🧵regarding the terminology of some common suture needle types.
This is a revised version of a 🧵I did several months ago (I’ve been on vacation 😎, and it’ll be a bit untiI I have new material).
This is the ubiquitous SH needle we all know. But what does SH stand for? (1/ )
Note: This thread pertains only to Ethicon needles, which is what we have at my hospital. Other companies have other systems.
Shown here is the chart from the Ethicon manual. Each of the letter combinations has a specific meaning, and most of these make at least some sense.
Going back to the SH needle again…It’s a taper point needle in the form of a half circle. The SH is the shortest of these at 26 mm, so it’s called ‘Short Half’ (circle).
Its increasingly larger alternatives include the MH, LH, XLH, and XXLH.
CT stands for ‘Circle Taper’.
Again, as the name implies, these are also tapered needles. There is the CT (40 mm) and then the CT-1 is a little smaller at 36 mm. There is also a CT-2 (not shown - it is 26 mm).
PS stands for ‘plastic surgery’.
This is a PS-1. It continues with PS-2 and PS-3, which are smaller. These are 3/8 circle and are *reverse cutting* needles, appropriate for skin closure.
PS-4, -5, and -6 exist, and these are slightly different at 1/2 circle (click to enlarge).
Prolene sutures often come on a BV needle which stands for...wait for it...
'Blood vessel' 🤔
BV-1 is very common, but there are a few variants. All of the BV needles are 3/8 circle and have a tapered point, and the variation is in the length.
The famous UR-6 needle. It is **5/8 circle**. The 'UR' stands for ‘urology’.
Its unusual 5/8 circle curvature makes it useful for operating down in the confined space of the pelvis. General surgeons also use it to close trocar site fascia.
UR-5 and UR-4 exist, and are larger.
This is the monstrous ‘BP’ or ‘blunt point’ needle.
Unlike a tapered needle, the BP needle does not have a sharp point...the point is blunt on purpose.
#1 Chromic on a BP is used to suture liver lacerations, and the blunt tip helps avoid cutting of the liver parenchyma.
4-0 Monocryl is a good example of where needle types matter.
The reverse cutting PS-1 on the left is appropriate for subcuticular skin closure, but if the Monocryl is being used to sew on the bowel, it would not do well at all, and a (tapered) SH needle would be much better.
This symbol stands for ‘controlled release’. In the US, these are more commonly called ‘popoffs’.
'Popoffs' usually come in packs of several needles and are designed to easily pop off when the suture is pulled, so that one can skip the extra step of cutting the needle off.
This is a Keith needle (‘KS’ in Ethicon terminology).
The Keith is a long, straight reverse cutting needle, often used to grab big bites of tissue for sewing in drains (or central lines)
Its main advantage is that you don't need a needle holder to use it.
This chart is obviously rather busy, but it shows the Ethicon needle types all in one place.
Charts that compare needle types among different companies also exist, and may be found in a more readable form on the Internet.
Finally, both curved and straight needles are also packaged by themselves.
These are 'Richard-Allan' needles, and as you can see, these have to be loaded with suture material in the same way that non-medical sewing needles are.
⬛️
Addendum:
This is beyond the scope of the 🧵but since I mentioned 'reverse cutting' needles:
These have a cutting surface on the convex side of the needle, and actually are much more common than 'conventional' cutting needles (that have a cutting surface on the concave side).
Addendum #2:
I don't know what the 'Twisty Q' needle is used for.
It only comes on 0 Ethibond, and the needle itself is also black in color. It's obviously a specialty item.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I found commentary from a 1967 edition of Look magazine that sounds...familiar.
First: junior doctor dissatisfaction and low pay, and UK physicians leaving for elsewhere: (1/ )
It has always been the case that though much of the conversation has to do with pay, that the true causes of discontent are more complex than that. Again, this was noted more than 50 years ago:
It was noted at the time (once again: 1967) that the practice of having doctors in training move around every few months was a problem. Which I'm gathering, remains an issue.
Temporary shunts for vascular trauma have actually been around for >100 yr. The first widespread use likely began with Prof. Tuffier in France, who used them in wounded soldiers in WW1 (1914-18).
The strategy was different though... (1/ )
Formal vascular repair had been described by Carrel, but was impractical in war conditions due to practically all wounds having massive contamination and delayed presentation, which made the vessels more friable and difficult to suture.
Bernheim had a famous quote on this:
Transport times were much longer then, and most of the wounded who were going to die by exsanguination had already done that.
So instead, the main problem of vascular injury at the time was probably thrombosis of the injured vessel with ischemia of the distal tissues.
🧵regarding the technique of 2-handed knot tying.
It's July again, so it's a good time to revisit this 🧵.
2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is worth learning. We'll start with just the basic steps. Advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally *don't* want to start off with uncrossed threads (L picture).
Instead, it's better to cross the two threads first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the threads, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of threads, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L strand can be on top, or the R stand can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.
an underappreciated surgical knot that is used to secure a running suture. It has been shown to be more secure than a square knot.
We will cover how to do it, what not to do, and a modification that may make it more secure. (1/ )
An Aberdeen knot can be used at the end of a continuous (running) suture as an alternative to a square knot.
With a typical square knot, you will either be tying one strand to the two other strands in the loop, either by hand (L photo) or with an instrument tie (R photo).
But the Aberdeen knot is different. Instead of tying to the 2 strands, instead you'll use the single strand to go through the loop that is made by the other 2 strands.
Here, I'm holding the loop open with my R hand and using one of my R fingers to grab the string.