Will Scientific American retract this "fact check"?
Speaking of more things that aged poorly, here's the Seattle Times publishing Chinese state propaganda.
Don't worry folks, FactCheck dot org is on the case and they said there's no way it came from a lab.
Forbes strongly declared: the Wuhan lab leak theory (which they refer to as a hypothesis) a "conspiracy theory," not science. Will they retract?
Did USA Today have a crystal ball to determine that COVD-19 was neither "manmade or engineered"?
Full Fact seems a little half-baked in its claim that there was "no evidence that the 2019 coronavirus originated in a Chinese government laboratory."
The New York Times called it a "fringe theory." To their credit, they did a bunch of follow-up articles later on questioning the validity of the claim that it's just nonsense.
Democracy does indeed "die in darkness," Washington Post.
The list goes on. I could keep going and delve into how social media platforms actively censored any conversations on the COVID-19 lab leak theory but that's a thread for another day and has already been covered to some extent by the #TwitterFiles.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Humans are emotional creatures and need to be engaged on that level.
The reason leftists always win votes is because they play to those emotions. Poor helpless migrants, little trans children who are sad because no one will let them play with the girls in girls’ sports—you get the gist.
When you talk to voters about immigration and inflation—two very abstract, almost invisible concepts—it fails to engage most people. It fails to register.
Such people are willing to accept a slow trickle of a few thousand illegal aliens a week across a very large country in places where they don’t live. They’re willing to pay a few extra dollars a week for groceries and rent, especially if the increase is slow despite being compounding.
They’re willing to die a death by a thousand cuts as long as their emotions are satiated.
The only way to reach these people—most people—is to engage them on an emotional level.
What leftists don’t tell you is why they’re importing millions of voters, why they’re sterilizing thousands of children, why they’re letting cities turn to ruin, why they’re dismantling civilization.
It’s all a trickle. It happens at a slow pace. It’s the Long March Through the Institutions. Leftists are patient. They can afford to be. So you don’t see it until it’s too late, and in hindsight you wish you did.
The emotional approach works especially well on women. Enough that it makes them go out and vote against their own long-term interests. Not as much on men.
And the problem with men is that we’re being blackpilled in real time, enough that most men just don’t vote because they don’t think they’ll make a difference.
The entire evil leftist machine is geared towards incentivizing women to vote to satiate their short term emotional requirements and dishearten men from voting at all by making men feel disenfranchised, powerless.
That’s why Kamala Harris’ campaign engaged with emotional low-T men through her pleas for soy boys and “allies” to vote in the interests of women. The men her campaign has captured are not voting for their own interests. All her ads directed towards men have this exact messaging.
Her people aren’t stupid. She might be, but the people pulling the strings are not. They are evil and they know exactly what they’re doing.
Blazing Hot Takes from Joe Rogan's Marathon Chat with Donald Trump
If you missed out on the epic three-hour showdown between Joe Rogan and Donald Trump, here's the no-nonsense, straight-fire recap of the top 23 highlights:
Rogan and Trump rip into the media, accusing them of distorting facts and misleading the public with their narratives. The media is the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.
Barron Trump is not just hanging around. He's actively working to bring the youth on board with his dad's campaign.
Gavin Newsom's facade of cleanliness in San Francisco was just for show during Xi's visit, proving his lack of commitment to permanent change.
This post was a mistake. David Leavitt, a notorious "journalist" (not really, but that's another story) and liberal troll challenged his audience to post their selfies to prove once and for all that liberal women are hotter than conservatives. I make no judgment.
For all the pearlclutching that liberals and “enlightened” centrists are doing over the right’s attempts to hold leftists accountable for calling for the literal m*rder of President Trump—denouncing it as “cancel culture,” we seem to have forgotten what cancel culture actually is and how it was weaponized against anyone who didn’t toe the progressive line.
Let’s begin with Palmer Luckey, the founder of Oculus, who was fired from Meta for donating to Trump.
The media slandered him as a member of the “far-right” and Zuckerberg wrote a fake apology letter in his name.
Canadian PM Justin Trudeau arrested and froze the bank accounts of many who exercised their right to free speech in opposition to his vaccine mandates. Liberals were notably silent about this while simultaneously accusing Putin of censoring his critics.
John Gibson, CEO of Tripwire, a video game company, was fired from his job for making pro-life comments supporting a law in Texas.
When you key in 50 + 50 and hit the equals key, it’ll give you 100. Multiply that by 2 and you get 200. That’s correct.
But type in 50 + 50 * 2 and it spits out 150. What gives?
The order of operations is American and therefore wrong. PEMDAS is retarded.
In before a community notes abuser tells me it’s the order of operations as if people in the replies aren’t already doing that. It’s my OPINION that the order of operations ought to be simplified like it is in Casio calculators.