Congrats to Forest on their new sponsor, 6686.com, a gambling firm without even a working website and which is licenced, as they always are, through Isle of Man white label shop, TGP. #NFFC
While the holding site claims it will serve UK punters, the name 6686, which is composed of numbers traditional regarded as lucky in China.
Strangely, thus far, Forest don't seem to have announced the deal. And there doesn't seem to be much available online to shed any light on this new partner.
However, there is also a website 6686.com.com, which appears to offer a heady mix of casino games, sports betting and semi-naked ladies. I don't know, at this stage, if they are related to 6686.com.
Still, who'd notice one more opaque, Asian-facing, loop-hole enabled, anonymous gambling company clinging like a parasitical worm to football's fat underbelly?
Intriguingly, while UK punters are directed to a website saying "coming soon", accessing 6686.com from some other countries redirects you 96686.app, suggesting perhaps that 6686 are in fact already operating in other countries.
One can only wonder why a legit gambling firm would claim to be launching soon, use TGP for anonymity, sign a partnership with a sport shown in territories where gambling is illegal, use a brand name with lucky Chinese numbers and then secretly redirect customers to its app.
A couple of little extras on Forest's new gambling partner 6686.com, which signed a deal with a UK club but has no functioning UK website. The company also signed a deal late last year with Lazio and has done some promotional films.
6686.com doesn't appear on Lazio's Italian or English language websites as a commercial partner. But it is on what appears to be the club's Chinese website, where it claims to be a Philippine-licensed betting company founded in 2011.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With previous illegal betting firms having been caught out using made up staff, Wolves' partner used a freelance British PR consultant to give a quote. NET88, by contrast, seem not to have any named employees.
As Josimar have documented time after time, these are not legitimate companies. Their services are by definition illegal. They are often connected to organised crime and horrendous human rights abuses.
We're all a bit inured to stories about 777, but this one isn't a concern about cashflow difficulties or historical drug trafficking or risky investment strategies or dubious business practices. These are allegations of one of the most basic and oldest forms of fraud.
Story from Bloomberg here. Even if you can't access it, the extract above tells you the key claims. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
You can find the paperwork for the lawsuit here. As @theesk says, it is extraordinary. theesk.org/everton-777-pa…
The announcement describes him as being of "Winners Worldwide," implying that this is the most significant part of empire as a "businessman, angel investor and philanthropist." Winners Worldwide is an 11-month-old limited company with £1 of share capital. 2/
From what I can tell looking at Companies House, Mr Liaquat has founded 8 companies, including Winners Worldwide. Four of those have been dissolved. Of the four active companies, two are facing strike off for non-filing of accounts or confirmation statements. And...
3/
Giving evidence before the DCMS committee, Rick Parry says that Premier League's cost control proposals would limit Championship clubs to spending £20m a year while relegated PL clubs could spend £110m! - more than five times other clubs and worse than the current set up.
This would be replacing the parachute payments system with a jetpack system.
As Parry points out, "in each of the last six years, two of the three promoted clubs [from the Championship to the PL] have been [in receipt of parachute payments.] That's not fair."
Bombshell events in Morecambe as the board of directors release a statement attacking the owner’s failure to sell the club, calling on potential buyers to contact them directly and implying that, unless things change, they will resign en-masse. Never seen anything like it. 1/
Unlike most football club boards, the Morecambe directors, while appointed by the owner, are not his placemen. They are largely long-standing fans of the club trying to steer Morecambe through financial turmoil.
2/
It seems that the board has been trying to keep its problems with the owner in-house for some time but that their patience has run out. Not clear what happens next, but realistically either the owner needs to change his attitude and get serious about facilitating a sale or…
3/
I saw a piece about the new £100m London mansion of Reading owner's Dai Yongge. Doing some digging, there may be a more interesting story here: not only does he not own it, he rents it from a business rival, who is now suing him and whose UK representative is... Reading’s CEO. 1/
Curious – well, nosey – I had a poke around. A reverse image search shows it’s 6 Buckingham Gate. It’s pretty swish and, as the article implies, quite a contrast with the straightened circumstances of Reading. However, all may not be what it seems… 2/
I had understood that, rather than being a recent purchase, this was a place Dai had actually owned for several years. But, looking at the Land Registry, it’s not owned by Dai directly and doesn’t appear to have changed hands in twelve years. 3/