Matus is trying to understand how the Franciscans understood that alchemy 'worked' when the promised effects were conspicuous in their absence. He suggests they privileged the subjunctive over the 'real'.
In other words, given what they knew about God, how did they suppose nature is supposed to work. That seems to me the basis for much natural philosophy - looking (intentionally or otherwise) at how the world needs to be to support more foundational ethical or religious beliefs.
In short, natural philosophy was getting 'is' from 'ought'.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People often talk about how little literature survives from the ancient world, and if they are talking about Latin, they are right. (1/6)
The late professor John Vincent thought 10 million words of ancient Latin survive, but two million are legal texts and only a million are pre-Christian. A million words is roughly twice the size of The Lord of the Rings. (2/6)
The actual canon of classical Latin literature is even smaller. A set of the critical editions fits easily into a couple of bookshelves, and a third of it is by a single author - Cicero. (3/6)