I watched or read all of the interviews the Fulton County special grand jury forewoman did so you don’t have to. And after a night of sleep and hearing from experts, I don’t think this is worth freaking out about. 1/
Emily Kohrs struck me as an excitable young woman who, despite not voting in ‘16 or ‘20, was delighted to find herself at the center of something that matters to our democratic process. And as she reveled in that, she had many of us holding our collective breath. 2/
She was like an overconfident gymnast on a balance beam: One somersault or even an errant step away from a big tumble that could hurt the process. Fortunately, she stayed on. 3/
For all the talking she did, she didn’t say much. Yes, we now know Meadows testified and invoked privilege often. Yes, she confirmed they recommended indictments of more than a dozen people. Yes, she was flabbergasted & amused when told of Trump’s claim of “total exoneration.” 4/
And yes, I’d bet many of you would clean her out in poker, given her face’s propensity to say what her mouth would not. But did she reveal deliberations about specific charges or people? At worst, she explained why the special grand jury declined to call Trump for testimony. 5/
I’m not saying a future defendant won’t make a motion of some kind based on her media tour. But given that GA special grand juries are investigative, not charging, bodies & that GA law, unlike federal law, favors public disclosure of grand jury proceedings, it’ll likely fail. 6/
I’m also not telling you that DA Willis and Judge McBurney have no right to be annoyed. We don’t know exactly how the judge instructed the grand jurors & if she stayed on the right side of *his* line. And were I Willis, I’d be irritated by any grand juror talking publicly now. 7/
Still, Emily Kohrs’s pursuit of her fifteen minutes is not likely to preclude anyone indicted and convicted from serving their term of years. 8/
If anything, the interviews revealed she is no Democratic partisan hack. She walked in mostly ignorant about the 2020 storyline & was taken by the GOP stars she met. Shaking hands with Rudy was her “coolest” moment. Trump spoke in an “iconic” way. Graham was a personable hoot. 9/
I just hope whatever happens, wherever she is, her appreciation for the role we all can play means she’ll vote next year. FIN
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Especially in a post-Roe world, medication abortion is a vital form of abortion access. And as soon as tonight, a federal district court judge in Texas is poised to enjoin the FDA's decades-old approval of mifepristone, the critical ingredient in medication abortion. 1/
Specifically, the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine -- a group represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center -- is seeking to undo a series of FDA approvals for mifepristone, some dating back more than 20 years. 2/
Their arguments include that the FDA has exceeded its authority with respect to how/where mifepristone can be prescribed & that it did not sufficiently study its safety and efficacy, notwithstanding studies consistently showing the safety of medication abortion. 3/
Today, Trump and E. Jean Carroll filed motions to exclude certain evidence from her defamation trial against him. He says the Access Hollywood tape -- where he gives his infamous "when you're a star . . . you can do anything" speech -- is irrelevant. 1/
But where the central claim is whether he, in fact, raped Carroll, his explanation of that tape in this newly-released portion of the deposition suggests it is probably not just relevant, but a significant admission. 2/
While Trump has oft denied rape/sexual assault accusations with the "she's not my type" trope, he also threw it at Carroll lawyer Robbie Kaplan. I don't expect jurors will see this part, but her response -- "I'm an attorney in cases suing you" -- is priceless. 3/
Judge Luttig was the legal mind to whom Pence turned when he needed a respected, conservative stalwart to defend his intended course of action on 1/6. His tweets that day thrust him into a spotlight he had largely avoided in his post-judicial life. 1/
He later became a starring witness at one of the 1/6 hearings, explaining with why, despite a lifetime in Republican and conservative circles, he could not legally justify the path Trump begged Pence to take—and how Trump’s ongoing election denialism threatens us all. 2/
And that’s why Luttig’s tweet thread tonight is all the more notable. Luttig erected Pence’s defense, by Tweet, of his 1/6 conduct. But he’s not leaping to Pence’s side now, instead taking a more modest view of the protections the Speech & Debate Clause afford Pence. 3/
In the introduction of its report, the Fulton County Special Grand Jury makes clear its unanimous finding -- after hearing from 75 witnesses, including who still maintain there was fraud in the 2020 election -- that there was no such widespread fraud. 1/
"We find by a unanimous vote that no widespread fraud took place in the Georgia 2020 presidential election that could result in overturning that election." 2/
And as expected after reviewing the Vernon Jones report, the portions we got tell us more about the kinds of evidence received. But with one exception, we know zip about the special grand jury's recommended charges and against whom. 3/
THREAD: Tomorrow, 3 portions of the final report of the Fulton County special grand jury will be released: the introduction, conclusion, and discussion of the concern that certain unnamed witnesses may have lied under oath. But what does a special grand jury report look like? 1/
In directing the release those specific portions of the report, Judge Robert McBurney's order tells us where to look: The special grand jury report about then-DeKalb County Chief Executive Vernon Jones was made public in 2013.
And that report -- which appears to have been drafted by the Special Grand Jury itself -- contains an introduction, conclusion, and even a section on witnesses who lied under oath. 4/
What is really notable here is NYT's reporting that Beryl Howell, the chief judge of the federal trial courts in D.C., will leave that position next month. So what, you say? Not quite. 2/
Each federal district court has its own local rules. In D.C., those rules provide that the chief judge's duties include the determination of "all matters relating to proceedings before the grand jury." 3/