in severe child illness this year.
That view is entirely wrong. But regardless, BC had no protections to blame. No masks or HEPA filters at school. Unsurprisingly, they had record levels of RSV last year.
A word on the idiocy known as "immunity debt". How did such a nonsensical idea take hold?
Simple. The obvious mental model for our immune system is a muscle: use it or lose it. Muscles atrophy when we don't use them. The same mental model works for our memories & skills.
1/19
So it shouldn't be surprising that a satisfying narrative emerges, using this same mental model, while simultaneously vilifying lock-downs and masks, which nobody liked anyway.
But here's the thing. The immune system isn't anything like a muscle. It's a photo collection.
2/19
Photo collections don't fade just because we don't look at them. They sit until they're needed.
Our immune system uses its "photo collection" to recognize pathogens we have encountered before.
And new mugshots get made whenever a new intruder is identified.
This Thanksgiving is different from the past two under COVID.
1. This year, the virus is way more prevalent, AND more way more immune escaping (from vax as well as past infection).
2. This year, our hospitals are overwhelmed for those unlucky enough to become very ill.
1/8
3. This year, no gov't or public health leadership safety advice. (Many WILL act IF they hear it.)
4. The media have also been deadly quiet about how to stay safe. Unhelpful.
Despite all these differences, staying safe simply requires the SAME vigilance as last year.
2/8
Here are 5 pieces of safety advice, none of it new:
1. Buy portable HEPA filters and situate them where people are. Cleaner indoor air is helpful for lung health and allergies over and above being effective at preventing transmission.
3/8
There's autoimmune Long COVID, and that does seem treatable and reversible from what I'm told.
Then there's vascular damage COVID where people can't work anymore. That's expensive when it's permanent.
Then there is Long COVID diabetes. Definitely permanent & expensive.
2/15
Then there is organ destruction Long COVID. We might be able to scale up our organ transplant infrastructure for that, but we'll need more donors without COVID-damaged organs.
But the one that's worst and most likely to be excluded and ignored is brain-damage COVID. Why?
I've been studying the BC COVID seroprevalence study, co-authored by Bonnie Henry, who until recently had insisted that schools were safe. And now we know that most children (more than adults) have been infected.
It's presented as good news: robust "hybrid immunity!!"
1/17
But it's better understood as a horror show, IMO.
First, parents didn't consent to this, they were actively misled. Second, immunity to COVID is temporary, but some Long COVID symptoms, like diabetes and death, aren't. Hybrid immunity is a lousy deal.
2/17
Third, reinforcing the belief that COVID isn't a big deal for kids resulted in lower vaccination rates, and risks for those kids is so much higher.
So many kids were hospitalized in BC (and elsewhere) while nothing was done to make schools safer.