#Leaked: an internal “FAQ” that Kshama Sawant is sharing with her @SeattleCouncil colleagues defending her unlawful caste proposal targeting South Asians is egregiously biased & hateful.
As Sawant admits, Seattle policy already bans discrimination based on national origin - ancestry too. What she doesn’t say is that her proposal violates the very policies that she seeks to amend by discriminating against a minority on the basis of their national origin & ancestry
Targeting just South Asians based on a biased Equality Labs survey that the credible Carnegie Endowment panned is not just wrong, it’s unethical.
Sawant falls back on this flawed “survey” as she lacks facts and evidence.
In fact, Sawant goes to the extent of saying we don’t even need studies! She would just label South Asians casteist and tell @SeattleCouncil to just believe her & her allies—ignoring what so many of those actually living and working in Seattle are saying.
Of course Sawant labels @HinduAmerican “right-wing.” From her radical vantage as a self-described “Marxist socialist” any reasonable voice is right wing. We won’t be intimidated by Sawant’s tactics & neither should @SeattleCouncil become a part of Sawant’s ideological project.
Exactly! Caste has no markers. This is why this proposal will infringe on due process. How will @SeaCityAttorney enforce a policy on caste when there is no way to determine a person’s caste? Will Seattle just assign a caste & determine which is oppressed or dominant? Ludicrous!
See how Sawant racializes caste? Targeting brown South Asians is not the same as fighting anti-black racism or what LGBT folks face.
There is no appearance or religious practice that distinguishes caste. Sawant is making up a category to fulfill a political agenda
Sawant’s FAQ’s make clear that while she leaves @SeattleCouncil in disgrace, her goal is to signal to her ideological fellow travelers her broader political goals. We hope the Seattle City Council rejects her attempts to be dragged into this legal morass.
Dear @SeattleCouncil,
Do not let your legacy be one that repeats the ugliness of the 18th and 19th century when Asians were similarly demonized and denied basic civil rights—right there in Washington state.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is such an important thread from an Indian origin scholar/activist in the US because it illustrates such profound confusion/myopia about caste, its racist conflations & colonial implementation.
These scholars are the ones pushing DEI folks into really bad "caste" policy.🧵
So @Sonjamthomas_ starts by claiming that caste is "systemic" & not an "administrative" construct. She insists that British colonialists just "named it" as it had been around for "CENTURIES" (all caps!). And oh btw, she's an "expert" & a "scholar" she reminds us, so be impressed.
And to ice it, our scholar ends by claiming that it wasn't the British, but Indians themselves who pushed "racialized conceptions" of themselves to justify caste status/privileges.
Citation? Well, she offers us her own study of presumably her own Syrian Christian community.
.@davidfrawleyved's poignant translation of Shukla Yajur Veda 36.12–15, 17–18 reminds me of why I'm so grateful to be an inheritor of this ancient, timeless wisdom 🕉️amongst so many other things.
"May the Goddess Waters be auspicious for us to drink...
1/5
May they flow, they flow with blessings upon us
May the Earth be pleasant and free of thorns as
our place of rest
May She grant us a wide peace
May the Divine Waters which grant us blessings
May they sustain our vigor and energy,
and for a great vision of delight...
2/5
May we partake of that which is their most auspicious essence, as from loving mothers.
May the Heaven grant us peace, and the Atmosphere
May the Earth grant us peace, and the Waters
May the plants and the great forest trees give us
their peace...
3/5
The gotcha tweets poking fun at Rishi Sunak's origin story being tied to Africa or Pakistan or the UK may be amusing, but are also meaningless.
They completely elide that what most Hindus appreciate in Sunak is a visibly Hindu man whose religiosity does not seem performative. 🧵
When Sunak sports a kalawa on his wrist, lights diya in front of the home, bows deeply to a sannyasin, performs a gau pooja, speaks of his Hindu identity, it feels natural, genuine. Sunak is comfortable in his own skin. This resonates with many 2nd/3rd gen Hindus in the diaspora
because Hinduism for subsequent generations of Hindus in the diaspora is rooted in India but India is incidental to our Hinduism. Our sacred geography is in India, but there are a plethora of meaningful sacred spaces created where we have lived.
I bet the Islamist & radical fringe groups that paid 6-figures for that @nytimes ad are kicking themselves.
If only they knew the NYT was going to horrifically gaslight Hindus the next day for free.
Getting the cause of riots wrong to using a discredited source-it’s all there.
A side by side comparison with the @BBCNews is telling, and one can’t help but wonder what drives the @nytimes reporting.
Why would @meganspecia platform Majid Freeman whose disinformation was reported as the proximate cause of the troubles? @BBCNews was clear on that. Compare👇🏼
And while I’m not surprised @nyt targets Hindus & their ostensible dastardly fealty to “Hindutva,” @meganspecia couldn’t produce a shred of evidence that Indian politics or any Hindutva “gang’ was behind violence. Nothing. Again, at least @BBCNews was honest about it. Compare:
Why did we sue @CalDFEH? Good coverage by @RNS, but to clarify 🧵:
The crux of HAF’s lawsuit is whether the state of California is violating Hindu Americans’ constitutional rights to religious freedom by defining Hindu religious teachings and practices and that too incorrectly;
whether California is violating Hindu Americans’ constitutional rights to equal protection by singling out people of Indian origin and Hindus and defining them as inherently bigoted and targeting us in a way that it doesn’t target any other ethnic or religious group; and whether
@CalDFEH violates Hindu Americans’ constitutional rights to due process by attempting to define caste, which has no universally agreed upon definition, through racist tropes and false presumptions that will only further perpetuate bias & prejudice against Hindus/Indian Americans.
Thank you! @nitashatiku@washingtonpost reporting that @Google said no to its renegade former manager seeking to platform Equality Labs—known for a long record of divisive, Hinduphobic advocacy. This time, a large tech company exercised due diligence & refused to be bullied.🧵
Report says @google employees were concerned Equality Labs’ programming would sow divisions amongst workers.
They’re right. EL’s work is rife with Hinduphobic, racist terms like “Brahmanism” & promotes a reading list actually calling for Hindus to convert to Buddhism or Islam.
The @washingtonpost even carries a letter that the EL founder wrote to @sundarpichai heckling him about his family’s “caste,” that caste is intrinsic to him and that Pichai bears responsibility to platform EL’s Hinduphobia because of violence in Madurai — in India! Stunning!