Great idea: time for Elacestrant thread Tuesday! 🧵
But first a reminder: access to paywalled papers from @Annals_Oncology, @ESMO_Open & multiple other affiliated journals is free for @myESMO members, and I could not recommend more to become a member! esmo.org/membership 1/
Endocrine treatment is among the most effective treatment strategies we have for breast cancer. 50 years ago, the approval of the SERD tamoxifen really revolutionized the field, & we still use the drug today.
Yet, no novel ET had been approved for the last 20 years. Until now 2/
Multiple oral SERDs (selective estrogen receptor degraders) are being developed for patients with HR+ MBC. The first to achieve positive phase 3 results was elacestrant, tested in the #EMERALD trial vs. SoC ET (fulvestrant or AI). Primary endpoint -> PFS overall & in ESR1-mut
3/
EMERALD enrolled 478 pts with HR+ MBC, mostly in 2nd/3rd line, all of which had received CDK4/6i, most with visceral disease and about half with ESR1-mutant disease.
Nearly all patients were AI-refractory, about 30% received prior fulvestrant and 20% prior chemotherapy
4/
Primary results were published on @JCO_ASCO: elacestrant significantly improved PFS vs SoC ET & was well tolerated.
However, the absolute PFS benefit was small, and many pts progressed at the first scan in both arms
Data at #SABCS22 showed that a major PFS improvement with elacestrant was seen among ESR1m tumors. The benefit further increased if there was a prolonged benefit from prior CDK4/6i
Based on these data, elacestrant was approved by the @FDAOncology on Jan 27 for ESR1m HR+ MBC
6/
Importantly, this is not the only novel drug approved in this space. In 2019, alpelisib was approved for treating patients w/ PIK3CA mutant HR+ MBC.
After progression to 1L, it is thus standard to look for PIK3CA muts to select patients for alpelisib
Reading good review articles can shape ideas, help connecting the dots and understanding what’s coming ahead in science.
Here’s 10 review articles that helped me shape my views on breast oncology and drug development:
1. The basics, first. What is breast cancer? How do we classify it, how do we treat it? In this article, Ada Waks et al. provide a comprehensive view of the clinical management of breast cancer, recapitulating decades of advancements in the field. jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
2. Now, a deeper dive into the subtypes. Despite being intensively studied, ER+ breast cancer remains elusive in many aspects. In this article, @DrHBurstein reviews the biology and paradigms behind the treatment of the most common subtype of breast cancer. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Proud to contribute to the remarkable scientific journey of #APT, whose 10-year analysis is now published on @TheLancetOncol. Adjuvant TH confirmed outstanding long-term outcomes for patients with small HER2+ breast cancer. Aim for the next decade: biomarker-informed treatments!
T-DXd has shown remarkable activity for treating HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancers.
However, it may soon expand its reach, and become a treatment option even for HER2-0 tumors.
Here’s the 10 reasons why:
1. Because it works!
The only study that tested T-DXd for treating HER2-0 metastatic breast cancer (the phase 2 DAISY trial) demonstrated a response rate of 30% and a duration of response of 6.8 months. Not bad for being “zero”.
2. Because activity of T-DXd in HER2-0 has been also observed in other tumor types.
In DESTINY-Lung01 (T-DXd for HER2-mutant NSCLC), several responses were observed in patients w/ HER2-0 tumors, including the only complete response observed in the trial.